Introduction
The loss of muscle and fat mass caused by cancer is a significant determinant of the quality of life of cancer patients, and for many patients, contributes to premature death [ 1 ]. This loss of functional muscle and fat mass, known as cachexia, is caused by systemic inflammation, an increased metabolic rate, malnutrition and secretion of cytokines from tumors [ 2 ]. Cachexia significantly burdens cancer patients, with one study reporting that as cachexia progresses, cancer patients have reduced feelings of well-being and increased distress [ 3 ]. These symptoms are likely driven by a loss of strength and increased fatigue, which can limit mobility and the ability to perform independent tasks. Patients with metastatic cancer have a higher prevalence of cachexia than those with earlier-stage disease [ 4 , 5 ]. Breast cancer has traditionally been understudied in the context of cachexia, as the prevalence of cachexia is not as high as in some other cancers [ 2 ]. However, many breast cancer patients will develop cachexia over the course of disease progression, underscoring the need to understand its underlying mechanisms in this context.
As well as impacting the quality of life of cancer patients, cachexia reduces survival prospects. A meta-analysis of six studies with 5497 subjects found that sarcopenia in breast cancer patients was associated with higher mortality risk compared to those without cachexia [ 6 ]. This observation is not unique to breast cancer, with data collated in other meta-analyses suggesting that the presence of sarcropenia is negatively associated with survival in lung [ 7 ], gastric [ 8 ] and colorectal cancers [ 9 ]. The presence of cachexia in patients also predicts increased risk of complications following tumor resection surgery [ 10 ]. These observations suggest that clinicians should screen patients for cachexia to better personalize their cancer treatment. Furthermore, preclinical research should investigate mechanisms of cachexia to guide development of effective therapies and interventions.
This review will assess the prevalence of cachexia in patients with breast cancer relative to other cancer types. We will review the current literature describing the systemic cues contributing to muscle and fat loss in breast cancer, and the local muscle responses to these unique systemic cues that lead to cachexia. Recently, preclinical research has utilized multiple animal models to study this condition. We provide an appraisal of current models for studying breast cancer cachexia.
Prevalence and incidence of breast cancer cachexia
Some studies have reported that cachexia does not occur frequently in breast cancer [ 11 , 12 ]. To clarify this, we estimated the clinical prevalence of cachexia associated with breast cancer compared to the frequency of cachexia across other cancer types. A search of the literature in PubMed was conducted using the following search terms: ((cachexia[tiab] OR "wasting syndrome"[tiab]) AND (cancer[tiab] OR carcinoma*[tiab] OR neoplasm*[tiab] OR malignan*[tiab]) AND (incidence[tiab] OR prevalence[tiab] OR epidemiolog*[tiab])) AND ("2010/01/01"[Date—Publication]: "2025/06/01"[Date—Publication]) AND (humans[Mesh]) AND (english[lang]) NOT ("animals"[Mesh] NOT "humans"[Mesh]) NOT ("molecular"[tiab] OR "mechanism"[tiab] OR "pathway"[tiab] OR "biochemical"[tiab]) NOT ("case report"[Publication Type]). This search strategy led to 294 results, of which 219 were excluded for not being relevant, 12 were excluded for not distinguishing cancer types, 37 were excluded for using a definition of cachexia not consistent with the consensus definition as defined by Fearon and colleagues [ 13 ], resulting in 27 studies (across 26 papers) being included in the analysis [ 14 – 39 ] (Table 1 ; Supplemental File). The prevalence of cachexia differed among primary cancer sites (Fig. 1 a). Pancreatic (67.6%), upper digestive (60.0%), head and neck (50.4%), and colorectal (48.7%) were examples of cancers that were more frequently reported as associated with cachexia. By comparison, cachexia was indicated as occurring in approximately 19.6% of those with breast cancer (Fig. 1 a). The prevalence is likely to be higher in metastatic breast cancer, with one study finding that 36.1% of patients presenting with sarcopenia (as defined by skeletal muscle index < 39 cm 2 /m 2 ; where skeletal muscle index is muscle area at the L3 region of the spine in cm 2 ) at the time of diagnosis of metastasis, and 45.5% at initiation of third-line treatment [ 40 ]. These data indicate that the prevalence of cachexia in metastatic breast cancer is higher than in early-stage breast cancer, however there are limited clinical data stratifying these patient populations. Table 1 Tabular summary of incidence of cachexia by cancer type Author, Date PMID Country Upper digestive Head & Neck Lung Blood Gyneco-logical Colo-rectal Anal Breast Pressoir et al. 2010 [ 14 ] 20160725 FRA 63.2 56.6 49.4 42.9 45.1 47.5 - 24.2 Muscaritoli et al. 2017 [ 16 ] 29108370 ITA 85.2 47.1 47.2 - - 64.2 - 27.5 Li et al. 2018 [ 17 ] 30485919 CHN 59.3 67 32.1 36 34.2 45.1 - 19 Gilmore et al. 2025 [ 18 ] 40323088 USA - - 58 - - - - - Takaoka et al. 2024—systemic review [ 19 ] 39127425 Various 25.6 41.8 32 37 37.8 - - - Takaoka et al. 2024—meta analysis [ 19 ] 39.4 49.8 34 46.5 - - - - Rich et al. 2021. [ 20 ] 34555519 USA - - - - - - - - Zhang et al. 2025 [ 21 ] 40241395 Various 50 - - - - - - - March et al. 2022 [ 22 ] 35623801 Various - - - - - - - - Anker et al. 2019 [ 23 ] 30920776 Various 33.3 42.3 37.2 28.4 32.2 31.8 - 23.5 Poisson et al. 2021 [ 24 ] 34519440 FRA 76.3 53.8 63.8 50.9 41.2 62.4 - 29.3 Shukuya et al. 2023 [ 25 ] 36905129 JPN - - 20.4 - - - - - Vagnildhaug et al. 2018 [ 26 ] 29,274,028 NOR 42 - 36 19 - - - 11 Kwon et al. 2017 [ 27 ] 28,000,343 KOR - 53.2 - - - - - - Zhang et al. 2024 [ 28 ] 38,788,267 Various - - 39 - - - - - Namikawa et al. 2022 [ 29 ] 35322296 JPN 55 - - - - - - - Mitsunaga et al. 2020 [ 30 ] 32103356 JPN - - - - - - - - Dijksterhuis et al. 2021 [ 31 ] 33418527 NED 48 - - - - - - - Latenshein et al. 2020 [ 32 ] 33107709 NED - - - - - - - - Olaechea et al. 2023 [ 33 ] 37099735 USA 56.3 - - - - 27.2 - - Gannavarapu et al. 2018 [ 34 ] 29466074 USA 56.5 31.2 - - 27.2 26.1 - Shibata et al. 2020 [ 35 ] 33067699 JPN - - - - - 91.3 - - Nemer et al. 2017 [ 36 ] 28902785 USA - - - - - - - - Sun et al. 2015 [ 37 ] 26317149 CHN 76.5 42.4 25.8 - 34.9 42 - 2.9 Fukahori et al. 2021 [ 38 ] 32361831 JPN 88 - - - - - - - Katsushima et al. 2025 [ 39 ] 39825794 JPN - - 50.1 - - - - - Author, Date PMID Pancreatic Prostate Urinary Unknown primary Liver & Bile Duct Melanoma Thyroid Sarcoma Lymphoma Pressoir et al. 2010 [ 14 ] 20160725 - - - - - - - - - Muscaritoli et al. 2017 [ 16 ] 29108370 76.2 - 41.5 42.9 65.5 - - - - Li et al. 2018 [ 17 ] 30485919 63 28.6 33.3 - 31.6 - - - - Gilmore et al. 2025 [ 18 ] 40323088 - - - - - - - - - Takaoka et al. 2024—systemic review [ 19 ] 39127425 - - - - 20 - - - - Takaoka et al. 2024—meta analysis [ 19 ] - - - - 11.3 - - - - Rich et al. 2021. [ 20 ] 34555519 - - - - 57 - - - - Zhang et al. 2025 [ 21 ] 40241395 - - - - - - - - - March et al. 2022 [ 22 ] 35623801 - - - - 38.5 - - - - Anker et al. 2019 [ 23 ] 30920776 45.6 15.3 25.2 - 50.1 22.1 39.9 - - Poisson et al. 2021 [ 24 ] 34519440 - 50.6 44 - - 38.6 - - - Shukuya et al. 2023 [ 25 ] 36905129 - - - - - - - - - Vagnildhaug et al. 2018 [ 26 ] 29,274,028 - 13 - - - - - - - Kwon et al. 2017 [ 27 ] 28,000,343 - - - - - - - - - Zhang et al. 2024 [ 28 ] 38,788,267 - - - - - - - - - Namikawa et al. 2022 [ 29 ] 35322296 - - - - - - - - - Mitsunaga et al. 2020 [ 30 ] 32103356 71 - - - - - - - - Dijksterhuis et al. 2021 [ 31 ] 33418527 - - - - - - - - - Latenshein et al. 2020 [ 32 ] 33107709 71 - - - - - - - - Olaechea et al. 2023 [ 33 ] 37099735 - - - - - - - - - Gannavarapu et al. 2018 [ 34 ] 29466074 53.2 - - - - - - - - Shibata et al. 2020 [ 35 ] 33067699 - - - - - - - - - Nemer et al. 2017 [ 36 ] 28902785 71.5 - - - - - - - - Sun et al. 2015 [ 37 ] 26317149 88.9 - - - 50 - - 42.9 0 Fukahori et al. 2021 [ 38 ] 32361831 - - - - - - - - - Katsushima et al. 2025 [ 39 ] 39825794 - - - - - - - - - Numbers indicate prevalence of cachexia expressed as a percentage. Only studies that defined cachexia according to the Fearon definition were included [ 13 ].- = not reported in study Fig. 1 Estimated prevalence of cachexia by cancer type. ( A ) The percent prevalence of cachexia by cancer type (mean±SD), collated from [ 14 – 27 ], each data point represents a different study. ( B ) The new cases of cancer in 2022 (worldwide), with data from [ 42 ]. ( C ) Estimation of cachexia frequency by multiplying the prevalence of cachexia by the new cases of cancer each year, and ( D ) estimation of cachexia frequency in females. Numbers in bar graph represent rating of most frequent (1) to least frequent (14). N.R. = not reported; N.A. = not applicable
Table 1
Tabular summary of incidence of cachexia by cancer type
Numbers indicate prevalence of cachexia expressed as a percentage. Only studies that defined cachexia according to the Fearon definition were included [ 13 ].- = not reported in study
| Author, Date | PMID | Country | Upper digestive | Head & Neck | Lung | Blood | Gyneco-logical | Colo-rectal | Anal | Breast |
| Pressoir et al. 2010 [ 14 ] | 20160725 | FRA | 63.2 | 56.6 | 49.4 | 42.9 | 45.1 | 47.5 | - | 24.2 |
| Muscaritoli et al. 2017 [ 16 ] | 29108370 | ITA | 85.2 | 47.1 | 47.2 | - | - | 64.2 | - | 27.5 |
| Li et al. 2018 [ 17 ] | 30485919 | CHN | 59.3 | 67 | 32.1 | 36 | 34.2 | 45.1 | - | 19 |
| Gilmore et al. 2025 [ 18 ] | 40323088 | USA | - | - | 58 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Takaoka et al. 2024—systemic review [ 19 ] | 39127425 | Various | 25.6 | 41.8 | 32 | 37 | 37.8 | - | - | - |
| Takaoka et al. 2024—meta analysis [ 19 ] | 39.4 | 49.8 | 34 | 46.5 | - | - | - | - | ||
| Rich et al. 2021. [ 20 ] | 34555519 | USA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Zhang et al. 2025 [ 21 ] | 40241395 | Various | 50 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| March et al. 2022 [ 22 ] | 35623801 | Various | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Anker et al. 2019 [ 23 ] | 30920776 | Various | 33.3 | 42.3 | 37.2 | 28.4 | 32.2 | 31.8 | - | 23.5 |
| Poisson et al. 2021 [ 24 ] | 34519440 | FRA | 76.3 | 53.8 | 63.8 | 50.9 | 41.2 | 62.4 | - | 29.3 |
| Shukuya et al. 2023 [ 25 ] | 36905129 | JPN | - | - | 20.4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Vagnildhaug et al. 2018 [ 26 ] | 29,274,028 | NOR | 42 | - | 36 | 19 | - | - | - | 11 |
