Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
Bile Acid Sequestrants in Microscopic Colitis: Clinical Outcomes and Utility of Bile Acid Testing.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tome June, Sehgal Kanika, Kamboj Amrit K, Harmsen William S, Khanna Sahil, Pardi Darrell S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Bile acid sequestrants (BAS) may be a treatment in microscopic colitis (MC), but efficacy data are limited. We evaluated the effectiveness of BAS in MC and assessed the utility of bile acid testing to predict response.
METHODS: Adults with MC treated with BAS (2010-2020) at Mayo Clinic were identified. Bile acid malabsorption was defined by elevated serum 7⍺-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one or by fecal testing using previously validated cutoffs. Response was defined at 12 ± 4 weeks after BAS initiation as: complete (resolution of diarrhea), partial (≥50% improvement in diarrhea), nonresponse (<50% improvement), and intolerance (discontinuation due to side effects). Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of response to BAS.
RESULTS: We identified 282 patients (median age, 59 years [range, 20-87 years]; 88.3% women) with median follow-up of 4.5 years (range, 0.4-9.1 years). Patients were treated with the following BAS: 64.9% cholestyramine, 21.6% colesevelam, and 13.5% colestipol. Clinical outcomes were: 49.3% complete response, 16.3% partial response, 24.8% nonresponse, and 9.6% intolerance. There were no differences in outcomes between those on BAS alone or BAS combined with other medications (P = .98). The dose of BAS was not associated with response (P = .51). Bile acid testing was done in 31.9% of patients, and 56.7% were positive. No predictors of response to BAS were identified. After BAS discontinuation, 41.6% had recurrence at a median of 21 weeks (range, 1-172 weeks).
CONCLUSION: In one of the largest cohorts evaluating BAS treatment in MC, nearly two-thirds had a partial or complete response. Additional research is needed to determine the role of BAS and bile acid malabsorption in MC.
METHODS: Adults with MC treated with BAS (2010-2020) at Mayo Clinic were identified. Bile acid malabsorption was defined by elevated serum 7⍺-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one or by fecal testing using previously validated cutoffs. Response was defined at 12 ± 4 weeks after BAS initiation as: complete (resolution of diarrhea), partial (≥50% improvement in diarrhea), nonresponse (<50% improvement), and intolerance (discontinuation due to side effects). Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of response to BAS.
RESULTS: We identified 282 patients (median age, 59 years [range, 20-87 years]; 88.3% women) with median follow-up of 4.5 years (range, 0.4-9.1 years). Patients were treated with the following BAS: 64.9% cholestyramine, 21.6% colesevelam, and 13.5% colestipol. Clinical outcomes were: 49.3% complete response, 16.3% partial response, 24.8% nonresponse, and 9.6% intolerance. There were no differences in outcomes between those on BAS alone or BAS combined with other medications (P = .98). The dose of BAS was not associated with response (P = .51). Bile acid testing was done in 31.9% of patients, and 56.7% were positive. No predictors of response to BAS were identified. After BAS discontinuation, 41.6% had recurrence at a median of 21 weeks (range, 1-172 weeks).
CONCLUSION: In one of the largest cohorts evaluating BAS treatment in MC, nearly two-thirds had a partial or complete response. Additional research is needed to determine the role of BAS and bile acid malabsorption in MC.