International ophthalmology · 2026
Transepithelial corneal cross-linking: a review.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhou Wen, Subasinghe Sandeepani K, de Ribot Francesc March, Ogbuehi Kelechi C, Dias George J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This review aims to summarize the current understanding of transepithelial corneal cross-linking (TE-CXL) for treating keratoconus (KC). It focuses on how TE-CXL compares with the standard epithelium-off cross-linking (S-CXL) and discusses recent improvements intended to make it more effective.
METHODS: Relevant studies were reviewed from PubMed and Google Scholar. The review focused on research about new riboflavin solutions, delivery techniques, ultraviolet-A (UV-A) light settings, oxygen supply methods, and recent new technologies designed to improve the results of TE-CXL.
RESULTS: TE-CXL preserves the corneal epithelium, providing better patient comfort and fewer postoperative complications. However, its corneal stiffening effect is generally lower than S-CXL due to limited riboflavin penetration and UV photoactivation. Recent approaches, including chemical enhancers, iontophoresis-assisted delivery, optimized UV-A protocols, nanotechnology-based or ultrasound-assisted methods have demonstrated potential to improve biomechanical strengthening. In addition, theranostic-guided TE-CXL, which provides real-time monitoring of stromal riboflavin concentration and adaptive UV-A dosing, represents a promising advancement. Nevertheless, differences in treatment protocols and in oxygen and luminance parameters still lead to variability in clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: TE-CXL is a promising and less invasive treatment for KC, offering better comfort and faster recovery. However, its long-term stability and biomechanical effect remain inferior to S-CXL. Future progress will depend on optimizing riboflavin and oxygen delivery, refining UV-A irradiation protocols, and validating newer technologies such as theranostic-guided CXL through large-scale clinical studies.
METHODS: Relevant studies were reviewed from PubMed and Google Scholar. The review focused on research about new riboflavin solutions, delivery techniques, ultraviolet-A (UV-A) light settings, oxygen supply methods, and recent new technologies designed to improve the results of TE-CXL.
RESULTS: TE-CXL preserves the corneal epithelium, providing better patient comfort and fewer postoperative complications. However, its corneal stiffening effect is generally lower than S-CXL due to limited riboflavin penetration and UV photoactivation. Recent approaches, including chemical enhancers, iontophoresis-assisted delivery, optimized UV-A protocols, nanotechnology-based or ultrasound-assisted methods have demonstrated potential to improve biomechanical strengthening. In addition, theranostic-guided TE-CXL, which provides real-time monitoring of stromal riboflavin concentration and adaptive UV-A dosing, represents a promising advancement. Nevertheless, differences in treatment protocols and in oxygen and luminance parameters still lead to variability in clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: TE-CXL is a promising and less invasive treatment for KC, offering better comfort and faster recovery. However, its long-term stability and biomechanical effect remain inferior to S-CXL. Future progress will depend on optimizing riboflavin and oxygen delivery, refining UV-A irradiation protocols, and validating newer technologies such as theranostic-guided CXL through large-scale clinical studies.