Irish medical journal · 2026
Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Patient Experience under Conscious Sedation versus Anaesthesia.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Maher L, McCarthy R, Helmi L, Byrne L, Kelly B, Walsh K
Аннотация
AIM: Radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation is an established treatment for atrial fibrillation. Patients are administered either conscious sedation or general anaesthesia. The purpose of this study was to compare patient experiences of conscious sedation versus general anaesthesia during pulmonary vein isolation.
METHODS: A retrospective, observational, single-centre, single-operator study was performed, comparing patient experiences of pulmonary vein isolation performed under general anaesthesia versus conscious sedation. A Likert scale questionnaire was used to compare satisfaction with the different modes of anaesthesia, with score of 1 denoted for very dissatisfied and score of 5 for very satisfied.
RESULTS: 41 patients were included - 20 (48.8%) in conscious sedation group, and 21 (51.2%) in general anaesthesia group. Groups were well-matched as regards age (mean 56.3 +/-13.7yrs), gender (71.4% male), percentage with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (76.2%), and percentage re-do cases (28.6%). Patients in the general anaesthesia group experienced lower levels of pain/discomfort (mean score 2.90 +/- 1.77 vs 1.33+/-0.80) (p<0.001) and were more likely to recommend the mode of anaesthesia (mean score 4.90 +/- 0.44 vs. 3.40 +/- 1.70) (p<0.001), compared with those in conscious sedation group. There was no significant difference in anxiety/depression post-procedure (p= 0.057), satisfaction with recovery time post-procedure (p=0.175), likelihood to recommend the procedure (p= 0.103), and overall satisfaction with the ablation experience (p=0.089).
DISCUSSION: Patients who had general anaesthesia for radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation experienced less peri-procedural pain than patients who had conscious sedation and were more likely to recommend general anaesthesia as a mode of anaesthesia.
METHODS: A retrospective, observational, single-centre, single-operator study was performed, comparing patient experiences of pulmonary vein isolation performed under general anaesthesia versus conscious sedation. A Likert scale questionnaire was used to compare satisfaction with the different modes of anaesthesia, with score of 1 denoted for very dissatisfied and score of 5 for very satisfied.
RESULTS: 41 patients were included - 20 (48.8%) in conscious sedation group, and 21 (51.2%) in general anaesthesia group. Groups were well-matched as regards age (mean 56.3 +/-13.7yrs), gender (71.4% male), percentage with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (76.2%), and percentage re-do cases (28.6%). Patients in the general anaesthesia group experienced lower levels of pain/discomfort (mean score 2.90 +/- 1.77 vs 1.33+/-0.80) (p<0.001) and were more likely to recommend the mode of anaesthesia (mean score 4.90 +/- 0.44 vs. 3.40 +/- 1.70) (p<0.001), compared with those in conscious sedation group. There was no significant difference in anxiety/depression post-procedure (p= 0.057), satisfaction with recovery time post-procedure (p=0.175), likelihood to recommend the procedure (p= 0.103), and overall satisfaction with the ablation experience (p=0.089).
DISCUSSION: Patients who had general anaesthesia for radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation experienced less peri-procedural pain than patients who had conscious sedation and were more likely to recommend general anaesthesia as a mode of anaesthesia.