Preserving the pulmonary valve in Tetralogy of Fallot repair: Reconsidering the indication for valve-sparing.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair is a frequent procedure, and although valve-sparing (VS) repair is preferred, determining which patients can successfully undergo this operation remains controversial. We sought to identify parameters to determine a selective, accurate indication for VS repair.
METHODS
We reviewed 71 patients (82%) undergoing VS repair. We analyzed hemodynamic data, intraoperative reports, and follow-up echocardiography results to identify acceptable indications. Patients requiring pulmonary valve (PV) reintervention versus no reintervention were compared.
RESULTS
PV annulus size at repair was z-score of -2.0 (-5.3, 1.3). Approximately half (51%) had a z-score less than -2. Cox regression results showed this was not a risk factor for reintervention (p = .59). Overall, 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year freedom from PV reintervention rates were 95.8%, 92.8%, 91% and 77.8%, respectively. Residual pulmonary stenosis (PS) at initial repair was relatively higher in the reintervention group compared with no reintervention group (40 [28, 51] mmHg vs. 30 [22, 37] mmHg; p = .08). For patients with residual PS, pressure gradient (PG) was consistent over time across both groups (PV reintervention: -3 [-15, 8] mmHg vs. no reintervention: 0 [-9, 8] mmHg). The risk of PV reintervention is 3.7-fold higher when the PG from intraoperative TEE is greater than 45 mmHg (p = .04).
CONCLUSIONS
Our review of the midterm outcomes of expanded indication for VS suggests intraoperative decision to convert to transannular patch is warranted if intraoperative postprocedure TEE PG is greater than 45 mmHg or RV pressure is higher than half of systemic pressure to prevent reintervention.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.