| Kwon et al. 2017 [ 27 ] | 28,000,343 | KOR | - | 53.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Zhang et al. 2024 [ 28 ] | 38,788,267 | Various | - | - | 39 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Namikawa et al. 2022 [ 29 ] | 35322296 | JPN | 55 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mitsunaga et al. 2020 [ 30 ] | 32103356 | JPN | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Dijksterhuis et al. 2021 [ 31 ] | 33418527 | NED | 48 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Latenshein et al. 2020 [ 32 ] | 33107709 | NED | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Olaechea et al. 2023 [ 33 ] | 37099735 | USA | 56.3 | - | - | - | - | 27.2 | - | - |
| Gannavarapu et al. 2018 [ 34 ] | 29466074 | USA | 56.5 | 31.2 | - | - | 27.2 | 26.1 | - | |
| Shibata et al. 2020 [ 35 ] | 33067699 | JPN | - | - | - | - | - | 91.3 | - | - |
| Nemer et al. 2017 [ 36 ] | 28902785 | USA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Sun et al. 2015 [ 37 ] | 26317149 | CHN | 76.5 | 42.4 | 25.8 | - | 34.9 | 42 | - | 2.9 |
| Fukahori et al. 2021 [ 38 ] | 32361831 | JPN | 88 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Katsushima et al. 2025 [ 39 ] | 39825794 | JPN | - | - | 50.1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Author, Date | PMID | Pancreatic | Prostate | Urinary | Unknown primary | Liver & Bile Duct | Melanoma | Thyroid | Sarcoma | Lymphoma |
| Pressoir et al. 2010 [ 14 ] | 20160725 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Muscaritoli et al. 2017 [ 16 ] | 29108370 | 76.2 | - | 41.5 | 42.9 | 65.5 | - | - | - | - |
| Li et al. 2018 [ 17 ] | 30485919 | 63 | 28.6 | 33.3 | - | 31.6 | - | - | - | - |
| Gilmore et al. 2025 [ 18 ] | 40323088 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Takaoka et al. 2024—systemic review [ 19 ] | 39127425 | - | - | - | - | 20 | - | - | - | - |
| Takaoka et al. 2024—meta analysis [ 19 ] | - | - | - | - | 11.3 | - | - | - | - | |
| Rich et al. 2021. [ 20 ] | 34555519 | - | - | - | - | 57 | - | - | - | - |
| Zhang et al. 2025 [ 21 ] | 40241395 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| March et al. 2022 [ 22 ] | 35623801 | - | - | - | - | 38.5 | - | - | - | - |
| Anker et al. 2019 [ 23 ] | 30920776 | 45.6 | 15.3 | 25.2 | - | 50.1 | 22.1 | 39.9 | - | - |
| Poisson et al. 2021 [ 24 ] | 34519440 | - | 50.6 | 44 | - | - | 38.6 | - | - | - |
| Shukuya et al. 2023 [ 25 ] | 36905129 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Vagnildhaug et al. 2018 [ 26 ] | 29,274,028 | - | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Kwon et al. 2017 [ 27 ] | 28,000,343 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Zhang et al. 2024 [ 28 ] | 38,788,267 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Namikawa et al. 2022 [ 29 ] | 35322296 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mitsunaga et al. 2020 [ 30 ] | 32103356 | 71 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Dijksterhuis et al. 2021 [ 31 ] | 33418527 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Latenshein et al. 2020 [ 32 ] | 33107709 | 71 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Olaechea et al. 2023 [ 33 ] | 37099735 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Gannavarapu et al. 2018 [ 34 ] | 29466074 | 53.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Shibata et al. 2020 [ 35 ] | 33067699 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Nemer et al. 2017 [ 36 ] | 28902785 | 71.5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Sun et al. 2015 [ 37 ] | 26317149 | 88.9 | - | - | - | 50 | - | - | 42.9 | 0 |
| Fukahori et al. 2021 [ 38 ] | 32361831 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Katsushima et al. 2025 [ 39 ] | 39825794 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
![Fig. 1 Estimated prevalence of cachexia by cancer type. ( A ) The percent prevalence of cachexia by cancer type (mean±SD), collated from [ 14 – 27 ], each data point represents a …](/library/1101119/assets/603931ab8cc419b0e0bade71ab39b8ad44571cd81c63e21bb602ed2078e0caf8.jpg/)
It is important to note that the papers used in this analysis included data primarily from Western and Asian countries, with Japan (6 studies) USA (5 studies), France (3 studies), China, Netherlands (both 2 studies), Italy, Norway and Korea (all 1 study, with 6 studies using data from multiple populations) used to gather prevalence of cachexia. It is unclear whether cachexia prevalence in these breast cancer populations may be low due to early detection from screening (Fig. 1 a). For instance, in Australia 5% of breast cancer patients are diagnosed at stage IV, compared to 18% for colon and 42% for lung cancers [ 41 ]. In countries with limited access to early screening of breast cancer, the prevalence of cachexia may be higher. It is important to note that lifestyle, heritage, breast cancer subtype or breast cancer stage were not considered in these analyses, thereby impacting cachexia prevalence and severity.
We collated the number of new cases by cancer type from data collated by the World Cancer Research Fund (Fig. 1 b [ 42 ]). We next estimated the incidence of cachexia at the population level by multiplying the total number of cancer diagnoses per year (Fig. 1 b) [ 42 ] (as an approximation of total cancer incidence) by the prevalence of cachexia in each cancer type (Fig. 1 a). Lung, colorectal, upper digestive, gynecological, hematological, head and neck, followed by breast cancer, exhibited the highest incidence when factoring in total cancer diagnoses (Fig. 1 c). These data indicate that although the prevalence of cachexia in breast cancer may not be as high as other cancers, the total number of breast cancer patients with cachexia is considerable.
Given breast cancer largely affects females, we then multiplied the incidence of cachexia (Fig. 1 a), by the number of cancer diagnoses in females only (Fig. 1 d). In females, the most frequent cases of cachexia were associated with gynecological and breast cancers (Fig. 1 d). However, this estimate of cachexia takes into account the frequency of cachexia across both sexes, corrected for cancer diagnoses only in females. Very few papers stratify cachexia incidence by sex and cancer type, so it is difficult to accurately determine cachexia incidence only in females. There are differences in prevalence and pathogenesis of cachexia between the sexes [ 43 , 44 ]; therefore, it is conceivable that the prevalence of cachexia in different primary cancers varies by sex. Nonetheless, in females, gynecological and breast cancers contribute a relatively large proportion of cachexia cases. Assessment of cachexia prevalence, accounting for the incidence of individual cancer types highlights the need to study cachexia in breast cancer.
We also searched for studies that reported the prevalence of cachexia in metastatic vs. non-metastatic breast cancer patients (as presented in Table 2 ). Due to the lack of papers reporting the prevalence between these patient populations, we extended our search beyond the limitation of 2010–2026, and also included papers citing sarcopenia or cachexia. Dewys and colleagues reported weight loss in 49% of metastatic breast cancer patients compared to 31% in non-metastatic patients [ 45 ]. It is important to note that this study was conducted more than 4 decades ago, with advancements in both treatment and diagnosis occurring since then; therefore, the prevalence reported in this study may not reflect current rates of cachexia. However, a similar difference was reported in another study that used > 5% weight loss or BMI < 20 with weight loss of 2% to 5% as the cutoff for cachexia with 27.5% and 10.8% rates of cachexia in metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer patients, respectively [ 16 ]. Other reported prevalence of sarcopenia in metastatic breast cancer patients are 36.1% and 41.6% [ 40 , 46 ] (Table 2 ). From the limited number of papers that report on cachexia prevalence in metastatic breast cancer, the prevalence appears to range between 30–50% (Table 2 ). Comparatively, in other cancer types, cachexia prevalence in metastatic cancer patients ranges from 40–85% depending on the cancer type [ 16 ]. Muscaritoli and colleagues reported the prevalence of cachexia to be particularly high in metastatic GI (85.2%) pancreatic (76.2%), liver (65.5%) and colorectal (64.2%) cancer patients [ 16 ]. Table 2 Summary of prevalence of cachexia in metastatic breast cancer Author, Date PMID Cachexia rate in early breast cancer Cachexia rate in metastatic breast cancer Cachexia definition Dewys et al., 1980 [ 45 ] 7424938 31 49 Weight loss over 2 months Muscaritoli et al., 2017 [ 16 ] 29108370 10.8 27.5 > 5% weight loss, or BMI < 20 with 2–5% weight loss over 6 months Camilleri et al., 2024 [ 40 ] 38908032 N.R 36.1 Weight loss of ≥ 5% within one month, or ≥ 10% within six months, or ≥ 10% of the usual body weight, or BMI < 18.5 kg/m 2 , or < 22 kg/m 2 in patients 70 yrs or older Jang et al., 2025 [ 46 ] 40446428 N.R 41.6 SMI cutoffs between 38–41 cm 2 /m 2 N.R. Not reported, SMI Skeletal muscle index, BMI Body mass index
Table 2
Summary of prevalence of cachexia in metastatic breast cancer
N.R. Not reported, SMI Skeletal muscle index, BMI Body mass index
| Author, Date | PMID | Cachexia rate in early breast cancer | Cachexia rate in metastatic breast cancer | Cachexia definition |
| Dewys et al., 1980 [ 45 ] | 7424938 | 31 | 49 | Weight loss over 2 months |
| Muscaritoli et al., 2017 [ 16 ] | 29108370 | 10.8 | 27.5 | > 5% weight loss, or BMI < 20 with 2–5% weight loss over 6 months |
| Camilleri et al., 2024 [ 40 ] | 38908032 | N.R | 36.1 | Weight loss of ≥ 5% within one month, or ≥ 10% within six months, or ≥ 10% of the usual body weight, or BMI < 18.5 kg/m 2 , or < 22 kg/m 2 in patients 70 yrs or older |
| Jang et al., 2025 [ 46 ] | 40446428 | N.R | 41.6 | SMI cutoffs between 38–41 cm 2 /m 2 |
Clinical case studies reporting breast cancer cachexia
Cachexia has been reported in clinical case studies of breast cancer patients [ 11 , 12 ]. One such case study assessed subcutaneous fat, visceral fat, abdominal muscle, and paraspinal muscle mass through cancer progression by computed tomography (CT) scans, and found that cross sectional area (CSA) of these tissues decreased over time as the disease progressed [ 11 ]. Another case study of a breast cancer patient with bone metastases found that subcutaneous fat, abdominal muscle, and paraspinal muscle mass, but not visceral fat area correlated with metastatic tumor area [ 12 ]; highlighting that metastatic tumor progression may accelerate cachexia. Another case study highlighted frailty, weakness and a loss of appetite in a patient with breast cancer untreated for 3 years [ 47 ]. These case studies highlight that over the course of breast cancer progression, muscle wasting can significantly impact the quality of life of cancer patients.
