Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2009
Operative treatment of large periocular xanthelasma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Elabjer Biljana Kuzmanović, Busić Mladen, Sekelj Sandra, Krstonijević Edita Kondza
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To present our experience in operative treatment of large periocular xanthelasma.
METHODS: Sixty-three patients with large periocular xanthelasma were operatively treated in our department. Ipsilateral and/or contralateral lid skin grafts harvested by blepharoplasty, alone or in combination with local flaps, were used. Forty patients (64%) had enough skin to graft the defect after primary xanthelasma removal. In 10 patients, additional local flaps were used: modified rhomboid flap in six patients, local advancement flap in two, and bi-lobed flap in two patients. In three patients (5%), a sequential approach was applied since xanthelasma were too large to be completely removed in a single-step excision. No serious complications were shown.
RESULTS: Patients were followed from 6 months to 8 years. Five patients (8%) returned with recurrences 3-8 years after primary excision.
CONCLUSIONS: In lack of the setting for xanthelasma laser treatment, operative approach of a single-step or sequential excision using lid skin graft combined with local flaps proved its value for large periocular xanthelasma.
METHODS: Sixty-three patients with large periocular xanthelasma were operatively treated in our department. Ipsilateral and/or contralateral lid skin grafts harvested by blepharoplasty, alone or in combination with local flaps, were used. Forty patients (64%) had enough skin to graft the defect after primary xanthelasma removal. In 10 patients, additional local flaps were used: modified rhomboid flap in six patients, local advancement flap in two, and bi-lobed flap in two patients. In three patients (5%), a sequential approach was applied since xanthelasma were too large to be completely removed in a single-step excision. No serious complications were shown.
RESULTS: Patients were followed from 6 months to 8 years. Five patients (8%) returned with recurrences 3-8 years after primary excision.
CONCLUSIONS: In lack of the setting for xanthelasma laser treatment, operative approach of a single-step or sequential excision using lid skin graft combined with local flaps proved its value for large periocular xanthelasma.