MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Thrombosis and haemostasis · 1995

The utility of non-invasive tests for detection of previous proximal-vein thrombosis.

Villalta S, Prandoni P, Cogo A, Bagatella P, Piccioli A, Bernardi E, Simioni P, Scarano L, Girolami A

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of several diagnostic methods for the detection of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), the identification of previous episodes of DVT remains a diagnostic challenge.

STUDY

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reliability of a combination of a standardized clinical score with three non-invasive tests: compression ultrasonography (CUS), Doppler ultrasound (DUS), and photoplethysmography (PPG), in determining the presence or the absence of previous proximal DVT.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive unselected outpatients were identified, who had undergone contrast venography six to nine years previously because of the clinical suspicion of DVT (confirmed in 43). They were blindly reinvestigated by a panel of trained operators unaware of venography results. They underwent a clinical evaluation of the lower limb, by applying a standardized score to five symptoms and six signs (grading each item from 0 to 3); a PPG test to determine the venous refilling time; a DUS test to determine the venous reflux separately in the common femoral and the popliteal vein; and a CUS test to determine vein compressibility in the same regions.

RESULTS

An abnormal CUS test and/or the demonstration of venous reflux in the popliteal region and/or a high clinical score (> or = 8) identified twenty-four of the 43 (56%) DVT + patients with a specificity of 89%. The combination of normal CUS with the absence of venous reflux in both the common femoral and popliteal vein and a low clinical score excluded previous thrombosis in 45 (79%) of the 57 DVT-patients (negative predictive value, 78%). Abnormal venous reflux in the isolated common femoral vein did not reliably predict the presence or absence of previous DVT. However, this occurred in only 13 (13%) patients. The PPG determination of venous refilling time did not improve the results obtained with the other tests.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of a standardized clinical evaluation with the results of CUS and DUS can reliably diagnose or exclude previous proximal-vein thrombosis in almost 90% of patients with previous episodes of suspected DVT.

Для цитирования: Villalta S, Prandoni P, Cogo A, Bagatella P, Piccioli A, Bernardi E, Simioni P, Scarano L, Girolami A. The utility of non-invasive tests for detection of previous proximal-vein thrombosis.. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 1995.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.