MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/1806-9282.20260176

Медицинская библиотека · Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026

Family physicians' knowledge and attitudes toward rotavirus vaccination in Muğla, Türkiye.

Çakmak Büşra, Inanç Betul Battaloğlu

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and vaccination practices of family physicians in Muğla, Turkey, regarding rotavirus infection and vaccination.

METHODS

This descriptive cross-sectional study included family medicine residents and family physicians working in primary care settings in Muğla. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and Pearson chi-square tests. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Among the participants, 88.6% recommended at least one vaccine not included in the national immunization schedule, with rotavirus vaccine being the most frequently recommended (91.9%). Rotavirus vaccine knowledge scores were significantly associated with age and the recommendation of vaccines not included in the national immunization schedule (p<0.001). Physicians who had vaccinated their own children had significantly higher knowledge scores (p=0.011).

CONCLUSION

Although family physicians demonstrated adequate general knowledge of rotavirus infection, vaccine-related knowledge was insufficient. Knowledge level appears to play a key role in shaping vaccination attitudes and behaviors, highlighting the need for targeted continuing medical education.

Для цитирования: Çakmak Büşra, Inanç Betul Battaloğlu. Family physicians' knowledge and attitudes toward rotavirus vaccination in Muğla, Türkiye.. Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992). 2026. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20260176.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.