Clinical evidence of cachexia in breast cancer has also been demonstrated in a study reporting smaller muscle fiber CSA in biopsies from individuals with breast cancer relative to cancer-free individuals [ 48 ]. This reduction in muscle size was associated with defects in mitochondria, measured by electron microscopy from muscle biopsies [ 48 ]. Functionally, forearm strength was also reduced in breast cancer survivors [ 49 ]. Additionally, transcriptomic profiling of skeletal muscle from early-stage breast cancer patients revealed impairments in oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial function, suggesting that muscle dysfunction may begin early in the disease course [ 50 ]. Furthermore, a longitudinal study of patients with non-metastatic breast cancer found that 84% of these individuals had either reduced muscle function or size over time [ 51 ]. A study of breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy reported that muscle CSA, muscle capillarization, and citrate synthase activity – a measure of muscle aerobic capacity – declined during 16 weeks of treatment [ 52 ]. Aerobic training in combination with high-intensity interval training restored the reduction in CSA in only type I fibers (oxidative) and resistance training with high-intensity interval training increased CSA in both type I and type II (fast twitch) fibers [ 52 ]. The authors also found that mitochondrial complex I, II and IV protein expression was elevated only following aerobic training and high-intensity interval training [ 52 ], consistent with the increase in CSA only in slow/oxidative muscle fibers. These case studies of cachexia in breast cancer patients further highlight the impact of cachexia on some breast cancer patients. Preclinical studies have complemented these observations, where patient-derived xenografts of different breast cancer subtypes in mice caused muscle dysfunction and fatigue [ 53 , 54 ].
Systemic drivers of cachexia in breast cancer
Secretion of cytokines and extracellular vesicles from the primary tumor
There is evidence that primary tumor-derived factors may contribute to cachexia in breast cancer (Fig. 2 ). Kumar and colleagues demonstrated that secreted cytokines from primary breast tumors can induce cachexia [ 55 ]. In this study, MCF-7 human breast cancer cells were modified to produce a secreted form of interleukin 1a (IL-1a), and when engrafted into nude mice, resulted in a progressive loss of body mass over the course of six weeks to a greater extent than parental tumors. Incubation of rat muscles with IL-1 increased muscle protein breakdown [ 56 ], while twice daily delivery of IL-1a to Wistar rats induced anorexia and cachexia [ 57 ]. Analysis of transcriptional datasets showed that breast cancers had increased expression of pro-cachectic factors, including IL-1β [ 58 ]. IL-1β is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that has been linked to cachexia promotion [ 59 ]. It is produced by myeloid cells, and stimulates IL-6 expression [ 60 ] that is involved in the inflammatory response in muscle to cachexia and has emerged as a potential therapeutic target to reduce cachectic progression [ 61 , 62 ]. Another study highlighted the role of systemic IL-1β in a study of Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC)-bearing mice, showing that it is elevated in the hypothalamus and is associated with muscle protein breakdown [ 63 ]. Analysis of the expression of known cancer cachexia inducing factors in RNA sequencing data from breast, colon, esophageal, head and neck, acute myeloid leukemia, liver, lung, pancreatic, prostate, rectal and stomach cancers revealed distinct expression profiles of these cytokines in different cancer types [ 64 ]. For example in breast cancer, CXCL9 , CXCL10 and INHBA (Activin A) were notably increased [ 64 ], indicating that secretion of these cytokines may contribute to cachexia in breast cancer. These cytokines have been well characterized to induce cachexia. For instance, delivery of viral vectors expressing Activin A, either systemically or directly to muscle promotes muscle wasting and weakness in mice [ 65 , 66 ]. Fig. 2 Mechanisms of tissue crosstalk and cachexia in breast cancer. In breast cancer, there is evidence to suggest that cues from the primary tumor, as well as distal metastases contribute to cachexia progression. Primary tumors (top left) secrete cytokines and EVs. Tumor cells are released from the primary tumor into the circulation. Tumor derived cytokines and CTCs disseminate to metastatic niches (top center) to form metastases. Metastatic lesions cause myelopoiesis in the bone marrow and spleen (top right) leading to increased circulating immune cells. Primary tumor and/or metastatic derived cytokines as well as immune cells (through increased chemoattraction) increase in abundance in skeletal muscle (center). These inflammatory cytokines impact neuromuscular health. These inflammatory cytokines lead to increased inflammatory signaling (center right), which results in alterations in proteostasis, impaired metal transporters, glucose transport, mitochondrial content, and ultimately muscle dysfunction. Chemotherapy, immune therapies and radiation therapies (bottom) disrupt muscle health through inflammation (center right), DNA damage (center right), mitochondrial dysfunction (center right) defects to the motor nerve (center), and reduced appetite (bottom). AchRγ = Acetylcholine receptor gamma; CCL2 = C–C motif chemokine ligand 2; CTC = circulating tumor cell; EV = extracellular vesicle; MDSC = myeloid-derived suppressor cell; IFN = interferon ; IL = interleukin; ROS = reactive oxygen species; RyR1 = ryanodine receptor 1; TGF-β = transforming growth factor-beta; TNF-α = tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Created in BioRender. Saunders, A. (2026) https://BioRender.com/43ks0r3

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted by primary tumors may be involved in breast cancer-induced cachexia (Fig. 2 ). Hu and colleagues isolated EVs from 4T1, MCF-10 and MDA-MB-231 conditioned medium (CM) and found that EVs derived from 4T1 and MDA-MB-231 cells reduced both inguinal and epi-gonadal white adipose tissue in mice [ 67 ]. No difference in fat deposition was seen with EVs from MCF-10 non-tumorigenic breast cancer cells [ 67 ]. The authors attributed the fat loss seen in the triple-negative 4T1 and MDA-MB-231 lines to cancer cell-secreted exosomal miR-204-5p that induced hypoxia-inducible factor 1 A (HIF1A) in white adipose tissue [ 67 ]. HIF1A altered the mitochondrial content and thermogenesis to increase lipolysis and fat loss. Whether EV secretion from breast cancer cells results in muscle loss is not as well established and is a potential avenue for future research.
Secretion of cytokines from visceral metastases
The progression of metastasis has been linked to cachexia severity and progression [ 68 ]. There are parallels between steps of the metastatic cascade, and the genes involved in the various steps of metastasis that are related to cachexia development [ 68 , 69 ]. For instance, inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and IL-1β promote invasion in breast cancer [ 70 ] (Fig. 2 ). TNF-α is well characterized inducer of cachexia in non-breast cancer models [ 71 ]. The source of TNF-α in cachexia is not fully understood; however, it is hypothesized to be secreted from tumor cells and macrophages [ 72 ]. Macrophage infiltration into muscle has been described in cachexia [ 73 ] and may be the source of TNF-α that drives cachexia. Other inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 are also key regulators of metastasis in breast cancer [ 74 ]. IL-6 signaling is well characterized to promote cachexia, acting both to both reduce fat mass [ 61 , 66 ], and directly on the muscle to drive atrophy [ 75 , 76 ].
These reports indicate that there may be specific cues secreted from metastatic tumors that cause or exacerbate cachexia [ 77 ]. The role of visceral metastasis independent from primary tumors has been demonstrated in preclinical studies where the primary tumor is resected and mice subsequently develop metastases and muscle and fat loss, indicative of cachexia [ 78 , 79 ]. In non-breast cancer models, experimental induction of liver metastasis following intrasplenic injection of colon cancer cells resulted in decreased muscle mass, as well as increased mRNA expression of Trim63 / Murf-1 , Fbox32 / Atrogin-1 , and Il-6 in the tibialis anterior muscle [ 80 ]. It is therefore evident that inflammatory cytokines secreted from visceral metastatic lesions likely contribute to cachectic progression in breast cancer as well; however, there are limited studies demonstrating the precise mechanisms and cytokines secreted by visceral metastases to drive cachexia.
Osteolytic secretion of cytokines from bone metastases
Rates of bone metastases are particularly high in breast cancer [ 81 ], and bone metastatic derived cytokines may contribute to cachexia progression (Fig. 2 ). Recently, bone-to-muscle crosstalk has been described as a regulator of skeletal muscle health [ 82 , 83 ]. Waning and colleagues completed intracardiac injections of 100,000 MDA-MB-231 human cancer cells into nude mice to induce bone metastasis, resulting in lowered lean mass and reduced muscle function [ 84 ]. Analysis of post-translational protein modifications by unbiased mass spectrometry of muscles from these mice, and from breast cancer patients with metastatic disease revealed that proteins involved in muscle contraction were highly oxidized [ 84 ]. Notable from these analyses were sarcomeric proteins such as tropomyosin, myosin and the ryanodine receptor 1 (RyR1) Ca2 + release channel. These results were largely replicated in other osteolytic models, including A549 (lung cancer), PC3 (prostate cancer), JJN3 (multiple myeloma) as well as mixed osteolytic/osteoblastic bone metastases (RWGT2 lung cancer and MCF-7 breast cancer) [ 84 ]. Pharmacological reduction of RyR1 leak through subcutaneous administration of S107 partially improved grip strength and increased specific force back to normal levels [ 84 ]. Administration of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) receptor I kinase inhibitor SD-208 (by daily oral gavage), a TGF-β neutralizing antibody, or reducing TGF-β release from the bone matrix through the bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid (by subcutaneous injection), also improved muscle function [ 82 , 83 ].
As the immune system is an important regulator of metastasis [ 85 ] and skeletal muscle health [ 86 ], the study by Waning and colleagues [ 84 ] was followed up by Regan and colleagues who completed intra-tibial injections of 4T1 murine breast cancer cells to simulate bone tumor colonization [ 87 ]. This experimental setup resulted in reduced fat and muscle mass after four weeks [ 87 ]. The authors attributed these changes to impaired RyR1 signaling, consistent with their previous work [ 84 ]. An advantage of the intratibial model, is that tumor formation was likely exclusively in the bone microenvironment, and therefore muscle impairments were driven solely by secretion from the bone environment. In addition to muscle wasting, breast cancer and bone metastases have been reported to induce lipolysis of fat tissue through mechanisms such as secretion of TGF-β, TNF-α, IL-6 and parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) from both primary and metastatic lesions as reviewed by Soni and colleagues [ 88 ].
