Urologia internationalis · 2026
Enhanced Pressure Management Using an Upgraded Vacuum-Assisted Ureteroscopic System: Experimental Validation and Predictive Modeling.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zuo Ying-Tong, Qu Bo-Lun, Zou Peng, Liu Tong-Zu, Wu Zhong-Hua
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pressure-control performance and irrigation efficiency of an upgraded vacuum-assisted ureteroscopic system (VA-URS) compared with traditional ureteroscopy (T-URS) using an in vitro kidney model.
METHODS: An artificial renal pelvis model was used to simulate ureteroscopy under varying irrigation pressures (50, 100, 150 cmH2O) and flow rates (30-50 mL/min). Intrapelvic pressure and effective irrigation flow rates were continuously recorded. Three-way ANOVA assessed the influence of surgical method, irrigation pressure, and flow rate, while multiple regression models quantified pressure-parameter relationships.
RESULTS: VA-URS consistently produced lower intrapelvic pressures than T-URS across all settings. At 50 cmH2O with 30 mL/min, pressures were -21.47 ± 1.86 cmH2O versus 24.73 ± 1.56 cmH2O (p < 0.01). At 150 cmH2O with 50 mL/min, values were 50.13 ± 2.14 cmH2O versus 61.53 ± 1.27 cmH2O (p < 0.01). Effective irrigation flow was also higher with VA-URS (24.50 ± 0.79 vs. 20.40 ± 0.70 mL/min at 50 cmH2O/30 mL/min; p < 0.01). Regression modeling demonstrated strong predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.984 for VA-URS) and distinct pressure-flow dynamics compared with T-URS.
CONCLUSIONS: The upgraded VA-URS system significantly enhances intrapelvic pressure management and irrigation efficiency compared with T-URS in this in vitro model. These bench findings support further translational evaluation; however, animal and clinical studies are required to confirm clinical benefit and safety.
METHODS: An artificial renal pelvis model was used to simulate ureteroscopy under varying irrigation pressures (50, 100, 150 cmH2O) and flow rates (30-50 mL/min). Intrapelvic pressure and effective irrigation flow rates were continuously recorded. Three-way ANOVA assessed the influence of surgical method, irrigation pressure, and flow rate, while multiple regression models quantified pressure-parameter relationships.
RESULTS: VA-URS consistently produced lower intrapelvic pressures than T-URS across all settings. At 50 cmH2O with 30 mL/min, pressures were -21.47 ± 1.86 cmH2O versus 24.73 ± 1.56 cmH2O (p < 0.01). At 150 cmH2O with 50 mL/min, values were 50.13 ± 2.14 cmH2O versus 61.53 ± 1.27 cmH2O (p < 0.01). Effective irrigation flow was also higher with VA-URS (24.50 ± 0.79 vs. 20.40 ± 0.70 mL/min at 50 cmH2O/30 mL/min; p < 0.01). Regression modeling demonstrated strong predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.984 for VA-URS) and distinct pressure-flow dynamics compared with T-URS.
CONCLUSIONS: The upgraded VA-URS system significantly enhances intrapelvic pressure management and irrigation efficiency compared with T-URS in this in vitro model. These bench findings support further translational evaluation; however, animal and clinical studies are required to confirm clinical benefit and safety.