Impact of current clinical guidelines on the management of invasive fungal disease.

Isavuconazole is a new broad-spectrum antifungal triazole with a better safety profile in terms of drug-drug interactions, adverse effects, and tolerance compared to other azoles. Increasing evidence supports the usefulness of isavuconazole in the treatment of invasive fungal diseases. In this review, we aim to analyze the influence of this new evidence on the main clinical guidelines. We reviewed the most recent consensus guidelines issued by the major infectious diseases societies worldwide, focusing on the novelties regarding the recommendations for the use of isavuconazole in different invasive fungal infections and management strategies. Isavuconazole has been included as first-line therapy for invasive aspergillosis, with slight differences in preference for voriconazole or isavuconazole depending on the clinical scenario. In mucormycosis, isavuconazole is considered an alternative first-line therapy to liposomal amphotericin B, especially in those patients with underlying renal impairment. Additionally, the use of isavuconazole is suggested in salvage scenario for both conditions, and the combination with other mold-active drugs is considered. The guidelines report the promising results obtained with the use of this drug for treating mycoses caused by other molds and rare yeasts, as well as endemic mycoses, but since solid evidence is still lacking, the recommendations in this area are generally weak. Isavuconazole is a suitable therapeutic option for invasive fungal infections, offering efficacy against a range of pathogens, including Aspergillus and fungi within the order Mucorales. Its safety profile and its favorable drug interaction profile make it a valuable alternative to traditional agents like voriconazole or liposomal amphotericin B in certain scenarios. However, continued research is essential to better understand its role in combination therapies and to assess its effectiveness against other fungal species.