Neuro-inflammation associated with perineural invasion and tumor innervation
Imoto and colleagues described that body mass and BMI were lower in pancreatic cancer patients whose tumors were highly innervated [ 89 ]. To experimentally induce perineural invasion, the same group injected pancreatic tumor cells into the sciatic nerve of mice, which resulted in astrocyte activation leading to neuroinflammation and muscle wasting [ 89 ]. This effect could be reversed by ligating the nerve [ 89 ]. Furthermore, in a murine lymphoma cachexia model, sympathectomy through delivery of 6-OHDA reduced muscle wasting, suggesting a role for the sympathetic nervous system in cachexia progression [ 90 ]. Perineural invasion and tumor innervation has been observed in multiple cancers, and the density of nerves correlates with more aggressive cancers of the prostate, colon and rectum, head and neck, breast, pancreas, stomach and lung [ 91 ]. As many of these highly innervated tumors are associated with significant cachexia (Fig. 1 ) it is conceivable that the ability of tumors to hijack the nervous system may presently be an under-appreciated contributor to cachexia, particularly when highly metastatic cancers disseminate and seed into extensively innervated tissues. Innervation has been described in primary breast cancer [ 92 ], although there is no research to-date exploring whether this phenomenon contributes to cachexia. To date, most research on neuronal regulation of cancer has focused on primary cancers, where there is emerging evidence that innervation can influence metastatic colonization [ 93 – 95 ]. In the context of breast cancer, it may be more likely that innervation becomes a factor in cachexia when metastatic secondary tumors develop in other organs known to have stronger association with cachexia. Potentially, the role of perineural invasion and tumor innervation in both primary and metastatic breast lesions in promoting cachexia is an area for future research.
Muscle-derived regulators of cachexia in breast cancer
Decreased muscle protein synthesis
Following the systemic cachexia inducing cues in breast cancer, there is a cascade of events that occur in muscle that result in muscle atrophy and weakness (Fig. 2 ). One such response is a reduction in protein synthesis following inflammatory signaling in muscle (Fig. 2 ). We have reported differences in muscle protein synthesis rates between models of breast cancer, with the more severely cachectic EMT6.5 tumor-bearing mice displaying a reduction in puromycin-labelled proteins relative to muscle from 4T1.2 tumor-bearing mice, indicating a reduction in synthesis of new proteins [ 79 ]. Impairments in protein synthesis have been reported in other cachectic models, for instance in mice bearing murine MAC16 colon adenocarcinoma, as measured by L-[4-3H]phenylalanine labelling of proteins in gastrocnemius muscles [ 96 ]. In colon-26 (C26) tumor-bearing mice, puromycin labelled proteins were also decreased, further highlighting impaired protein synthesis as a hallmark of muscle cachexia [ 97 , 98 ].
A key signaling pathway contributing to protein synthesis is the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)- AKT pathway that is impaired in cancer cachexia. mTOR activity is reduced in both the C26 and LLC tumor-bearing mouse models of cachexia, as shown by decreased expression of phosphorylated AKT and pS6-Kinase and a suppressed rate of protein synthesis [ 97 ]. Furthermore, cachexia may induce anabolic resistance, as evidenced by a decreased capacity of Apc Min/+ mice to activate mTOR signaling after administration of a glucose bolus [ 99 ]. In a comparative study using breast cancer models, phosphorylated AKT was reduced only in the more severely cachectic EMT6.5 model compared to 4T1.2 tumor bearing mice. However, phosphorylated mTOR and 4EBP-1 were reduced to a similar extent in both models [ 79 ]. In summary, the perturbation of the mTOR pathway in breast cancer cachexia is consistent with observations in other cancer types.
Increased muscle protein degradation
In addition to impairments in protein synthesis, protein degradation is typically elevated in settings of cancer cachexia [ 100 ] (Fig. 2 ). As there are few techniques that reliably measure protein breakdown and proteasome activity, mRNA and protein expression of E3 ligases are often used as surrogate measures of protein degradation [ 101 ]. Atrogin-1 and Murf-1 protein levels in C2C12 cells and in muscle from 4T1 tumor-bearing mice were elevated as measured by western blot and immunolabelling, respectively [ 102 ]. In an experimental model of intratibial 4T1 bone colonization, transcript levels of Fbox32 and Trim63 were elevated in muscle [ 87 ], demonstrating that muscle deficits occur following localized bone metastasis. Similarly, in an orthotopic 4T1 model Fbox30 , Fbox31 , Fbox32 , and Trim63 were all elevated in tibialis anterior and diaphragm muscles as measured through RT-qPCR [ 78 ]. This gene signature was consistent with another study of Bard1-deficient breast tumor-bearing mice [ 103 ] and EMT6.5 orthotopic tumor-bearing mice [ 79 ].
Another mechanism of muscle protein breakdown is autophagy. In EMT6.5 breast tumor-bearing mice, Gabarapl1 (which contributes to autophagosome maturation, and lysosome fusion) mRNA was elevated, with a trend for an increase in Map1 lc3b (which encodes lc3b which is involved in autophagosome formation) and Sqstm1 (which encodes p62) in this model [ 79 ]. Lc3b protein expression as measured by western blot was also elevated in C2C12 muscle cells treated with conditioned medium (CM) from 4T1 cells [ 102 ]. Increased protein expression of these aforementioned autophagy markers was also observed in immunocompromised mice administered MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells by intracardiac injection [ 104 ]. These changes have been observed in other cancers; for instance, in muscle from gastric cancer patients, Beclin mRNA and protein expression – which is associated in autophagy initiation – was elevated in cachectic vs weight stable patients [ 105 ]. Furthermore, mRNA and protein levels of LC3B, were elevated in both weight-losing and weight-stable cancer patients relative to healthy; with LC3B protein expression elevated more in weight-losing patients relative to weight-stable patients [ 105 ]. p62 is another marker of autophagy, and a similar trend was observed in both protein and mRNA in the same study [ 105 ]. These data indicate that autophagy-mediated muscle protein breakdown may contribute to cachexia in breast cancer.
Mitochondrial dysfunction and impaired glucose handling
Mitochondrial dysfunction in muscle has been reported as a consequence of breast cancer metastasis (Fig. 2 ). In mice inoculated with human MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, expression of proteins in muscle involved in mitochondrial biogenesis was decreased [ 104 ]. The same study also observed increased autophagy-related protein expression in mitochondrial fractions of muscle [ 104 ], indicating an increase in mitophagy. Further evidence of mitochondrial deficits in breast cancer cachectic muscle was demonstrated in a study that compared isolated skeletal muscle fibers from 13 breast cancer patients to those of healthy females, revealing decreased mitochondrial content in both intermyofibrillar and subsarcolemmal regions of muscles, measured by electron microscopy [ 48 ].
CM from breast cancer cells can also impair glucose uptake into skeletal muscle cells in vitro (Fig. 2 ). Treatment of rat myotubes with CM from either MCF-7 or BT474 cells disrupted the translocation of glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) to the plasma membrane, resulting in reduced glucose uptake into skeletal muscle cells relative to treatment with CM from the non-tumorigenic MCF-10A line [ 106 ]. Furthermore, insulin signaling though Rac1 was diminished in this experimental model [ 106 ]. These data indicate that impaired glucose uptake into skeletal muscle may be another mechanism causing muscle weakness in breast cancer metastasis.
Impaired ion transport into muscle cells
As previously discussed, Waning and colleagues demonstrated that muscle proteins of mice bearing MDA-MB-231 tumors were highly oxidized [ 84 ]. In particular the RyR1 Ca 2+ release channel was highly post-translationally modified [ 84 ]. Oxidation of RyR1 channels in skeletal muscle results in a pathological sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca 2+ leak, which is associated with muscle weakness [ 84 ] (Fig. 2 ). Waning and colleagues followed up these results in muscle from breast cancer patients with bone metastases and found similar alterations in the RyR1 channel [ 84 ]. Therefore, impairments in muscle function in cachexia may be a consequence impaired Ca 2+ handling.
Another mechanism of muscle dysfunction described in the literature is impaired transport of ions within muscle. Wang and colleagues identified changes in genes associated with Zinc ion binding in muscles of mice bearing 4T1 (breast) and C26m2 (colon) tumors through RNAseq analysis [ 78 ]. The authors focused on the metal transporter Zip14 , as it was highly expressed in both tibialis anterior and diaphragm muscles in tumor-bearing mice relative to the respective controls [ 78 ]. Further analysis revealed that Zip14 induction was induced by TNF-α and TGF-β, as neutralization of these cytokines with antibodies prevented enhanced Zip14 expression [ 78 ] (Fig. 2 ). Knockout of Zip14 also reversed evidence of cachexia in mice, as measured by an increase in body weight, muscle CSA, and a reversal of the increase in E3 ligase gene expression in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice [ 78 ]. This increase in the metal transporter resulted in increased zinc, iron, manganese and copper in the gastrocnemius muscle and zinc and iron in the diaphragm [ 103 ]. Elevated levels of iron may cause muscle dysfunction through mechanisms such as ferroptosis of muscle cells [ 107 ].
Immune cell infiltration into muscle
The infiltration of CD45 + immune cells into muscle has been observed in multiple models of cachexia, including colon, lung and pancreatic cancer [ 108 ], and more recently breast cancer [ 79 ]. Neyroud and colleagues demonstrated that the presence of CD45 + immune cells increased in the diaphragm of KPC pancreatic tumor-bearing mice as the disease advanced [ 108 ]. A similar phenomenon of increased CD45 + cells in tibialis anterior muscles of both 4T1.2 and EMT6.5 breast tumor-bearing mice was also observed in our study [ 79 ] (Fig. 2 ). An increase in neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, but a decrease in B cells and CD4 T cells was found in C26 tumor-bearing mice relatively to sham and weight stable mice [ 109 ]. In support, increased CD11b + myeloid cells were found in cachectic, pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC) patients relative to weight stable and healthy individuals [ 110 ]. Similarly, in transgenic KPP pancreatic tumor-bearing mice and LLC lung tumor-bearing mice, macrophages, neutrophils and eosinophils in LLC but not KPP were elevated in hindlimb muscles, as measured by flow cytometry [ 111 ].
In breast cancer models, monocytes are elevated in the circulation [ 112 , 113 ]. In 4T1 tumor-bearing mice, chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) was shown to promote cachexia [ 102 ], possibly through chemoattraction of immune cells (Fig. 2 ). In mice administered 4T1 cells through intravenous injection, circulating IL36G expressing neutrophil-like cells were reported to promote cachexia [ 112 ]. Furthermore, we have demonstrated increased Ly6G + cells within muscles of cachectic EMT6.5 breast tumor-bearing mice [ 79 ]. These data indicate that myeloid-derived immune cells may be promoting cachexia in breast cancer. Neutrophil levels have also been reported to be elevated in blood, lung and liver of cachectic C26 and KPC tumor-bearing mice [ 112 – 114 ]. This observation is consistent with data collected from patients with metastatic colon, prostate and lung cancers, where an elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio has been found in blood samples [ 114 ]. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio relative to hand-grip strength can be used to predict cancer outcomes [ 115 ]. Targeting neutrophils may be a viable therapeutic strategy to negate cachexia, as depletion of Ly6G + cells reduced muscle wasting in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer [ 116 ]. Targeting other myeloid cells, such as macrophages has also been demonstrated to reduce cachexia [ 73 , 110 , 115 , 117 ]; however, the role of macrophages in breast cancer-induced cachexia is not well established.
Alterations in the neuromuscular junction architecture
Changes in the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) have been described as a driver of cachexia, with perturbations in the structure of the motor unit observed in both patient samples and in C26 colon tumor-bearing mice [ 118 ]. Single nuclear RNA sequencing of muscles from mice with pancreatic cancer revealed that genes associated with NMJ remodeling were elevated [ 119 ]. In both 4T1.2 and EMT6.5 breast tumor-bearing mice, the area of the motor endplate was reduced compared to sham mice [ 79 ] (Fig. 2 ). These morphological changes were associated with altered expression of structures and genes, consistent with other studies that report deficits in the NMJ in cachexia [ 120 ]. However, in contrast to previous reports in other cancers [ 118 ], there was no deficit observed in the structure of the motor nerve itself in 4T1.2 and EMT6.5 tumor-bearing mice [ 79 ].
