DOI 10.1080/15622975.2026.2720930
Advances in non-invasive brain stimulation for borderline personality disorder: clinical targets and future directions - an updated narrative review.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) remains a major therapeutic challenge, given incomplete response to first-line psychotherapies and limited treatment accessibility. Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS), particularly repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), has emerged as promising interventions.
METHODS
This narrative review provides an updated overview of recent evidence on NIBS in BPD, focusing on: new tDCS studies, NIBS to improve interpersonal dysfunction and social cognition, the combination between NIBS and psychotherapies, and the role of comorbid BPD as a moderating factor on NIBS outcomes.
RESULTS
Preliminary evidence supports a symptom-oriented application of NIBS in BPD: right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) stimulation appears mainly associated with improvements in impulsivity, whereas left DLPFC stimulation improves emotion regulation and cold cognitive functioning. Emerging studies targeting the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex suggest beneficial effects on rejection-related emotional responses and interpersonal sensitivity. Studies combining NIBS with psychotherapy show acceptable feasibility profiles, although additive effects remain uncertain. Available evidence also suggests that comorbid BPD may not substantially impair antidepressant response to NIBS.
CONCLUSIONS
NIBS represents a promising adjunctive intervention for BPD. However, larger sham-controlled trials, biomarker-informed studies, replication studies, and long-term follow-up assessments are needed before definitive clinical recommendations can be established.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.