Journal of neurology · 2026
Admission hyperdense sinus sign predicts poorer outcomes in cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Honig Asaf, Eliahou Ruth, Simaan Naaem, Hallevi Hen, Metanis Issa, Mendel Rom, Barnea Rani, Auriel Eitan, Naftali Jonathan, Aladdin Shorooq, Orion David, Leker Ronen R, Molad Jeremy
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The hyperdense sinus sign (HDSS) is a readily identifiable non-contrast CT marker of acute thrombus in cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). We aimed to characterize HDSS associated features and prognostic significance.
METHODS: Data from prospective multicenter CVST registries was analysed. HDSS was defined as attenuation > 70 Hounsfield units within a thrombosed venous structure. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients with and without HDSS on admission CT. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of Excellent-Functional-Outcome (mRS 0-1) and remote seizures.
RESULTS: Among 465 patients (mean age 41.9 ± 18.4 years; 64.3% female), 178 (38.3%) exhibited HDSS. Patients with HDSS had higher rates of oral contraceptives use (28% vs 18%, p = 0.009), seizures at presentation (23% vs 14%, p = 0.015), superior sagittal (45% vs 35%, p = 0.028) and transverse sinus involvement (78% vs 67%, p = 0.01), deep venous thrombosis (8% vs 2%, p = 0.003), cortical vein thrombosis (19% vs 9%, p = 0.004), and multisite occlusion (34% vs 22%, p = 0.002). Parenchymal lesions were more common in HDSS patients, including intracerebral hemorrhage (27% vs 13%, p < 0.001) and venous infarction (22% vs 11%, p = 0.004). On day-90, HDSS was associated with lower Excellent-Functional-Outcome rates (71% vs 82%, p = 0.022), higher rates of remote seizures (9% vs 3%, p = 0.001), and similar recanalization rates. HDSS independently predicted reduced odds of Excellent-Functional-Outcome (OR = 0.491 [0.261-0.926], p = 0.028) and increased remote seizures (OR = 2.693 [1.057-6.861], p = 0.038).
CONCLUSIONS: HDSS identifies a CVST subgroup with more extensive thrombosis, greater parenchymal injury, and poorer outcomes, supporting its utility in early risk stratification.
METHODS: Data from prospective multicenter CVST registries was analysed. HDSS was defined as attenuation > 70 Hounsfield units within a thrombosed venous structure. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients with and without HDSS on admission CT. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of Excellent-Functional-Outcome (mRS 0-1) and remote seizures.
RESULTS: Among 465 patients (mean age 41.9 ± 18.4 years; 64.3% female), 178 (38.3%) exhibited HDSS. Patients with HDSS had higher rates of oral contraceptives use (28% vs 18%, p = 0.009), seizures at presentation (23% vs 14%, p = 0.015), superior sagittal (45% vs 35%, p = 0.028) and transverse sinus involvement (78% vs 67%, p = 0.01), deep venous thrombosis (8% vs 2%, p = 0.003), cortical vein thrombosis (19% vs 9%, p = 0.004), and multisite occlusion (34% vs 22%, p = 0.002). Parenchymal lesions were more common in HDSS patients, including intracerebral hemorrhage (27% vs 13%, p < 0.001) and venous infarction (22% vs 11%, p = 0.004). On day-90, HDSS was associated with lower Excellent-Functional-Outcome rates (71% vs 82%, p = 0.022), higher rates of remote seizures (9% vs 3%, p = 0.001), and similar recanalization rates. HDSS independently predicted reduced odds of Excellent-Functional-Outcome (OR = 0.491 [0.261-0.926], p = 0.028) and increased remote seizures (OR = 2.693 [1.057-6.861], p = 0.038).
CONCLUSIONS: HDSS identifies a CVST subgroup with more extensive thrombosis, greater parenchymal injury, and poorer outcomes, supporting its utility in early risk stratification.