Robot-Assisted Cystectomy and Ileal Conduit for Neurogenic Bladder: Comparison of Extracorporeal vs Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion.

Objectives

The aim of the present study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of extracorporeal (EXTRA) vs intracorporeal (INTRA) urinary diversion in patients undergoing robotic cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder.

Methods

All consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder in six centers between 2011 and 2020 were included in a retrospective study. Four centers performed exclusively INTRA urinary diversion all over the study period, one center performed exclusively EXTRA urinary diversion, and the last center performed EXTRA urinary diversion during a first period and INTRA during the subsequent period.

Results

Ninety-seven patients were included: 66 in the EXTRA group and 31 in the INTRA group. There were 11 major (Clavien grade ≥3) postoperative complications in the overall population (11.3%) with no statistically significant difference between both groups (EXTRA = 12.1% vs INTRA = 9.7%; p = 0.99). The mean length of stay did not differ significantly between INTRA and EXTRA (13.1 vs 14.1 days; p = 0.44). The mean times to oral feeding and to return of bowel function were similar in the two groups (3.9 vs 3.5 days; p = 0.28 and 4.1 vs 4.1 days; p = 0.51, respectively). There was no incisional hernia in the INTRA group vs five in the EXTRA group (0% vs 7.6%; p = 0.17).

Conclusion

The perioperative morbidity of robotic cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder appears to be relatively limited compared with the historical open series. Possibly due to the relatively small sample size, no difference was found between INTRA and EXTRA urinary diversion in terms of perioperative outcomes.