Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis · 2022
Handheld ultrasound-guided cannulation of difficult hemodialysis arteriovenous access: A randomized controlled trial.
Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Shune, Liu Justin Shuang, Chai Chung Cheen, Si Chanjuan, Tan Si Hui, Ravindran Hanita Rajah, Martinez Ma Teresa Pedrosa, Gao Yang, Yeap Ying Ru, Liu Allen Yan Lun
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Cannulation of complex arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or graft (AVG) frequently poses challenges to renal nursing practice. Ultrasound (US) guidance on visualizing central and peripheral venous access has been widely adopted in nephrology, reducing vascular intervention complications. Renal nurses could acquire this point-of-care technique to increase the successful cannulation rate while facilitating confidence build-up during practice. We aim to evaluate the use of handheld US on difficult AVF/AVG cannulation in a hospital-based dialysis unit.
METHODS: We conducted a single-center randomized controlled trial from January 2021 to January 2022. Ten renal nurses were trained by an interventional nephrologist before patient recruitment and had completed a pre- and posttraining questionnaire on their confidence level. Fifty hemodialysis patients with complex AVF were randomized to US-guided or conventional cannulation. The total time spent on cannulation and patients' pain scores were also collected.
FINDINGS: Renal nurses increased their confidence level after training (pretraining score 26.6 ± 6.9 vs. posttraining score 36.4 ± 3.0; p = 0.014). There was a higher success rate (only one cannulation attempt required) for US-guided (96%) versus conventional (72.0%) cannulation (p = 0.049). US-guided cannulation had a lower pain score than the conventional method (1.48 ± 0.73 vs. 2.13 ± 0.95, p = 0.012). The pre-cannulation assessment time and time spent on cannulation were comparable between the two groups.
DISCUSSION: Our study showed that US-guided cannulation increased renal nurses' confidence level in difficult cannulation and improved success rate. Larger scale studies are required to further assess the applications of handheld US in AVF cannulation, particularly in different clinical settings (e.g., chronic dialysis centers).
METHODS: We conducted a single-center randomized controlled trial from January 2021 to January 2022. Ten renal nurses were trained by an interventional nephrologist before patient recruitment and had completed a pre- and posttraining questionnaire on their confidence level. Fifty hemodialysis patients with complex AVF were randomized to US-guided or conventional cannulation. The total time spent on cannulation and patients' pain scores were also collected.
FINDINGS: Renal nurses increased their confidence level after training (pretraining score 26.6 ± 6.9 vs. posttraining score 36.4 ± 3.0; p = 0.014). There was a higher success rate (only one cannulation attempt required) for US-guided (96%) versus conventional (72.0%) cannulation (p = 0.049). US-guided cannulation had a lower pain score than the conventional method (1.48 ± 0.73 vs. 2.13 ± 0.95, p = 0.012). The pre-cannulation assessment time and time spent on cannulation were comparable between the two groups.
DISCUSSION: Our study showed that US-guided cannulation increased renal nurses' confidence level in difficult cannulation and improved success rate. Larger scale studies are required to further assess the applications of handheld US in AVF cannulation, particularly in different clinical settings (e.g., chronic dialysis centers).