MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2147/opth.s24219

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2012

Revisiting corneal topography for the diagnosis of keratoconus: use of Rabinowitz's KISA% index.

Sedghipour Mohammad Reza, Sadigh Afshin Lotfi, Motlagh Behzad Fallahi

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Numerous videokeratographic methods are used in the diagnosis of keratoconus. The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the KISA% index with the keratometry (K) value, inferior-superior (I-S) value, relative skewing of the steepest radial axes (SRAX), and keratometric astigmatism (AST) indices in 25 patients presenting with bilateral keratoconus.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients presenting with bilateral keratoconus were enrolled. Fifty eyes from 25 healthy individuals without corneal abnormalities were used as controls. The clinical diagnosis of keratoconus was made by observation of scissors reflex at retinoscopy and characteristic slit lamp findings. Corneal topographic analysis was performed in each eye to calculate the K value, I-S value, AST, and SRAX indices.

RESULTS

The keratoconus percentage index (KISA%) was significantly more sensitive and specific than the other indices examined. Furthermore, it was significantly better at predicting positive and negative results than the other indices included in the study.

CONCLUSION

The current research suggests that KISA% could be used to detect/diagnose keratoconus but further studies are required to confirm the specificity and sensitivity of KISA% for the detection of early-stage disease and keratoconus suspects.

Для цитирования: Sedghipour Mohammad Reza, Sadigh Afshin Lotfi, Motlagh Behzad Fallahi. Revisiting corneal topography for the diagnosis of keratoconus: use of Rabinowitz's KISA% index.. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.). 2012. DOI: 10.2147/opth.s24219.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.