Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2012
Corneal collagen cross-linking: ectasia and beyond.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Suri Kunal, Hammersmith Kristin M, Nagra Parveen K
Аннотация
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Corneal collagen cross-linking has recently emerged as a novel approach for management of ectasia. This article reviews the literature published in the past 3 years about the expanding spectrum of cross-linking as a therapeutic modality and its complications.
RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have confirmed the beneficial effects of cross-linking in stabilization and to a lesser extent, regression of keratoconus and postrefractive surgery ectasia. Other applications include cross-linking as a combined procedure with intracorneal ring segments, and photorefractive keratectomy for ectasia, corneal edema, and infectious keratitis. Animal studies of chemical cross-linking of sclera as a potential treatment for progressive myopia have also been performed. Various modifications of the technique to increase the safety profile of cross-linking have been reported, including the use of hypoosmolar riboflavin, transepithelial cross-linking, customized epithelial debridement, and higher fluence shorter duration ultraviolet A light exposure. Reported complications include keratitis, corneal haze, endothelial cell loss and failure of treatment.
SUMMARY: Cross-linking has been shown to be an effective modality for corneal ectasia, the regression being less in patients with postrefractive ectasia than keratoconus. In a few studies, it has been found to be effective in symptomatic improvement of bullous keratopathy, and infectious keratitis but further studies are required. Cross-linking with epithelial debridement is found to be most effective but various modifications are being investigated for an improved, and better safety outcome.
RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have confirmed the beneficial effects of cross-linking in stabilization and to a lesser extent, regression of keratoconus and postrefractive surgery ectasia. Other applications include cross-linking as a combined procedure with intracorneal ring segments, and photorefractive keratectomy for ectasia, corneal edema, and infectious keratitis. Animal studies of chemical cross-linking of sclera as a potential treatment for progressive myopia have also been performed. Various modifications of the technique to increase the safety profile of cross-linking have been reported, including the use of hypoosmolar riboflavin, transepithelial cross-linking, customized epithelial debridement, and higher fluence shorter duration ultraviolet A light exposure. Reported complications include keratitis, corneal haze, endothelial cell loss and failure of treatment.
SUMMARY: Cross-linking has been shown to be an effective modality for corneal ectasia, the regression being less in patients with postrefractive ectasia than keratoconus. In a few studies, it has been found to be effective in symptomatic improvement of bullous keratopathy, and infectious keratitis but further studies are required. Cross-linking with epithelial debridement is found to be most effective but various modifications are being investigated for an improved, and better safety outcome.