Cornea · 2021
Outcomes of Pseudophakic, Phakic, and Triple DMEK.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moshiri Isabella, Karimi-Golkar Damian, Schrittenlocher Silvia, Cursiefen Claus, Bachmann Björn
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of phakic and pseudophakic eyes treated by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) versus DMEK combined with cataract surgery (triple DMEK).
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study based on the prospective Cologne DMEK data base. This study is a single-center analysis of 62 eyes undergoing phakic (age mean ± SD 52 ± 6.43), 518 eyes undergoing pseudophakic (73.5 ± 8.57), and 557 eyes undergoing triple DMEK (67.93 ± 8.57). Outcome measures were changes in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), central corneal thickness, endothelial cell density (ECD), rebubbling rates within the first year after surgery, and the need for cataract surgery within the first 2 years after phakic DMEK.
RESULTS: The preoperative BSCVA (mean ± SD; logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) was 0.30 ± 0.22 in the phakic, 0.63 ± 0.45 in the pseudophakic, and 0.44 ± 0.30 in the triple DMEK group (P < 0.001), which changed to 0.09 ± 0.12, 0.14 ± 0.1, and 0.1 ± 0.1 (P < 0.001) 1 year after surgery, respectively. There was no difference in central corneal thickness (P = 0.929) and endothelial cell density (P = 0.606) 1 year postoperatively. Rebubbling rates in DMEK using SF6 20% for anterior chamber tamponade were not significantly different (P = 0.839). After phakic DMEK, 40% of eyes underwent cataract surgery within the second year. However, there was a high loss to follow-up in this group.
CONCLUSIONS: Phakic and triple DMEK procedures tend to have a better 1-year BSCVA than pseudophakic DMEK, with no differences in all other parameters analyzed. However, patients from the pseudophakic DMEK group were older and already had worse BSCVA before surgery.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study based on the prospective Cologne DMEK data base. This study is a single-center analysis of 62 eyes undergoing phakic (age mean ± SD 52 ± 6.43), 518 eyes undergoing pseudophakic (73.5 ± 8.57), and 557 eyes undergoing triple DMEK (67.93 ± 8.57). Outcome measures were changes in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), central corneal thickness, endothelial cell density (ECD), rebubbling rates within the first year after surgery, and the need for cataract surgery within the first 2 years after phakic DMEK.
RESULTS: The preoperative BSCVA (mean ± SD; logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) was 0.30 ± 0.22 in the phakic, 0.63 ± 0.45 in the pseudophakic, and 0.44 ± 0.30 in the triple DMEK group (P < 0.001), which changed to 0.09 ± 0.12, 0.14 ± 0.1, and 0.1 ± 0.1 (P < 0.001) 1 year after surgery, respectively. There was no difference in central corneal thickness (P = 0.929) and endothelial cell density (P = 0.606) 1 year postoperatively. Rebubbling rates in DMEK using SF6 20% for anterior chamber tamponade were not significantly different (P = 0.839). After phakic DMEK, 40% of eyes underwent cataract surgery within the second year. However, there was a high loss to follow-up in this group.
CONCLUSIONS: Phakic and triple DMEK procedures tend to have a better 1-year BSCVA than pseudophakic DMEK, with no differences in all other parameters analyzed. However, patients from the pseudophakic DMEK group were older and already had worse BSCVA before surgery.