Neurology · 2010
Postpuncture CSF leakage: a potential pitfall of radionuclide cisternography.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sakurai K, Nishio M, Sasaki S, Ogino H, Tohyama J, Yamada K, Shibamoto Y
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate radioisotope cisternography (RICG)-related postpuncture CSF leakage by MRI.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective 3-day imaging study. Ten patients with orthostatic headache and other symptoms underwent pre-RICG brain and spinal MRI, magnetic resonance myelography (MRM), RICG, and post-RICG spinal MRI and MRM. For RICG, we used a 25-gauge pencil point spinal needle at the L3/4 or L4/5 level after which subjects took bed rest for 2.5 hours.
RESULTS: On pre-RICG MRI and MRM, none of the 10 patients showed CSF leakage. However, 5 subjects (50%) showed epidural abnormalities suggesting CSF leakage on MRI after lumbar puncture for RICG. On RICG and subsequent MRM, 4 of the subjects showed definite findings of CSF leakage and 1 showed minimal leakage.
CONCLUSIONS: RICG carries a risk of iatrogenic CSF leakage even with careful puncturing using a fine needle. This leakage produces abnormal RICG and MRM findings at the lumbosacral level. Therefore, abnormal RICG findings restricted to the lumbosacral level should be carefully interpreted when diagnosing SIH.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective 3-day imaging study. Ten patients with orthostatic headache and other symptoms underwent pre-RICG brain and spinal MRI, magnetic resonance myelography (MRM), RICG, and post-RICG spinal MRI and MRM. For RICG, we used a 25-gauge pencil point spinal needle at the L3/4 or L4/5 level after which subjects took bed rest for 2.5 hours.
RESULTS: On pre-RICG MRI and MRM, none of the 10 patients showed CSF leakage. However, 5 subjects (50%) showed epidural abnormalities suggesting CSF leakage on MRI after lumbar puncture for RICG. On RICG and subsequent MRM, 4 of the subjects showed definite findings of CSF leakage and 1 showed minimal leakage.
CONCLUSIONS: RICG carries a risk of iatrogenic CSF leakage even with careful puncturing using a fine needle. This leakage produces abnormal RICG and MRM findings at the lumbosacral level. Therefore, abnormal RICG findings restricted to the lumbosacral level should be carefully interpreted when diagnosing SIH.