MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Ostomy/wound management · 2010

Prevalence of pressure ulcers in a Brazilian hospital: results of a cross-sectional study.

da Silva Cardoso Juliana Rosa, Blanes Leila, Augusto Calil Jose, Ferreira Chacon Julieta Maria, Masako Ferreira Lydia

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Technological advances in recent decades have extended survival time of critically ill hospitalized patients but their unstable physiological state and limited mobility increase their risk for pressure ulcers. On two different days (June 16 and October 20, 2004), pressure ulcer prevalence in patients hospitalized at the São Paulo Hospital, Brazil was assessed. On study day 1, 43 of the 376 inpatients (prevalence, 11.4%) and on study day 2, 35 of 340 inpatients (prevalence, 10.3%) had pressure ulcers. No significant differences in patient or ulcer characteristics between the two study days were observed. Ulcer prevalence was highest among patients in the intensive care unit (average 32.7%). Most patients had one ulcer (61.5%), classified as Stage II (47%), located in the sacral area (47%), and were considered at high risk according to their Braden Scale scores (60% had a score ≤ 11). The results obtained were not unexpected and confirmed the need to improve quality of care by establishing pressure ulcer prevention protocols. Additional studies to optimize prevention efforts and improve the existing evidence-base are necessary, especially in patient care units with high pressure ulcer rates.

Для цитирования: da Silva Cardoso Juliana Rosa, Blanes Leila, Augusto Calil Jose, Ferreira Chacon Julieta Maria, Masako Ferreira Lydia. Prevalence of pressure ulcers in a Brazilian hospital: results of a cross-sectional study.. Ostomy/wound management. 2010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.