Therapy-induced cachexia in breast cancer
Anti-cancer therapies can also contribute to the onset and progression of cachexia [ 121 ] (Fig. 2 ), with chemotherapy well-documented to cause muscle and fat loss [ 122 ]. A direct effect of chemotherapy on muscle cells was demonstrated by treating differentiated C2C12 myotubes with doxorubicin for 48 h, which resulted in an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) and smaller myotubes in vitro [ 123 ]. In mice, doxorubicin was shown to accumulate in the mitochondria, an event that could be reversed by treadmill running [ 124 ]. A transcriptional analysis of muscle from C57/BL6 mice treated with doxorubicin revealed an increase in p53/p21 pathways and the induction of DNA damage [ 125 ]. 5-FU treatment of Balb/c mice bearing C26 tumors resulted in reduced ERK signaling [ 126 ], which regulates muscle mass and slow-programming of skeletal muscle [ 127 ]. Slow-programming of skeletal muscle has been shown to be protective against force deficits in mouse models of muscle dystrophy [ 128 ], therefore suggesting that disruption of ERK signaling through chemotherapy may shift muscle to a fast fiber phenotype and therefore may be more susceptible to muscle loss. Pin and colleagues also showed that cancer and chemotherapy both shared and displayed unique alterations in muscle energy metabolism [ 129 ]. Mice administered chemotherapy also displayed reductions in NMJ health as measured by electromyography (EMG), and through western blotting for markers of the motor endplate such as Musk, Lrp4, Dok7 and Rapsyn [ 120 ]. Other causes of muscle atrophy following chemotherapy, such as an increase in inflammatory cytokines with associated elevation of markers of protein ubiquitination and autophagy have been described [ 130 ].
Chemotherapy-induced cachexia has been assessed in breast cancer models. The inoculation of MDA-MB-231 cells into the left ventricle of the heart of nude mice, or treatment with carboplatin resulted in wasting and weakness in the mice [ 131 ]. Combination treatment of both tumor cells and carboplatin did not have an additive effect, and cachexia severity remained similar to the MDA-MB-231-only group, despite a reduced tumor burden achieved with the therapy [ 131 ]. Administration of an aromatase inhibitor to nude mice reduced specific force of the extensor digitorum longus muscle [ 132 ]. In Balb/c mice injected with 4T1 cells into the flank, both tumor-bearing and paclitaxel chemotherapy reduced muscle and fat mass relative to non-tumor-bearing mice and once again, there was no additive effect of chemotherapy administration [ 133 ]. These studies demonstrate that chemotherapy induces muscle wasting in mice with breast cancer. The mechanisms may be distinct from tumor-induced muscle wasting and further studies are required to tease out the mechanisms behind these responses (Fig. 2 ). It is also important to note that chemotherapy agents can also reduce appetite [ 134 ], which may compound any direct effects on muscle strength and mass.
Radiation therapy may also contribute to cachexia progression in breast cancer (Fig. 2 ). In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients, lumbar skeletal muscle mass decreased during the course of radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy [ 135 ]. In nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, the mean weight loss during radiotherapy was 6.85% [ 136 ]. As reviewed by Pwrózek and colleagues, radiation therapy can lead to damage of structures in the digestive tract and sensory neurons that may alter food intake for cancer patients [ 137 ]. Radiation therapy can also alter taste and contribute to a loss of appetite, further exacerbating weight loss [ 137 ]. A study of pectoralis muscle quality measured by ultrasound, revealed that breast cancer survivors who had received radiation therapy either to the breast only, or to the breast and axillary lymph nodes had reduced muscle quality compared to healthy volunteers [ 138 ]. Furthermore, Wallner and colleagues demonstrated that pectoralis muscles from breast cancer patients who had undergone radiation therapy had increased neutrophil infiltration, more connective tissue and a gene signature indicative of muscle inflammation [ 139 ], indicating that radiation therapy may also cause damage to muscles in close proximity to the radiation exposure site (Fig. 2 ).
It is less clear if other breast cancer therapies, such as immunotherapy, contribute to cachexia progression. PD-1 blockade using nivolumab or pembrolizumab has been reported to cause muscle weakness, myalgia and increased serum creatine kinase levels [ 140 ], indicative of muscle damage. Furthermore, immunotherapy is well documented to cause peripheral neuropathy [ 141 ] (Fig. 2 ). As described previously, alterations in peripheral nerves have been reported to promote cancer-associated cachexia [ 118 , 119 , 140 ], highlighting the possibility that immunotherapy may exacerbate this motor neuron pathology. In cancer survivors who have received anti-PD1 therapy, there have been reports of neuromuscular disorders such as myasthenia gravis, immune-mediated myopathies, and Guillain–Barre syndrome [ 142 ]. Additionally, as with other treatment modalities, immune checkpoint inhibitors can also negatively affect appetite in cancer patients, which may compound cachexia progression [ 143 ]. Therefore, despite the emergence of immunotherapy as an exciting new treatment modality, it is important that patients are monitored closely for myopathies. Therefore, future research should investigate therapies to spare peripheral nerve health during immunotherapy treatment.
Modelling cachexia in metastatic breast cancer
There have been multiple recent reports of preclinical models to study cachexia in breast cancer (Fig. 3 ). A review from Tomasin and colleagues discussed the failure of many anti-cachectic agents in clinical trials. They highlighted the models with diverse age, presence of co-morbidities, chemotherapy administration and the fact that different models may be useful for testing potential new agents [ 144 ]. Their review promoted orthotopic tumor implantation and spontaneous metastatic models, to improve translatability. In the following section we review the current mouse models used to model cachexia in breast cancer. Fig. 3 Models of cachexia in breast cancer. Preclinical studies have utilized multiple different models in which to study cachexia in breast cancer, including cell culture, primary tumor, experimental metastasis, orthotopic metastasis and humanized models. The strengths and weaknesses of these models are highlighted on the right side of the figure. Created in BioRender. Saunders, A. (2026) https://BioRender.com/shs4o5d

In cell culture, CM from 4T1 tumor cells increased protein expression of E3 ligases such as Atrogin-1 and Murf-1, as well as LC3B in C2C12 myotubes as measured by western blotting [ 102 , 145 ]. 4T1 CM can also induce apoptosis in C2C12 myotubes, as revealed by elevated cleaved caspase-3 [ 102 ]. Similar results were observed following treatment of C2C12 muscle cells with CM from MDA-MB-231 cells [ 102 ]. While these data indicate that in vitro models may be useful screening tools to test mechanisms of cachexia, it is important to note that muscle cells in culture are relatively immature compared to mammalian skeletal muscle. Cells in culture are also devoid of cues from the motor nerve, infiltrating immune cells, a blood supply and crosstalk between other organs. Therefore, it is important that in vivo models are also used to accurately recapitulate cachexia biology.
Multiple studies have utilized models of primary breast tumors to study cachexia (Fig. 3 , Table 3 ). As summarized in Table 3 , mice engrafted orthotopically with MCF-7 cells develop only 5% body mass loss, with no reported lean or fat mass loss [ 55 ]. Engraftment of 4T1 cells into mice induces significant fat mass loss (Table 3 ), and between 22–38% muscle mass loss [ 146 , 147 ] (Table 3 ). However, another study reported no change in fat or lean mass in the 4T1 model [ 148 ]. These variable results in primary tumor models may reflect the relatively low prevalence of cachexia in breast cancer patients, where primary tumor cues alone may not frequently induce cachexia. Table 3 Summary of cachexia studies in breast cancer models Model Administration route Subtype Surgery Body mass loss Fat mass loss Muscle mass loss Myotube wasting ( in vitro ) Example Reference Breast cancer CM Conditioned media TNBC - - - - −64% PMID: 38973385 [ 102 ] PMID: 41042902 [ 106 ] PMID: 40810552 [ 145 ] 4T1 EV EV TNBC - N.R ~ 40–70% N.R - PMID: 37620316 [ 67 ] MDA-MB-231 EV EV TNBC - N.R ~ 30–80% N.R - PMID: 37620316 [ 67 ] MCF-7 EV EV Luminal A - N.R N.D N.R - PMID: 37620316 [ 67 ] PDX Orthotopic - - N.R N.R N.D - PMID: 30559167 [ 53 ] PMID: 38651826 [ 54 ] MCF-7 Orthotopic Luminal A - ~ 5% N.R N.R - PMID: 14633625 [ 55 ] PyMT Transgenic mouse Luminal B - ~ + 30% ~ 50% ~ + 5–10% - PMID: 28978719 [ 149 ] PMID: 33842876 [ 150 ] 4T1 Flank TNBC - N.D.- ~ + 9% N.D.- ~ 82% N.D.- ~ 22–38% - PMID: 27863332 [ 146 ] PMID: 35132306 [ 147 ] PMID: 27212031 [ 148 ] MDA-MB-231 Intracardiac TNBC - ~ 20% ~ 25% N.D.- ~ 20% - PMID: 26457758 [ 84 ] 4T1 Intravenous TNBC - ~ 15% N.R ~ 15% - PMID: 39266531 [ 112 ] 4T1 Intratibial TNBC - ~ 25% ~ 50% ~ 15%−35% - PMID: 29312148 [ 87 ] 4T1 Orthotopic TNBC - ~ 10% ~ 38% N.D - PMID: 38973385 [ 102 ] 4T1 Orthotopic TNBC Resected ~ 25% N.R N.R - PMID: 29875463 [ 78 ] 4T1.2 Orthotopic TNBC Resected N.D ~ 30% ~ 9–10% - PMID: 41042733 [ 79 ] Bard1 Transgenic mouse TNBC - ~ 15% N.R N.R - PMID: 32730698 [ 103 ] MDA-MB-231-HM Orthotopic TNBC Resected ~ 6.3% ~ 63% ~ 13–16% - PMID: 41042733 [ 79 ] EMT6.5 Orthotopic TNBC Resected ~ 18.3% ~ 75% ~ 15–17% - PMID: 41042733 [ 79 ] - = not reported in study, N.R. Not reported. N.D. Not different. PDX patient-derived xenograft TNBC triple-negative breast cancer. CM Conditioned media. EV Extracellular vesicle
Table 3
Summary of cachexia studies in breast cancer models
- = not reported in study, N.R. Not reported. N.D. Not different. PDX patient-derived xenograft TNBC triple-negative breast cancer. CM Conditioned media. EV Extracellular vesicle
| Model | Administration route | Subtype | Surgery | Body mass loss | Fat mass loss | Muscle mass loss | Myotube wasting ( in vitro ) | Example Reference |
| Breast cancer CM | Conditioned media | TNBC | - | - | - | - | −64% | PMID: 38973385 [ 102 ] PMID: 41042902 [ 106 ] PMID: 40810552 [ 145 ] |
| 4T1 EV | EV | TNBC | - | N.R | ~ 40–70% | N.R | - | PMID: 37620316 [ 67 ] |
| MDA-MB-231 EV | EV | TNBC | - | N.R | ~ 30–80% | N.R | - | PMID: 37620316 [ 67 ] |
| MCF-7 EV | EV | Luminal A | - | N.R | N.D | N.R | - | PMID: 37620316 [ 67 ] |
| PDX | Orthotopic | - | - | N.R | N.R | N.D | - | PMID: 30559167 [ 53 ] PMID: 38651826 [ 54 ] |
| MCF-7 | Orthotopic | Luminal A | - | ~ 5% | N.R | N.R | - | PMID: 14633625 [ 55 ] |
