Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026
Transcatheter Versus Minimally Invasive Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement With Rapid-Deployment Valves: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Werner Paul, Winter Martin, Krall Christoph, Rosenhek Raphael, Kahrovic Amila, Kocher Alfred, Zimpfer Daniel, Andreas Martin, Coti Iuliana
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates intermediate-term survival and valve-related complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgical aortic valve replacement (MI-SAVR) using rapid-deployment (RD) valves compared with those receiving transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR) after propensity-matched analysis.
METHODS: All consecutive patients treated with either isolated MI-SAVR with an RD valve or TF-TAVR at a single cardiac-surgery centre were retrospectively reviewed. A propensity score was created, and exact matching was applied after the maximum propensity score difference. Nearest-neighbour matching was conducted with a caliper of 0.2 standard deviations of the logit of the propensity score, without replacement and with a 1:1 matching ratio.
RESULTS: From April 2011 to June 2022, 926 patients underwent either isolated MI-SAVR with an RD valve (n = 400) or TF-TAVR (n = 526). After propensity score matching, the final cohort (n = 366) included 183 matched pairs. Operative mortality was 0% after MI-SAVR compared with 3.3% (n = 6) following TF-TAVR (P = .03). Perioperative stroke occurred in 2.7% (n = 5, MI-SAVR) vs 2.2% (n = 4, TF-TAVR, P = 1). At 3 years, MI-SAVR was associated with significantly lower rates of paravalvular leakage (2.2% vs 13.8%, P < .001), new pacemaker implantations (6.6% vs 14.8%, P = .01) and a composite end-point of thromboembolic and major bleeding events (7.2% vs 12.7%, P = .025). No difference between aortic valve re-interventions and stroke was identified between groups. Survival at 1- and 3-year follow-up was 98% and 88% (MI-SAVR) and 88% and 67% (TF-TAVR) respectively (P < .001). EuroScore II emerged as an independent predictor of mortality (HR 1.12 [1.02, 1.23], P = .014).
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive SAVR with RD-valves could represent a treatment modality to TF-TAVR for severe AS in an older, low-risk patient cohort. In our retrospective cohort study, MI-SAVR was linked to improved survival and lower rates of permanent pacemaker implantation and paravalvular leakage.
METHODS: All consecutive patients treated with either isolated MI-SAVR with an RD valve or TF-TAVR at a single cardiac-surgery centre were retrospectively reviewed. A propensity score was created, and exact matching was applied after the maximum propensity score difference. Nearest-neighbour matching was conducted with a caliper of 0.2 standard deviations of the logit of the propensity score, without replacement and with a 1:1 matching ratio.
RESULTS: From April 2011 to June 2022, 926 patients underwent either isolated MI-SAVR with an RD valve (n = 400) or TF-TAVR (n = 526). After propensity score matching, the final cohort (n = 366) included 183 matched pairs. Operative mortality was 0% after MI-SAVR compared with 3.3% (n = 6) following TF-TAVR (P = .03). Perioperative stroke occurred in 2.7% (n = 5, MI-SAVR) vs 2.2% (n = 4, TF-TAVR, P = 1). At 3 years, MI-SAVR was associated with significantly lower rates of paravalvular leakage (2.2% vs 13.8%, P < .001), new pacemaker implantations (6.6% vs 14.8%, P = .01) and a composite end-point of thromboembolic and major bleeding events (7.2% vs 12.7%, P = .025). No difference between aortic valve re-interventions and stroke was identified between groups. Survival at 1- and 3-year follow-up was 98% and 88% (MI-SAVR) and 88% and 67% (TF-TAVR) respectively (P < .001). EuroScore II emerged as an independent predictor of mortality (HR 1.12 [1.02, 1.23], P = .014).
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive SAVR with RD-valves could represent a treatment modality to TF-TAVR for severe AS in an older, low-risk patient cohort. In our retrospective cohort study, MI-SAVR was linked to improved survival and lower rates of permanent pacemaker implantation and paravalvular leakage.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansRetrospective StudiesFemaleTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementPropensity ScoreMaleAged, 80 and overHeart Valve ProsthesisAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeAgedRisk FactorsHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationProsthesis Design