Attention in action and perception: Unitary or separate mechanisms of selectivity?

What is the relation between the two visual stream hypothesis and selective visual attention? In this chapter, we first consider this question at a theoretical level before presenting an example of work from our lab that examines the question: Under what conditions does the emotional content of a visual object influence visually guided action? Previous research has demonstrated that fear can influence perception, both consciously and unconsciously, but it is unclear when fear influences visually guided action. The study tested participants with varying degrees of spiderphobia on two visually guided pointing tasks, while manipulating the emotional valence of the target (positive and negative) and the cognitive load of the participant (single vs dual task). Participants rapidly moved their finger from a home position to a suddenly appearing target image on a touch screen. The images were emotionally negative (e.g., spiders and scorpions) or positive (e.g., flowers and food). In order to test the effect of emotional valence on the online control of the reach, the target either remained static or jumped to a new location. In both the single and dual tasks, a stream of digits were presented on the screen near the finger's starting location, but only in the dual task were participants asked to identify a letter somewhere in the stream. In the single task, increased fear of spiders reduced the speed and accuracy of the movement. In the dual task, increased fear impaired letter identification, but pointing actions were now equally efficient for low- and high-fear participants. These results imply that the finger's autopilot is influenced by emotional content only when attention can be fully devoted to the identification of the emotion-evoking images. As such, the results support the view that the mechanisms of selection are not the same in the two visual streams.