Frontiers in neurology · 2023
Cohort analysis of novel SPAST variants in SPG4 patients and implementation of in vitro and in vivo studies to identify the pathogenic mechanism caused by splicing mutations.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ferese Rosangela, Scala Simona, Suppa Antonio, Campopiano Rosa, Asci Francesco, Zampogna Alessandro, Chiaravalloti Maria Antonietta, Griguoli Annamaria, Storto Marianna, Pardo Alba Di, Giardina Emiliano, Zampatti Stefania, Fornai Francesco, Novelli Giuseppe, Fanelli Mirco, Zecca Chiara, Logroscino Giancarlo, Centonze Diego, Gambardella Stefano
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Pure hereditary spastic paraplegia (SPG) type 4 (SPG4) is caused by mutations of SPAST gene. This study aimed to analyze SPAST variants in SPG4 patients to highlight the occurrence of splicing mutations and combine functional studies to assess the relevance of these variants in the molecular mechanisms of the disease.
METHODS: We performed an NGS panel in 105 patients, in silico analysis for splicing mutations, and in vitro minigene assay.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The NGS panel was applied to screen 105 patients carrying a clinical phenotype corresponding to upper motor neuron syndrome (UMNS), selectively affecting motor control of lower limbs. Pathogenic mutations in SPAST were identified in 12 patients (11.42%), 5 missense, 3 frameshift, and 4 splicing variants. Then, we focused on the patients carrying splicing variants using a combined approach of in silico and in vitro analysis through minigene assay and RNA, if available. For two splicing variants (i.e., c.1245+1G>A and c.1414-2A>T), functional assays confirm the types of molecular alterations suggested by the in silico analysis (loss of exon 9 and exon 12). In contrast, the splicing variant c.1005-1delG differed from what was predicted (skipping exon 7), and the functional study indicates the loss of frame and formation of a premature stop codon. The present study evidenced the high splice variants in SPG4 patients and indicated the relevance of functional assays added to in silico analysis to decipher the pathogenic mechanism.
METHODS: We performed an NGS panel in 105 patients, in silico analysis for splicing mutations, and in vitro minigene assay.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The NGS panel was applied to screen 105 patients carrying a clinical phenotype corresponding to upper motor neuron syndrome (UMNS), selectively affecting motor control of lower limbs. Pathogenic mutations in SPAST were identified in 12 patients (11.42%), 5 missense, 3 frameshift, and 4 splicing variants. Then, we focused on the patients carrying splicing variants using a combined approach of in silico and in vitro analysis through minigene assay and RNA, if available. For two splicing variants (i.e., c.1245+1G>A and c.1414-2A>T), functional assays confirm the types of molecular alterations suggested by the in silico analysis (loss of exon 9 and exon 12). In contrast, the splicing variant c.1005-1delG differed from what was predicted (skipping exon 7), and the functional study indicates the loss of frame and formation of a premature stop codon. The present study evidenced the high splice variants in SPG4 patients and indicated the relevance of functional assays added to in silico analysis to decipher the pathogenic mechanism.