American journal of surgery · 2025
Selective visualization of the recurrent laryngeal nerve during parathyroidectomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Robson Chase Marina E, Donoho Mackenzie, Fackelmayer Oliver J, Inabnet William B, Lee Cortney Y, Sloan David A
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Direct visualization of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is considered the gold standard for avoiding nerve injury during parathyroidectomy. We hypothesize that with routine intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM), RLN visualization is not mandatory for safe parathyroidectomy.
METHODS: Following institutional review board approval, adult patients undergoing parathyroidectomy using IONM during a two-year period were reviewed. The RLN was only visualized if exposed during parathyroid gland dissection. Outcomes included the rate of nerve visualization and rates of RLN injury.
RESULTS: 240 of 479 (50.1 %) nerves at risk were visualized. There was loss of signal in three cases where the RLN was visually identified and none in non-visualized cases. The rates of temporary and permanent RLN injury were 0.99 % and 0 %, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Routine IONM provides reassurance of nerve integrity in cases where the RLN is not visualized and an acceptably low rate of RLN injury is achieved with selective visualization.
METHODS: Following institutional review board approval, adult patients undergoing parathyroidectomy using IONM during a two-year period were reviewed. The RLN was only visualized if exposed during parathyroid gland dissection. Outcomes included the rate of nerve visualization and rates of RLN injury.
RESULTS: 240 of 479 (50.1 %) nerves at risk were visualized. There was loss of signal in three cases where the RLN was visually identified and none in non-visualized cases. The rates of temporary and permanent RLN injury were 0.99 % and 0 %, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Routine IONM provides reassurance of nerve integrity in cases where the RLN is not visualized and an acceptably low rate of RLN injury is achieved with selective visualization.