Journal of market access & health policy · 2026
Role of General Practitioners in European Health Technology Assessment, EU-HTA Innovation in Oncology as an Example.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Widmer Daniel, Marcos Carrera Hermenegildo, Ruof Jörg, Fernando Gunasekara Vidanamestrige Chamath, Ouvrard Patrick, Bonnamour Marie-Christine, McCarthy Mary, Atreya Shrikant
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Different from established clinical guideline workstreams, the participation of general practitioners (GPs) in the health technology assessment (HTA) process at the European level is new. There is a research gap in this domain. The European Union of General Practitioners (UEMO) is the political association of GPs in Europe and has been collaborating as a stakeholder in the creation of the European Regulation on HTA since 2017. The aim of our research is to provide a framework for GPs'role in EU HTA.
METHODS: Mixed methods: questionnaire and focus groups.
PARTICIPANTS: Representatives of national medical/GP associations of 17 Member States of the EU and five EU non-member countries.
RESULTS: Most respondents supported GP involvement in the development of clinical recommendations relevant to general practice. Respondents emphasized that UEMO must turn to WONCA-Europe, the academic society of GPs, when scientific input is required. Among the ten priority topics for HTA in oncology, four emerged as most relevant for the GPs: 1. Conscientious prescription of interventions considering over- and under-medicalization, 2. establishing a system for continuity of care integrating palliative care, 3. ensuring evidence-based medicine, and 4. promoting collaborative care and considering workload.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The GP can contribute to the debate by defending these four priorities. Presenting the difficulties in this debate can contribute to a better understanding of the implementation of new technology in the real world.
METHODS: Mixed methods: questionnaire and focus groups.
PARTICIPANTS: Representatives of national medical/GP associations of 17 Member States of the EU and five EU non-member countries.
RESULTS: Most respondents supported GP involvement in the development of clinical recommendations relevant to general practice. Respondents emphasized that UEMO must turn to WONCA-Europe, the academic society of GPs, when scientific input is required. Among the ten priority topics for HTA in oncology, four emerged as most relevant for the GPs: 1. Conscientious prescription of interventions considering over- and under-medicalization, 2. establishing a system for continuity of care integrating palliative care, 3. ensuring evidence-based medicine, and 4. promoting collaborative care and considering workload.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The GP can contribute to the debate by defending these four priorities. Presenting the difficulties in this debate can contribute to a better understanding of the implementation of new technology in the real world.