| PyMT | Transgenic mouse | Luminal B | - | ~ + 30% | ~ 50% | ~ + 5–10% | - | PMID: 28978719 [ 149 ] PMID: 33842876 [ 150 ] |
| 4T1 | Flank | TNBC | - | N.D.- ~ + 9% | N.D.- ~ 82% | N.D.- ~ 22–38% | - | PMID: 27863332 [ 146 ] PMID: 35132306 [ 147 ] PMID: 27212031 [ 148 ] |
| MDA-MB-231 | Intracardiac | TNBC | - | ~ 20% | ~ 25% | N.D.- ~ 20% | - | PMID: 26457758 [ 84 ] |
| 4T1 | Intravenous | TNBC | - | ~ 15% | N.R | ~ 15% | - | PMID: 39266531 [ 112 ] |
| 4T1 | Intratibial | TNBC | - | ~ 25% | ~ 50% | ~ 15%−35% | - | PMID: 29312148 [ 87 ] |
| 4T1 | Orthotopic | TNBC | - | ~ 10% | ~ 38% | N.D | - | PMID: 38973385 [ 102 ] |
| 4T1 | Orthotopic | TNBC | Resected | ~ 25% | N.R | N.R | - | PMID: 29875463 [ 78 ] |
| 4T1.2 | Orthotopic | TNBC | Resected | N.D | ~ 30% | ~ 9–10% | - | PMID: 41042733 [ 79 ] |
| Bard1 | Transgenic mouse | TNBC | - | ~ 15% | N.R | N.R | - | PMID: 32730698 [ 103 ] |
| MDA-MB-231-HM | Orthotopic | TNBC | Resected | ~ 6.3% | ~ 63% | ~ 13–16% | - | PMID: 41042733 [ 79 ] |
| EMT6.5 | Orthotopic | TNBC | Resected | ~ 18.3% | ~ 75% | ~ 15–17% | - | PMID: 41042733 [ 79 ] |
Experimental or ectopic models of metastasis have been utilized to model cachexia. For instance, intracardiac injection of MDA-MB-231 cells results in lean mass and fat mass loss [ 84 ] (Table 3 ), while intratibial injection of 4T1 cells results in muscle atrophy in the opposite leg [ 87 ]. There are distinct advantages of these experimental models that limit metastatic tumor growth to a specific organ ( e.g. bone), which may uncover organ-specific cachectic cues (Fig. 3 ). A limitation of these experimental metastatic models is that cues that allow cells to mobilize from the primary site, survive in the circulation and develop a metastatic niche for subsequent colonization are not considered. We therefore utilized three spontaneously metastatic models. Orthotopic injection of 4T1.2 cells followed by tumor resection led to a 30% loss of fat mass, and ~ 10% muscle mass loss [ 79 ] (Table 3 ) [ 79 ]. A similar response was observed when 4T1 primary tumors were resected to allow for metastasis development [ 78 ]. Administration of EMT6.5 cells via the same regimen resulted in a 75% loss of fat mass and a 15–17% loss of muscle mass [ 79 ] (Table 3 ). In transgenic PyMT mice muscle atrophy of 5–10% has been observed [ 149 , 150 ] (Table 3 ). Thus, orthotopic models of breast cancer can recapitulate the diversity of cachexia seen in breast cancer patients. Xenograft models have also been utilized to study cachexia. Studies such as those conducted by Waning and colleagues have shown that intracardiac injection of MDA-MB-231 cells results in approximately 15–20% loss in body and muscle mass [ 84 , 104 ]. Similarly with the replication of cachexia in immune-competent mice with orthotopic injection vs . experimental metastatic models, we have also shown that orthotopic injection of MDA-MB-231-HM cells results in approximately 15% loss of muscle mass [ 79 ].
In order to put the cachexia in these models in context, we compared the severity of cachexia to four models of cachexia. Morena and colleagues collated cachexia severity in C26, KPC, LLC and APC models in both male and females mice [ 151 ]. The values provided by the Morena et al., review were used as a reference to compare the degrees of body mass loss (Fig. 4 ). Fig. 4 Comparison of cachexia incidence across preclinical breast cancer models and common cachexia models. Values expressed as percentage body weight loss. Degree of cachexia in non-breast cancer models gathered from Morena et al., [ 43 ] . Created in BioRender. Saunders, A. (2026) https://BioRender.com/6lma97d

Conclusions and future directions
Although cancer rarely colonizes skeletal muscle [ 152 ], the health of these muscles can be significantly reduced in the setting of cancer. While cachexia in breast cancer does not occur as frequently as in other cancer types such as pancreatic, digestive and lung cancers, approximately a quarter of breast cancer patients will develop this debilitating condition, significantly impacting quality of life and response to cancer therapies. The prevalence is likely to be higher in patients with metastatic breast cancer, with estimates up to 50% of patients [ 5 , 40 ]. Furthermore, when taking into account the frequency of breast cancer, the incidence of cachexia becomes significant. It is therefore important that breast cancer is not overlooked in discussions of cachexia and we recommend the use of preclinical models that accurately recapitulate the biology of metastasis in breast cancer patients. There are a number of preclinical studies of cachexia in breast cancer, using primary cancer models, [ 146 – 148 ], experimental metastasis [ 87 ] and orthotopic models [ 79 ] (Fig. 3 ).
We have summarized the results from preclinical models in current use to investigate mechanisms of muscle weakness and wasting in breast cancer. Primary breast tumor models [ 55 , 146 – 150 ], and experimental metastatic models ( e.g. injection into the circulation or directly in metastatic sites) [ 84 , 87 ] have the advantage of localization of tumor cells to one or few organs, but they do not reflect the biology of metastasis in patients. Recently, spontaneous metastasis models arising from an orthotopic primary tumor that may be more reflective of metastatic biology [ 153 ] have been utilized [ 78 , 79 ]. We recommend that future studies take advantage of orthotopic models where the primary tumor is localized in the mammary gland and spontaneous metastases develop in different organs.
Future studies should further investigate the mechanisms leading to muscle weakness and wasting caused by existing standard of care therapies, such as chemotherapy. Clinical and preclinical studies should also consider analysis of muscle function and mass following emerging therapies for breast cancer such as CDK4/6 inhibitors, PARP inhibitors, immunotherapy and CAR-T cell therapies. Emergence of more targeted therapies such as antibody–drug conjugates will hopefully lead to reduced toxicity and cause fewer muscle deficits [ 154 ]. However, more research is required on this topic, as nonspecific uptake of the antibody–drug conjugates in peripheral nerves is documented, which can lead to inhibition of axonal firing and degeneration of peripheral nerves [ 155 , 156 ], which can manifest as muscle weakness [ 155 ].
Factors secreted from different metastatic lesions that contribute to cachexia in breast cancer should be another area of active investigation. For example, do patients with liver or lung metastases have similar cachectic pathology? Secretion of cytokines such as TGF-β from bone metastatic lesions has been well characterized in preclinical models, however the signals from other metastatic lesions are not well resolved. A comparison of the cachectic factors secreted from more mild models of breast cancer cachexia (such as 4T1) with those from more severely cachectic models (such as EMT6.5) will help to uncover novel regulators of cachexia in metastatic cancer. Understanding these unique atrophy-inducing cytokines may lead to the discovery of novel therapeutic targets that could be tested preclinically/clinically and could lead to more personalized therapies depending on both the type of cancer, and distribution of metastatic lesions present in a patient.
In summary, cachexia affects a significant proportion of breast cancer patients; however, relatively few preclinical studies of cachexia have been published. Mouse models are an essential tool for researchers to understand cancer biology. Complications from cancer such as cachexia occur from the culmination of crosstalk between tumor cells, visceral organs, fat and muscle [ 157 ]. As reviewed herein, orthotopic models of breast cancer may provide a novel tool to understand the mechanisms of cachexia in the context of metastasis. Effective therapies and interventions against cancer cachexia have the potential to improve response to cancer therapy, and to improve the quality of life of metastatic cancer patients, highlighting the importance of understanding the drivers of cachexia in the context of metastatic breast cancer.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 (XLSX 13 KB)
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Author contributions
A.A.E.S., & P.G., conceptualized the manuscript, A.A.E.S., drafted the manuscript and prepared figures, R.L.A., & P.G., edited and provided critical revisions of the manuscript, all authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions Experimental work on this topic was supported by a Pink Sky Grant (2025/PS0110) from the National Breast Cancer Foundation (Australia) to P.G. & R.L.A. and a Catalyst grant (EMCR_CAT20259) from the Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences at The University of Melbourne (Australia) awarded to A.A.E.S. P.G. was supported by an Investigator Grant (APP2017070) from the National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia).
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
1. Boire, A., Burke, K., Cox, T. R., Guise, T., Jamal-Hanjani, M., Janowitz, T., et al. (2024). Why do patients with cancer die? Nature Reviews Cancer , 1-12. 10.1038/s41568-024-00708-4 10.1038/s41568-024-00708-4 PMC7616303 38898221
2. Baracos VE Martin L Korc M Guttridge DC Fearon KCH Cancer-associated cachexia Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2018 4 17105 10.1038/nrdp.2017.105 29345251 Baracos, V. E., Martin, L., Korc, M., Guttridge, D. C., & Fearon, K. C. H. (2018). Cancer-associated cachexia. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 4 , 17105. 10.1038/nrdp.2017.105 29345251 10.1038/nrdp.2017.105
3. Kasvis P Vigano M Vigano A Health-related quality of life across cancer cachexia stages Annals of Palliative Medicine 2019 8 1 33 42 10.21037/apm.2018.08.04 30525763 Kasvis, P., Vigano, M., & Vigano, A. (2019). Health-related quality of life across cancer cachexia stages. Annals of Palliative Medicine, 8 (1), 33–42. 10.21037/apm.2018.08.04 30525763 10.21037/apm.2018.08.04
4. Shiono M Huang K Downey RJ Consul N Villanueva N Beck K An analysis of the relationship between metastases and cachexia in lung cancer patients Cancer Medicine 2016 5 9 2641 2648 10.1002/cam4.841 27485414 PMC5055184 Shiono, M., Huang, K., Downey, R. J., Consul, N., Villanueva, N., Beck, K., et al. (2016). An analysis of the relationship between metastases and cachexia in lung cancer patients. Cancer Medicine, 5 (9), 2641–2648. 10.1002/cam4.841 27485414 10.1002/cam4.841 PMC5055184
5. Orellana López C LeytonEstéfane J Ramos Rosales M VásquezRamÍrez C ManriquezArriagada C Argilés JM Prevalence of cachexia in cancer patients European Journal of Cancer Care 2023 2023 1 5743872 10.1155/2023/5743872 Orellana López, C., LeytonEstéfane, J., Ramos Rosales, M., VásquezRamÍrez, C., ManriquezArriagada, C., Argilés, J. M., et al. (2023). Prevalence of cachexia in cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer Care, 2023 (1), 5743872.
