Frontiers in medicine · 2025
Vitamin D and chronic kidney disease: mechanisms, clinical implications, and future perspectives.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Hong, Yuan Tingting, Wu Weihua, Ou Santao
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Vitamin D deficiency is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Vitamin D/vitamin D receptor (VDR) signaling intersects inflammation, oxidative stress/mitochondrial injury, fibrogenic pathways, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), and the gut-kidney axis, providing a biologic rationale for renoprotection.
METHODS: Narrative review; literature identified from PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library (January 2000-August 2025). Adult CKD populations (non-dialysis, dialysis, transplant) were included. Outcomes covered biologic/surrogate (e.g., proteinuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] slope) and hard endpoints (kidney failure, major cardiovascular events, fractures, mortality).
RESULTS: Nutritional vitamin D reliably corrects deficiency and improves laboratory profiles; VDR activators (VDRAs) suppress secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). However, consistent benefits on hard outcomes have not been demonstrated across CKD settings, likely reflecting heterogeneity (baseline vitamin D status, stage, co-therapies, endpoints) and formulation/dosing differences (D₃ vs. D₂; cholecalciferol vs. calcifediol; steady vs. bolus). Safety considerations (hypercalcemia/mineral imbalance) apply to active agents and high-dose bolus regimens.
CONCLUSION: A pragmatic approach is warranted: replete deficiency with nutritional vitamin D (prefer D₃; consider calcifediol when faster repletion or persistent SHPT is relevant), avoid mega-bolus dosing, and reserve active VDRAs for clear SHPT indications with careful calcium-phosphate-parathyroid hormone (PTH) monitoring-rather than positioning vitamin D as disease-modifying therapy for unselected CKD. Future trials should enrich truly deficient, higher-risk phenotypes, standardize regimens, and prioritize event-driven hard endpoints with embedded mechanistic markers to confirm on-target biology.
METHODS: Narrative review; literature identified from PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library (January 2000-August 2025). Adult CKD populations (non-dialysis, dialysis, transplant) were included. Outcomes covered biologic/surrogate (e.g., proteinuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] slope) and hard endpoints (kidney failure, major cardiovascular events, fractures, mortality).
RESULTS: Nutritional vitamin D reliably corrects deficiency and improves laboratory profiles; VDR activators (VDRAs) suppress secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). However, consistent benefits on hard outcomes have not been demonstrated across CKD settings, likely reflecting heterogeneity (baseline vitamin D status, stage, co-therapies, endpoints) and formulation/dosing differences (D₃ vs. D₂; cholecalciferol vs. calcifediol; steady vs. bolus). Safety considerations (hypercalcemia/mineral imbalance) apply to active agents and high-dose bolus regimens.
CONCLUSION: A pragmatic approach is warranted: replete deficiency with nutritional vitamin D (prefer D₃; consider calcifediol when faster repletion or persistent SHPT is relevant), avoid mega-bolus dosing, and reserve active VDRAs for clear SHPT indications with careful calcium-phosphate-parathyroid hormone (PTH) monitoring-rather than positioning vitamin D as disease-modifying therapy for unselected CKD. Future trials should enrich truly deficient, higher-risk phenotypes, standardize regimens, and prioritize event-driven hard endpoints with embedded mechanistic markers to confirm on-target biology.