Journal of bronchology & interventional pulmonology · 2026
Distinguishing Tracheobronchomalacia and Excessive Dynamic Airway Collapse on Dynamic CT Images.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Angelis Paolo, Cho Jae, Rama Martina, Mathew Fleming, Parikh Mihir S, Majid Adnan, Kent Michael S, Wilson Jennifer L, Gangadharan Sidhu P
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Expiratory central airway collapse (ECAC) is caused by anterior displacement of the posterior membrane (EDAC) or weakening of the cartilaginous walls (TBM). Differentiating the 2 is challenging, resulting in misdiagnosis and missed opportunities for patients. We investigated how accurately providers identify each pathology on computed tomographic (CT) images.
METHODS: Images from 100 patients who underwent tracheobronchoplasty (TBP) were reviewed by 4 airway experts and categorized into TBM, EDAC, normal airway, or unknown by majority consensus. Selected images of patients with TBM (n=9) and EDAC (n=9) were distributed to respondents. Linear regression was used to investigate overall accuracy; inter-rater agreement was measured using Fleiss' kappa (κ).
RESULTS: We recruited 35 surgeons and 35 pulmonologists. Most practiced at an academic center (68.5%) and cared for patients with ECAC (61.4%). Among surgeons, 14 (40.0%) performed ≥5 complex airway cases yearly, and 13 (37.1%) performed TBP. Only 1 (1.5%) assigned the correct diagnosis to all 18 patients, while 13 (18.6%) identified <50.0% of the correct diagnoses. Inter-rater agreement for respondents was low (κ=0.21; 95% CI: 0.17-0.30; P<0.01). Predictors of accuracy included ≥10 years in practice (β=0.49; 95% CI: 0.03-0.95; P=0.03) and practicing pulmonology (β=0.72; 95% CI: 0.15-1.29; P=0.02).
CONCLUSION: Distinguishing EDAC and TBM is challenging, with poor agreement among clinicians. Therefore, clinicians should consider referring any patient with ECAC early for multidisciplinary evaluation.
METHODS: Images from 100 patients who underwent tracheobronchoplasty (TBP) were reviewed by 4 airway experts and categorized into TBM, EDAC, normal airway, or unknown by majority consensus. Selected images of patients with TBM (n=9) and EDAC (n=9) were distributed to respondents. Linear regression was used to investigate overall accuracy; inter-rater agreement was measured using Fleiss' kappa (κ).
RESULTS: We recruited 35 surgeons and 35 pulmonologists. Most practiced at an academic center (68.5%) and cared for patients with ECAC (61.4%). Among surgeons, 14 (40.0%) performed ≥5 complex airway cases yearly, and 13 (37.1%) performed TBP. Only 1 (1.5%) assigned the correct diagnosis to all 18 patients, while 13 (18.6%) identified <50.0% of the correct diagnoses. Inter-rater agreement for respondents was low (κ=0.21; 95% CI: 0.17-0.30; P<0.01). Predictors of accuracy included ≥10 years in practice (β=0.49; 95% CI: 0.03-0.95; P=0.03) and practicing pulmonology (β=0.72; 95% CI: 0.15-1.29; P=0.02).
CONCLUSION: Distinguishing EDAC and TBM is challenging, with poor agreement among clinicians. Therefore, clinicians should consider referring any patient with ECAC early for multidisciplinary evaluation.