MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/23969873251315362

Медицинская библиотека · European stroke journal · 2025

The 6-months follow-up of the TREAT-CAD trial: Aspirin versus anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with cervical artery dissection.

Engelter Stefan T, Enz Lukas S, Ravanelli Flavia, Kaufmann Josefin E, Gensicke Henrik, Schaedelin Sabine, Luft Andreas R, Globas Christoph, Goeggel-Simonetti Barbara, Fischer Urs, Strambo Davide, Kägi Georg, Nedeltchev Krassen, Kahles Timo, Kellert Lars, Rosenbaum Sverre, von Rennenberg Regina, Brehm Alex, Seiffge David, Renaud Susanne, Brandt Tobias, Sarikaya Hakan, Zietz Annaelle, Wischmann Johannes, Polymeris Alexandros A, Fischer Sandro, Bonati Leo H, De Marchis Gian Marco, Peters Nils, Nolte Christian H, Christensen Hanne, Wegener Susanne, Psychogios Marios-Nikos, Arnold Marcel, Lyrer Philippe, Traenka Christopher

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеEquivalence TrialПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Cervical artery dissection is a major cause of stroke in the young. The optimal choice and duration of antithrombotic treatment for stroke prevention are debated, particularly beyond 3 months after symptom onset.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

TREAT-CAD (TREATment of Cervical Artery Dissection) was a randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment comparing non-inferiority of aspirin to anticoagulation (Vitamin-K-antagonists) in participants with symptomatic, Magnetic-Resonance-(MR)-imaging-verified cervical artery dissection. TREAT-CAD could not establish non-inferiority of aspirin to anticoagulation at 3 months. Thereafter participants could continue antithrombotic medication and obtained a standardized assessment of clinical and MR-Imaging outcomes between 3 and 6 months. As crossover to the other treatment arm was possible, we performed an as-treated analysis as main analysis. The main outcomes were new clinical (ischemic stroke, intracranial/major extracranial bleeding, or death) and new MR-Imaging outcomes (ischemic or hemorrhagic brain lesions).

RESULTS

Among the 122 participants in the as-treated analysis, 3/93 (3.2%) aspirin-treated participants had new clinical (n = 1) and MRI-outcomes (n = 2) between 3 and 6 months while 1/29 (3.4%) anticoagulated participants had an MRI-outcome (n = 1). All outcome events were hemorrhagic while ischemic events were absent. No deaths occurred. This yields an absolute difference of 0.2% (95% CI -8.0% to 7.5%, p = 1.0).

DISCUSSION AND

CONCLUSION

During the extended follow-up period of a controlled randomized trial comparing aspirin to anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection, outcomes between 3 and 6 months after randomization occurred rarely, similarly often in both groups and were exclusively hemorrhagic events. Thus, studies balancing benefits versus harms of antithrombotic treatment beyond 3 months are warranted.

REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02046460. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02046460.

Для цитирования: Engelter Stefan T, Enz Lukas S, Ravanelli Flavia, Kaufmann Josefin E, Gensicke Henrik, Schaedelin Sabine, Luft Andreas R, Globas Christoph, Goeggel-Simonetti Barbara, Fischer Urs, Strambo Davide, Kägi Georg, Nedeltchev Krassen, Kahles Timo, Kellert Lars, Rosenbaum Sverre, von Rennenberg Regina, Brehm Alex, Seiffge David, Renaud Susanne, Brandt Tobias, Sarikaya Hakan, Zietz Annaelle, Wischmann Johannes, Polymeris Alexandros A, Fischer Sandro, Bonati Leo H, De Marchis Gian Marco, Peters Nils, Nolte Christian H, Christensen Hanne, Wegener Susanne, Psychogios Marios-Nikos, Arnold Marcel, Lyrer Philippe, Traenka Christopher. The 6-months follow-up of the TREAT-CAD trial: Aspirin versus anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with cervical artery dissection.. European stroke journal. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/23969873251315362.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.