Indian heart journal · 2025
Validation of complete and shortened WHO Rose angina questionnaire to detect coronary heart disease in a tertiary care hospital.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vijay Soorampally, Kidambi Bharat Raj, Naik Nitish, Singh Sandeep, Sharma Gautam, S Ramakrishnan, Roy Ambuj
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Validation of the complete and shortened RAQ to detect coronary heart disease (CHD) in a tertiary care hospital.
METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 239 patients aged 40-75 years with chest pain, referred for TMT from the cardiology OPD were subjected to RAQ and SRAQ, followed by a treadmill test (TMT). We used the treadmill test with the Bruce/modified Bruce protocol as the gold standard to assess RAQ and SRAQ.
RESULTS: The RAQ had 44.3 % sensitivity, 72.6 % specificity, 59 % accuracy, 60 %, and 58.4 % positive and negative predictive values, 1.62, 0.77 positive and negative likelihood ratios, respectively. SRAQ had 87.8 % sensitivity, 27.4 % specificity, 56.5 % accuracy, 52.9 % and 70.8 % positive and negative predictive values, 1.21 and 0.44 positive, and negative likelihood ratios, respectively, to detect CHD. The sensitivity of RAQ and SRAQ was higher in women.
CONCLUSION: Both RAQ and SRAQ have poor accuracy in diagnosing CHD in the Indian population. Alternate tools are needed for determining the population burden of CHD in India.
METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 239 patients aged 40-75 years with chest pain, referred for TMT from the cardiology OPD were subjected to RAQ and SRAQ, followed by a treadmill test (TMT). We used the treadmill test with the Bruce/modified Bruce protocol as the gold standard to assess RAQ and SRAQ.
RESULTS: The RAQ had 44.3 % sensitivity, 72.6 % specificity, 59 % accuracy, 60 %, and 58.4 % positive and negative predictive values, 1.62, 0.77 positive and negative likelihood ratios, respectively. SRAQ had 87.8 % sensitivity, 27.4 % specificity, 56.5 % accuracy, 52.9 % and 70.8 % positive and negative predictive values, 1.21 and 0.44 positive, and negative likelihood ratios, respectively, to detect CHD. The sensitivity of RAQ and SRAQ was higher in women.
CONCLUSION: Both RAQ and SRAQ have poor accuracy in diagnosing CHD in the Indian population. Alternate tools are needed for determining the population burden of CHD in India.