Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2014
Does diffuse irrigation result in improved radiofrequency catheter ablation? A prospective randomized study of right atrial typical flutter ablation.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ramoul Khaled, Wright Matthew, Sohal Manav, Shah Ashok, Castro-Rodriguez Jose, Verbeet Thierry, Knecht Sébastien
Аннотация
AIMS: Recent developments of open irrigated catheters have sought to create uniform cooling of the entire ablating electrode. The aim of this randomized study was to assess whether the diffuse irrigation of the Coolflex(®) (CF) catheter results in improved short-term procedural benefits in patients undergoing ablation of right atrial typical flutter.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty consecutive patients (age 62 ± 13) with typical atrial flutter were prospectively randomized to ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) using either a standard 3.5 mm tip ablation catheter with six distal irrigation channels (6C) (30 patients) or a 4 mm tip fully irrigated ablation catheter (CF) (30 patients). There were no significant differences seen between procedures performed with the diffusely irrigated CF catheter and the standard six-channel irrigated-tip catheter. This concerned the total procedural duration RF duration, fluoroscopic duration, the total amount of irrigation fluid, and the occurrence of steam pop.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a diffuse irrigation at the ablation catheter tip does neither facilitate lesion formation nor reduce the amount of irrigation during RF ablation for typical right atrial flutter using recommended flow and power settings.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty consecutive patients (age 62 ± 13) with typical atrial flutter were prospectively randomized to ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) using either a standard 3.5 mm tip ablation catheter with six distal irrigation channels (6C) (30 patients) or a 4 mm tip fully irrigated ablation catheter (CF) (30 patients). There were no significant differences seen between procedures performed with the diffusely irrigated CF catheter and the standard six-channel irrigated-tip catheter. This concerned the total procedural duration RF duration, fluoroscopic duration, the total amount of irrigation fluid, and the occurrence of steam pop.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a diffuse irrigation at the ablation catheter tip does neither facilitate lesion formation nor reduce the amount of irrigation during RF ablation for typical right atrial flutter using recommended flow and power settings.