MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0333102418801580

Медицинская библиотека · Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2018

Facial solitary morphea profunda presenting with painful trigeminal neuropathy: A case report.

Moreno-Ajona David, Moreno-Artero Ester, García de Eulate María Reyes, Irimia Pablo, España Agustín

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Localized facial scleroderma usually presents as frontal linear morphea or progressive hemifacial atrophy. Only isolated cases of trigeminal painful neuropathy have been described.

CASE REPORT: A 43-year-old woman developed an oval lesion on the right cheek. After 1 year, she noticed constant "pulling" pain and episodes of lancinating pain, both spontaneous and triggered by chewing and cold drinks. She was diagnosed with solitary morphea profunda and CT scan, ultrasonography, cranial MRI and biopsy were completed. Methylprednisolone (1 gr/day for 3 days) was prescribed. For pain, gabapentin, oxcarbazepine, amitryptiline, pregabalin and eslicarbacepine were all ineffective. A capsaicin patch was placed with prolonged benefit. Later on, the pain slightly worsened; occipital blockade was effective and methotrexate was recommended.

CONCLUSION

This is the first case of solitary morphea profunda associated with painful trigeminal neuropathy. Treatment should include immunosuppressants and treatment of neuropathic pain, in which local therapies seem particularly beneficial.

Для цитирования: Moreno-Ajona David, Moreno-Artero Ester, García de Eulate María Reyes, Irimia Pablo, España Agustín. Facial solitary morphea profunda presenting with painful trigeminal neuropathy: A case report.. Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0333102418801580.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.