Journal of thermal biology · 2026
Responsiveness of the CALERA Research Sensor to heat-acclimation-induced reductions in rectal temperature.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van den Bogaard Timo, Verheijen Pooh, Klous Lisa, van Erp Jan, Daanen Hein
Аннотация
Military personnel and athletes increasingly use non-invasive methods to estimate body core temperature during heat acclimation. This study determined the responsiveness of the CALERA Research Sensor (CRS) to changes in resting and end-exercise body core temperature induced by heat acclimation as well as the criterion validity for determining the thermal dose, defined as time spent with a body core temperature ≥38.5 °C. Fifteen participants completed a nine-day controlled-hyperthermia heat acclimation protocol. Body core temperature was continuously monitored prior to and during heat exposures using both the CRS (Tcrs) and a rectal temperature (Tre) probe. This study assessed responsiveness and criterion validity using Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Additionally, the analyses included a linear mixed model to further analyze responsiveness. Tcrs showed limited responsiveness to heat acclimation-induced changes in resting and end-exercise Tre with wide limits of agreement (±0.32 °C), proportional bias (indicating increasing underestimation with larger adaptations), and low ICC (≤0.18). Additionally, resting and end-exercise Tre decreased to a greater extent than Tcrs, which showed a downward trend during end-exercise over the nine-day heat acclimation (P < 0.001). The CRS showed limited criterion validity for estimating thermal dose, with wide limits of agreement (±20 min), proportional bias (indicating increasing underestimation at higher thermal doses), and low ICC of 0.35. These results indicate that the current version of the CRS underestimates both heat acclimation-induced changes in Tre and the thermal dose during controlled hyperthermia.