6. Zhang X-M Dou Q-L Zeng Y Yang Y Cheng AS Zhang W-W Sarcopenia as a predictor of mortality in women with breast cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review BMC Cancer 2020 20 1 172 10.1186/s12885-020-6645-6 32131764 PMC7057618 Zhang, X.-M., Dou, Q.-L., Zeng, Y., Yang, Y., Cheng, A. S., & Zhang, W.-W. (2020). Sarcopenia as a predictor of mortality in women with breast cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Cancer, 20 (1), Article 172. 10.1186/s12885-020-6645-6 32131764 10.1186/s12885-020-6645-6 PMC7057618
7. Deng H-Y Hou L Zha P Huang K-L Peng L Sarcopenia is an independent unfavorable prognostic factor of non-small cell lung cancer after surgical resection: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2019 45 5 728 735 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.09.026 30348603 Deng, H.-Y., Hou, L., Zha, P., Huang, K.-L., & Peng, L. (2019). Sarcopenia is an independent unfavorable prognostic factor of non-small cell lung cancer after surgical resection: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 45 (5), 728–735. 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.09.026 30348603 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.09.026
8. Kamarajah SK Bundred J Tan BH Body composition assessment and sarcopenia in patients with gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis Gastric Cancer 2019 22 1 10 22 10.1007/s10120-018-0882-2 30276574 Kamarajah, S. K., Bundred, J., & Tan, B. H. (2019). Body composition assessment and sarcopenia in patients with gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer, 22 (1), 10–22. 10.1007/s10120-018-0882-2 30276574 10.1007/s10120-018-0882-2
9. Sun G Li Y Peng Y Lu D Zhang F Cui X Can sarcopenia be a predictor of prognosis for patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2018 33 10 1419 1427 10.1007/s00384-018-3128-1 29987364 Sun, G., Li, Y., Peng, Y., Lu, D., Zhang, F., Cui, X., et al. (2018). Can sarcopenia be a predictor of prognosis for patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 33 (10), 1419–1427. 10.1007/s00384-018-3128-1 29987364 10.1007/s00384-018-3128-1
10. Mason MC Garcia JM Sansgiry S Walder A Berger DH Anaya DA Preoperative cancer cachexia and short-term outcomes following surgery Journal of Surgical Research 2016 205 2 398 406 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.076 27664889 Mason, M. C., Garcia, J. M., Sansgiry, S., Walder, A., Berger, D. H., & Anaya, D. A. (2016). Preoperative cancer cachexia and short-term outcomes following surgery. Journal of Surgical Research, 205 (2), 398–406. 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.076 27664889 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.076
11. Consul N Guo X Coker C Lopez-Pintado S Hibshoosh H Zhao B Monitoring metastasis and cachexia in a patient with breast cancer: A case study Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology 2016 10.4137/CMO.S40479 27660506 PMC5019129 Consul, N., Guo, X., Coker, C., Lopez-Pintado, S., Hibshoosh, H., Zhao, B., et al. (2016). Monitoring metastasis and cachexia in a patient with breast cancer: A case study. Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology . 10.4137/CMO.S40479 27660506 10.4137/CMO.S40479 PMC5019129
12. Liu N Li S Jia J Qiao Y Li Y Advanced breast cancer with cachexia: A case report Medicine 2021 100 4 e24397 10.1097/MD.0000000000024397 33530236 PMC7850648 Liu, N., Li, S., Jia, J., Qiao, Y., & Li, Y. (2021). Advanced breast cancer with cachexia: A case report. Medicine, 100 (4), Article e24397. 10.1097/MD.0000000000024397 33530236 10.1097/MD.0000000000024397 PMC7850648
13. Fearon K Strasser F Anker SD Bosaeus I Bruera E Fainsinger RL Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: An international consensus The Lancet Oncology 2011 12 5 489 495 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7 21296615 Fearon, K., Strasser, F., Anker, S. D., Bosaeus, I., Bruera, E., Fainsinger, R. L., et al. (2011). Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: An international consensus. The Lancet Oncology, 12 (5), 489–495. 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7 21296615 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7
14. Pressoir M Desne S Berchery D Rossignol G Poiree B Meslier M Prevalence, risk factors and clinical implications of malnutrition in French comprehensive cancer centres British Journal of Cancer 2010 102 6 966 971 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605578 20160725 PMC2844030 Pressoir, M., Desne, S., Berchery, D., Rossignol, G., Poiree, B., Meslier, M., et al. (2010). Prevalence, risk factors and clinical implications of malnutrition in French comprehensive cancer centres. British Journal of Cancer, 102 (6), 966–971. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605578 20160725 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605578 PMC2844030
15. Hebuterne X Lemarie E Michallet M de Montreuil CB Schneider SM Goldwasser F Prevalence of malnutrition and current use of nutrition support in patients with cancer JPEN Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 2014 38 2 196 204 10.1177/0148607113502674 24748626 Hebuterne, X., Lemarie, E., Michallet, M., de Montreuil, C. B., Schneider, S. M., & Goldwasser, F. (2014). Prevalence of malnutrition and current use of nutrition support in patients with cancer. JPEN Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 38 (2), 196–204. 10.1177/0148607113502674 24748626 10.1177/0148607113502674
16. Muscaritoli M Lucia S Farcomeni A Lorusso V Saracino V Barone C Prevalence of malnutrition in patients at first medical oncology visit: The PreMiO study Oncotarget 2017 8 45 79884 79896 10.18632/oncotarget.20168 29108370 PMC5668103 Muscaritoli, M., Lucia, S., Farcomeni, A., Lorusso, V., Saracino, V., Barone, C., et al. (2017). Prevalence of malnutrition in patients at first medical oncology visit: The PreMiO study. Oncotarget, 8 (45), 79884–79896. 10.18632/oncotarget.20168 29108370 10.18632/oncotarget.20168 PMC5668103
17. Li, Z., Chen, W., Li, H., Zhao, B., & Chinese Oncology Nutrition Survey, G. (2018). Nutrition support in hospitalized cancer patients with malnutrition in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 27 (6), 1216–1224, 10.6133/apjcn.201811_27(6).0007. 10.6133/apjcn.201811_27(6).0007 30485919
18. Gilmore LA Willmann J Olaechea S Gilmore BW Dee EC Rao M Prevalence and development of cachexia before and after diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer American Journal of Clinical Oncology 2025 48 9 470 476 10.1097/COC.0000000000001211 40323088 Gilmore, L. A., Willmann, J., Olaechea, S., Gilmore, B. W., Dee, E. C., Rao, M., et al. (2025). Prevalence and development of cachexia before and after diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer. American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 48 (9), 470–476. 10.1097/COC.0000000000001211 40323088 10.1097/COC.0000000000001211
19. Takaoka T Yaegashi A Watanabe D Prevalence of and survival with cachexia among patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis Advances in Nutrition 2024 15 9 100282 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100282 39127425 PMC11402144 Takaoka, T., Yaegashi, A., & Watanabe, D. (2024). Prevalence of and survival with cachexia among patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Advances in Nutrition, 15 (9), Article 100282. 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100282 39127425 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100282 PMC11402144
20. Rich NE Phen S Desai N Mittal S Yopp AC Yang JD Cachexia is prevalent in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and associated with worse prognosis Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2022 20 5 e1157 e1169 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.09.022 34555519 PMC8934317 Rich, N. E., Phen, S., Desai, N., Mittal, S., Yopp, A. C., Yang, J. D., et al. (2022). Cachexia is prevalent in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and associated with worse prognosis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 20 (5), e1157–e1169. 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.09.022 34555519 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.09.022 PMC8934317
21. Zhang H Zhang Y Tang X Zhang S Man C Gong D The prevalence and prognostic impact of cancer cachexia on overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: A meta-analysis Nutrition and Cancer 2025 77 6 590 599 10.1080/01635581.2025.2492126 40241395 Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Tang, X., Zhang, S., Man, C., Gong, D., et al. (2025). The prevalence and prognostic impact of cancer cachexia on overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: A meta-analysis. Nutrition and Cancer, 77 (6), 590–599. 10.1080/01635581.2025.2492126 40241395 10.1080/01635581.2025.2492126
22. March C Omari J Thormann M Pech M Wienke A Surov A Prevalence and role of low skeletal muscle mass (LSMM) in hepatocellular carcinoma. A systematic review and meta-analysis Clinical Nutrition ESPEN 2022 49 103 113 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.04.009 35623801 March, C., Omari, J., Thormann, M., Pech, M., Wienke, A., & Surov, A. (2022). Prevalence and role of low skeletal muscle mass (LSMM) in hepatocellular carcinoma. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 49 , 103–113. 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.04.009 35623801 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.04.009
23. Anker MS Holcomb R Muscaritoli M von Haehling S Haverkamp W Jatoi A Orphan disease status of cancer cachexia in the USA and in the European Union: A systematic review Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 2019 10 1 22 34 10.1002/jcsm.12402 30920776 PMC6438416 Anker, M. S., Holcomb, R., Muscaritoli, M., von Haehling, S., Haverkamp, W., Jatoi, A., et al. (2019). Orphan disease status of cancer cachexia in the USA and in the European Union: A systematic review. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 10 (1), 22–34. 10.1002/jcsm.12402 30920776 10.1002/jcsm.12402 PMC6438416
24. Poisson J Martinez-Tapia C Heitz D Geiss R Albrand G Falandry C Prevalence and prognostic impact of cachexia among older patients with cancer: A nationwide cross-sectional survey (NutriAgeCancer) Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 2021 12 6 1477 1488 10.1002/jcsm.12776 34519440 PMC8718093 Poisson, J., Martinez-Tapia, C., Heitz, D., Geiss, R., Albrand, G., Falandry, C., et al. (2021). Prevalence and prognostic impact of cachexia among older patients with cancer: A nationwide cross-sectional survey (NutriAgeCancer). Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 12 (6), 1477–1488. 10.1002/jcsm.12776 34519440 10.1002/jcsm.12776 PMC8718093
25. Shukuya T Takahashi K Shintani Y Miura K Sekine I Takayama K Epidemiology, risk factors and impact of cachexia on patient outcome: Results from the Japanese Lung Cancer Registry Study Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 2023 14 3 1274 1285 10.1002/jcsm.13216 36905129 PMC10235893 Shukuya, T., Takahashi, K., Shintani, Y., Miura, K., Sekine, I., Takayama, K., et al. (2023). Epidemiology, risk factors and impact of cachexia on patient outcome: Results from the Japanese Lung Cancer Registry Study. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 14 (3), 1274–1285. 10.1002/jcsm.13216 36905129 10.1002/jcsm.13216 PMC10235893
