MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/13668250.2026.2614681

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of intellectual & developmental disability · 2026

How special educators provide reading and writing instruction to secondary students with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A national survey of the United States of America.

Rodgers Derek B, Loveall Susan J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

There is limited research regarding teachers' instructional practices and beliefs around teaching reading and writing skills to secondary students with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

METHOD: Three hundred forty-eight special educators in the United States responded to a survey about their instructional practices, self-efficacy, and beliefs regarding reading and writing instruction.

RESULTS

Participants reported providing regular reading and/or writing instruction, enjoying and feeling confident in teaching these skills, and believing that reading and writing are important skills for their students. Participants' self-efficacy and years of experience explained significant variability in their beliefs about whether their students could improve their literacy skills.

CONCLUSION

Special educators overwhelmingly agree that reading and writing are important skills and generally indicated that they believe their students can make important gains. Teachers' beliefs about the malleability of reading and writing skills were related to their sense of self-efficacy in teaching those skills.

Для цитирования: Rodgers Derek B, Loveall Susan J. How special educators provide reading and writing instruction to secondary students with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A national survey of the United States of America.. Journal of intellectual & developmental disability. 2026. DOI: 10.3109/13668250.2026.2614681.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.