Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
Resilience and self-efficacy as buffers of the impact of combat stress on psychosomatic symptoms in military personnel: A moderation analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kokun Oleg, Vietrov Serhii, Serdiuk Liudmyla, Yavorska-Vietrova Iryna
Аннотация
This study examined how combat exposure, continuous traumatic stress reactions, and personal resources (resilience and general self-efficacy) relate to somatic complaints in military personnel with psychosomatic disorders, and whether resilience and self-efficacy buffer the impact of combat exposure. Participants were 107 Ukrainian service members (94% men) hospitalized in a psychoneurological department of psychosomatic disorders at a clinical hospital. They completed measures of combat exposure (CES), continuous traumatic stress (CTSR), resilience (CD-RISC-10), general self-efficacy (GSE), and somatic complaints (GBB-24). Hierarchical regressions predicted somatic complaints from CES, CTSR, resilience, and self-efficacy, controlling for age, sex, rank, and injury indicators; moderation was tested with CES × Resilience and CES × Self-efficacy terms, as well as a combined model including both moderators. Continuous traumatic stress reactions showed a strong positive association with somatic complaints and remained the most powerful predictor in all models. Combat exposure was weakly related to somatic complaints and became non-significant after adjustment. Resilience and self-efficacy correlated negatively with CTSR and somatic complaints. In multivariable analyses, the evidence was clearer for a moderating role of general self-efficacy than for resilience: higher GSE attenuated the positive link between CES and somatic symptoms, whereas the CES × Resilience interaction was not supported in this sample. Among service members with psychosomatic disorders, these findings indicate that continuous traumatic stress reactions are a central correlate of somatic symptom burden, while general self-efficacy emerges as an important protective resource. Psychosomatic rehabilitation should address ongoing traumatic stress and strengthen self-efficacy as a modifiable target within integrated care.