Current eye research · 2024
A Comparison of Culture Results and Visual Acuity in Contact Lens Related Microbial Keratitis.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hart Jenna N, Lu Ming-Chen, Tracey Breanna M, Miller Keith D, Lephart Paul R, Mian Shahzad I, Woodward Maria A
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Evaluate the effect of corneal and contact lens-related (CLR) culture results on visual acuity (VA) in patients with microbial keratitis (MK).
METHODS: MK patients with corneal and CLR cultures were identified in the University of Michigan electronic health record from August 2012 to April 2022. Test results were classified as laboratory-positive or laboratory-negative. Linear regression was used to examine trends of VA and associations between changes in VA (differences of VA at 90-day and baseline VA) and corneal and CLR culture results, after adjustment for baseline VA. One-sample t-tests were used to test if the slope estimates were different from zero.
RESULTS: MK patients (n = 50) were on average 49 years old (standard deviation = 20.9), 56% female, and 90% White. Positive corneal and CLR cultures were reported in 60% and 64% of patients, respectively, and 38% reported both. The agreement rate between corneal and CLR culture results was 30% (n = 15/50). LogMAR VA improved over time in patients with positive corneal and CLR cultures (Estimate=-0.19 per 10-day increase, p = 0.002), and in those with negative corneal and positive CLR cultures (Estimate= -0.17 per 10-day increase, p = 0.004). Compared to patients with negative corneal and CLR cultures, there was a trend toward improvement in VA for patients with positive corneal and CLR cultures (Estimate=-0.68, p = 0.068), and those with negative corneal and positive CLR cultures (Estimate= -0.74, p = 0.059), after adjusting for baseline VA.
CONCLUSIONS: Positive CLR cultures are associated with significant improvement in VA over time. These additional cultures can provide guidance on appropriate antimicrobial selection, especially when corneal cultures are negative.
METHODS: MK patients with corneal and CLR cultures were identified in the University of Michigan electronic health record from August 2012 to April 2022. Test results were classified as laboratory-positive or laboratory-negative. Linear regression was used to examine trends of VA and associations between changes in VA (differences of VA at 90-day and baseline VA) and corneal and CLR culture results, after adjustment for baseline VA. One-sample t-tests were used to test if the slope estimates were different from zero.
RESULTS: MK patients (n = 50) were on average 49 years old (standard deviation = 20.9), 56% female, and 90% White. Positive corneal and CLR cultures were reported in 60% and 64% of patients, respectively, and 38% reported both. The agreement rate between corneal and CLR culture results was 30% (n = 15/50). LogMAR VA improved over time in patients with positive corneal and CLR cultures (Estimate=-0.19 per 10-day increase, p = 0.002), and in those with negative corneal and positive CLR cultures (Estimate= -0.17 per 10-day increase, p = 0.004). Compared to patients with negative corneal and CLR cultures, there was a trend toward improvement in VA for patients with positive corneal and CLR cultures (Estimate=-0.68, p = 0.068), and those with negative corneal and positive CLR cultures (Estimate= -0.74, p = 0.059), after adjusting for baseline VA.
CONCLUSIONS: Positive CLR cultures are associated with significant improvement in VA over time. These additional cultures can provide guidance on appropriate antimicrobial selection, especially when corneal cultures are negative.