Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2025
Development and Initial Validation of the MCL-PRO-CAT: A computerized adaptive test designed to measure multifocal contact lens performance from the patient's perspective.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Albero-Ros Elsa, Lorente-Velázquez Amalia, Madrid-Costa David, González-Pérez Mariano
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To create a valid and reliable computer-adaptive testing (CAT) tool for assessing Multifocal Contact Lens (MCL) performance in presbyopic individuals, ensuring high precision. The self-administered tool will initially be accessible online in Spanish.
METHODS: Five steps were followed for the correct development of the instruments: item bank development, item refinement phase, item response theory calibration of the refined item bank, CAT simulations and design, and an initial validation study. A total of 1163 presbyopic patients were involved in the over-all study. Convergent validity was assessed by comparing results to the CLDQ-8 questionnaire, and repeatability assessment was performed two weeks after the initial completion.
RESULTS: The final item bank consisted of 108 items assessing various relevant domains for MCL performance evaluation. The calibration study showed a person separation index of 4.69 and a reliability of 0.96 along with a measurement precision of 0.27. The final CAT distinguished between 16 levels of MCL performance by presenting an average of 10.61 ± 1.00 items per patient, with an average completion time of 3:04 ± 1:24 min. Signs of convergent validity showed a correlation of 0.73 and repeatability was assessed showing an intraclass Correlation Coefficient of 0.881 with a 95% Confidence Interval 0,815-0,924, and Limits of Agreement of ± 1.07.
CONCLUSION: The MCL-PRO-CAT is a groundbreaking tool for evaluating MCL performance in presbyopic individuals. With automated scoring and fewer items, it was feasible, valid, and precise, enhancing clinical practicality.
METHODS: Five steps were followed for the correct development of the instruments: item bank development, item refinement phase, item response theory calibration of the refined item bank, CAT simulations and design, and an initial validation study. A total of 1163 presbyopic patients were involved in the over-all study. Convergent validity was assessed by comparing results to the CLDQ-8 questionnaire, and repeatability assessment was performed two weeks after the initial completion.
RESULTS: The final item bank consisted of 108 items assessing various relevant domains for MCL performance evaluation. The calibration study showed a person separation index of 4.69 and a reliability of 0.96 along with a measurement precision of 0.27. The final CAT distinguished between 16 levels of MCL performance by presenting an average of 10.61 ± 1.00 items per patient, with an average completion time of 3:04 ± 1:24 min. Signs of convergent validity showed a correlation of 0.73 and repeatability was assessed showing an intraclass Correlation Coefficient of 0.881 with a 95% Confidence Interval 0,815-0,924, and Limits of Agreement of ± 1.07.
CONCLUSION: The MCL-PRO-CAT is a groundbreaking tool for evaluating MCL performance in presbyopic individuals. With automated scoring and fewer items, it was feasible, valid, and precise, enhancing clinical practicality.