Journal of environmental radioactivity · 2026
Environmental absorbed-dose quantities for natural radionuclides in soil using a simplified block phantom with an ICRP 110 comparison.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ajaz Muhammad, Alrebdi Haifa I, Younis Hannan, Al-Mugren K S
Аннотация
Natural radionuclides in soil produce an outdoor photon field, but an organ absorbed dose also depends on source depth, body geometry, scored mass, emission data and charged-particle transport settings. This work calculates absorbed-dose quantities in defined scoring regions for 40K, the 238U decay series and the 232Th decay series with Geant4 and a simplified block phantom. The Geant4 source uses the full nuclear gamma-emission library recovered from the adopted RadioactiveDecay6.1.2 and PhotonEvaporation6.1.2 data. The production calculation consisted of 20 independent replicas and 4.0×109 source histories. Source-specific results are absorbed-dose-rate coefficients, while the adopted-mixture results are scored-region dose rates for the stated activity mixture. The outdoor photon field was compared with a matched FLUKA calculation. The median FLUKA/Geant4 spectral ratio was 1.001 for the silicon-reference case and 0.993 for the realistic-soil case, with most matched nonzero spectral bins within a factor of two. The Geant4 scored-region results give 8 strong, 11 acceptable, 7 low-precision and 2 unresolved scored-region/source quantities by independent-replica uncertainty. Low-precision and unresolved quantities are reported with their precision labels and are not used as stable coefficients. A complementary calculation with the ICRP 110 adult male and female reference phantoms compared the lungs, stomach and colon regions; the ICRP 110/simplified-phantom reconstructed-dose ratios ranged from 0.98 to 1.22. The main coefficient set remains specific to the simplified geometry and is not presented as a set of ICRP reference-phantom coefficients. The added ICRP 110 calculation is limited to the comparison of corresponding lung, stomach and colon regions.