26. Vagnildhaug OM Balstad TR Almberg SS Brunelli C Knudsen AK Kaasa S A cross-sectional study examining the prevalence of cachexia and areas of unmet need in patients with cancer Supportive Care in Cancer 2018 26 6 1871 1880 10.1007/s00520-017-4022-z 29274028 Vagnildhaug, O. M., Balstad, T. R., Almberg, S. S., Brunelli, C., Knudsen, A. K., Kaasa, S., et al. (2018). A cross-sectional study examining the prevalence of cachexia and areas of unmet need in patients with cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 26 (6), 1871–1880. 10.1007/s00520-017-4022-z 29274028 10.1007/s00520-017-4022-z
27. Kwon M Kim RB Roh JL Lee SW Kim SB Choi SH Prevalence and clinical significance of cancer cachexia based on time from treatment in advanced-stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Head & Neck 2017 39 4 716 723 10.1002/hed.24672 28000343 Kwon, M., Kim, R. B., Roh, J. L., Lee, S. W., Kim, S. B., Choi, S. H., et al. (2017). Prevalence and clinical significance of cancer cachexia based on time from treatment in advanced-stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head & Neck, 39 (4), 716–723. 10.1002/hed.24672 28000343 10.1002/hed.24672
28. Zhang J Tang X Zhang W Xu Y Zhang H Fan Y Cancer cachexia as a predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis Clinical Nutrition 2024 43 7 1618 1625 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.05.025 38788267 Zhang, J., Tang, X., Zhang, W., Xu, Y., Zhang, H., & Fan, Y. (2024). Cancer cachexia as a predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis. Clinical Nutrition, 43 (7), 1618–1625. 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.05.025 38788267 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.05.025
29. Namikawa T Marui A Yokota K Fujieda Y Munekage M Uemura S Frequency and prognostic impact of cachexia during drug treatment for unresectable advanced gastric cancer patients Surgery Today 2022 52 11 1560 1567 10.1007/s00595-022-02493-9 35322296 Namikawa, T., Marui, A., Yokota, K., Fujieda, Y., Munekage, M., Uemura, S., et al. (2022). Frequency and prognostic impact of cachexia during drug treatment for unresectable advanced gastric cancer patients. Surgery Today, 52 (11), 1560–1567. 10.1007/s00595-022-02493-9 35322296 10.1007/s00595-022-02493-9
30. Mitsunaga S Kasamatsu E Machii K Incidence and frequency of cancer cachexia during chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma Supportive Care in Cancer 2020 28 11 5271 5279 10.1007/s00520-020-05346-8 32103356 PMC7546994 Mitsunaga, S., Kasamatsu, E., & Machii, K. (2020). Incidence and frequency of cancer cachexia during chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Supportive Care in Cancer, 28 (11), 5271–5279. 10.1007/s00520-020-05346-8 32103356 10.1007/s00520-020-05346-8 PMC7546994
31. Dijksterhuis WPM Latenstein AEJ van Kleef JJ Verhoeven RHA de Vries JHM Slingerland M Cachexia and dietetic interventions in patients with esophagogastric cancer: A multicenter cohort study Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2021 19 2 144 152 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7615 33418527 Dijksterhuis, W. P. M., Latenstein, A. E. J., van Kleef, J. J., Verhoeven, R. H. A., de Vries, J. H. M., Slingerland, M., et al. (2021). Cachexia and dietetic interventions in patients with esophagogastric cancer: A multicenter cohort study. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 19 (2), 144–152. 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7615 33418527 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7615
32. Latenstein AEJ Dijksterhuis WPM Mackay TM Beijer S van Eijck CHJ de Hingh I Cachexia, dietetic consultation, and survival in patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer: A multicenter cohort study Cancer Medicine 2020 9 24 9385 9395 10.1002/cam4.3556 33107709 PMC7774726 Latenstein, A. E. J., Dijksterhuis, W. P. M., Mackay, T. M., Beijer, S., van Eijck, C. H. J., de Hingh, I., et al. (2020). Cachexia, dietetic consultation, and survival in patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer: A multicenter cohort study. Cancer Medicine, 9 (24), 9385–9395. 10.1002/cam4.3556 33107709 10.1002/cam4.3556 PMC7774726
33. Olaechea S Sarver B Liu A Gilmore LA Alvarez C Iyengar P Race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors as determinants of cachexia incidence and outcomes in a retrospective cohort of patients with gastrointestinal tract cancer JCO Oncology Practice 2023 19 7 493 500 10.1200/OP.22.00674 37099735 PMC10337717 Olaechea, S., Sarver, B., Liu, A., Gilmore, L. A., Alvarez, C., Iyengar, P., et al. (2023). Race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors as determinants of cachexia incidence and outcomes in a retrospective cohort of patients with gastrointestinal tract cancer. JCO Oncology Practice, 19 (7), 493–500. 10.1200/OP.22.00674 37099735 10.1200/OP.22.00674 PMC10337717
34. Gannavarapu BS Lau SKM Carter K Cannon NA Gao A Ahn C Prevalence and survival impact of pretreatment cancer-associated weight loss: A tool for guiding early palliative care Journal of Oncology Practice 2018 14 4 e238 e250 10.1200/JOP.2017.025221 29466074 PMC5951294 Gannavarapu, B. S., Lau, S. K. M., Carter, K., Cannon, N. A., Gao, A., Ahn, C., et al. (2018). Prevalence and survival impact of pretreatment cancer-associated weight loss: A tool for guiding early palliative care. Journal of Oncology Practice, 14 (4), e238–e250. 10.1200/JOP.2017.025221 29466074 10.1200/JOP.2017.025221 PMC5951294
35. Shibata M Fukahori M Kasamatsu E Machii K Hamauchi S A retrospective cohort study to investigate the incidence of cachexia during chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer Advances in Therapy 2020 37 12 5010 5022 10.1007/s12325-020-01516-6 33067699 PMC7595989 Shibata, M., Fukahori, M., Kasamatsu, E., Machii, K., & Hamauchi, S. (2020). A retrospective cohort study to investigate the incidence of cachexia during chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer. Advances in Therapy, 37 (12), 5010–5022. 10.1007/s12325-020-01516-6 33067699 10.1007/s12325-020-01516-6 PMC7595989
36. Nemer L Krishna SG Shah ZK Conwell DL Cruz-Monserrate Z Dillhoff M Predictors of pancreatic cancer-associated weight loss and nutritional interventions Pancreas 2017 46 9 1152 1157 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000898 28902785 PMC5679236 Nemer, L., Krishna, S. G., Shah, Z. K., Conwell, D. L., Cruz-Monserrate, Z., Dillhoff, M., et al. (2017). Predictors of pancreatic cancer-associated weight loss and nutritional interventions. Pancreas, 46 (9), 1152–1157. 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000898 28902785 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000898 PMC5679236
37. Sun L Quan XQ Yu S An epidemiological survey of cachexia in advanced cancer patients and analysis on its diagnostic and treatment status Nutrition and Cancer 2015 67 7 1056 1062 10.1080/01635581.2015.1073753 26317149 Sun, L., Quan, X. Q., & Yu, S. (2015). An epidemiological survey of cachexia in advanced cancer patients and analysis on its diagnostic and treatment status. Nutrition and Cancer, 67 (7), 1056–1062. 10.1080/01635581.2015.1073753 26317149 10.1080/01635581.2015.1073753
38. Fukahori M Shibata M Hamauchi S Kasamatsu E Machii K A retrospective cohort study to investigate the incidence of cancer-related weight loss during chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients Supportive Care in Cancer 2021 29 1 341 348 10.1007/s00520-020-05479-w 32361831 PMC7686005 Fukahori, M., Shibata, M., Hamauchi, S., Kasamatsu, E., & Machii, K. (2021). A retrospective cohort study to investigate the incidence of cancer-related weight loss during chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 29 (1), 341–348. 10.1007/s00520-020-05479-w 32361831 10.1007/s00520-020-05479-w PMC7686005
39. Katsushima U Kurose S Fukushima T Nakano J Ogushi N Fujii K Impact of time to treatment initiation on the development of cachexia and clinical outcomes in lung cancer Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2025 55 5 505 513 10.1093/jjco/hyaf009 39825794 Katsushima, U., Kurose, S., Fukushima, T., Nakano, J., Ogushi, N., Fujii, K., et al. (2025). Impact of time to treatment initiation on the development of cachexia and clinical outcomes in lung cancer. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 55 (5), 505–513. 10.1093/jjco/hyaf009 39825794 10.1093/jjco/hyaf009
40. Camilleri GM Delrieu L Bouleuc C Pierga JY Cottu P Berger F Prevalence and survival implications of malnutrition and sarcopenia in metastatic breast cancer: A longitudinal analysis Clinical Nutrition 2024 43 8 1710 1718 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.06.014 38908032 Camilleri, G. M., Delrieu, L., Bouleuc, C., Pierga, J. Y., Cottu, P., Berger, F., et al. (2024). Prevalence and survival implications of malnutrition and sarcopenia in metastatic breast cancer: A longitudinal analysis. Clinical Nutrition, 43 (8), 1710–1718. 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.06.014 38908032 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.06.014
41. National cancer stage at diagnosis data (2018). https://ncci.canceraustralia.gov.au/features/national-cancer-stage-diagnosis-data . Accessed 11/12 2025
42. Worldwide Cancer Data (2024). https://www.wcrf.org/preventing-cancer/cancer-statistics/worldwide-cancer-data/ . Accessed 7/3 2025
43. Morena F Cabrera AR Jones RG 3rd Schrems ER Muhyudin R Washington TA Transcriptional analysis of cancer cachexia: Conserved and unique features across preclinical models and biological sex American Journal of Physiology, Cell Physiology 2024 327 6 C1514 C1531 10.1152/ajpcell.00647.2024 39466180 PMC11684872 Morena, F., Cabrera, A. R., Jones, R. G., 3rd., Schrems, E. R., Muhyudin, R., Washington, T. A., et al. (2024). Transcriptional analysis of cancer cachexia: Conserved and unique features across preclinical models and biological sex. American Journal of Physiology, Cell Physiology, 327 (6), C1514–C1531. 10.1152/ajpcell.00647.2024 39466180 10.1152/ajpcell.00647.2024 PMC11684872
44. Zhong X Zimmers TA Sex differences in cancer cachexia Current Osteoporosis Reports 2020 18 6 646 654 10.1007/s11914-020-00628-w 33044689 PMC7732790 Zhong, X., & Zimmers, T. A. (2020). Sex differences in cancer cachexia. Current Osteoporosis Reports, 18 (6), 646–654. 10.1007/s11914-020-00628-w 33044689 10.1007/s11914-020-00628-w PMC7732790
45. Dewys, W. D., Begg, C., Lavin, P. T., Band, P. R., Bennett, J. M., Bertino, J. R., et al. (1980). Prognostic effect of weight loss prior to chemotherapy in cancer patients. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. American Journal of Medicine, 69 (4), 491-497, 10.1016/s0149-2918(05)80001-3 10.1016/s0149-2918(05)80001-3 7424938
46. Jang MK Park S Park C Raszewski R Park S Kim S Sarcopenia in patients with metastatic breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis Breast 2025 82 104508 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104508 40446428 PMC12159878 Jang, M. K., Park, S., Park, C., Raszewski, R., Park, S., & Kim, S. (2025). Sarcopenia in patients with metastatic breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast, 82 , Article 104508. 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104508 40446428 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104508 PMC12159878
47. Putri, G. N., Manikam, N. R. M., Andayani, D. E., Trismiyanti, & Halim, L. (2023). Successful nutritional therapy at home for a patient with invasive breast carcinoma: A case report. Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing, 10 , 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100250. 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100250 PMC10772168 38197045
48. Guigni BA Callahan DM Tourville TW Miller MS Fiske B Voigt T Skeletal muscle atrophy and dysfunction in breast cancer patients: Role for chemotherapy-derived oxidant stress American Journal of Physiology, Cell Physiology 2018 315 5 C744 C756 10.1152/ajpcell.00002.2018 30207784 PMC6293050 Guigni, B. A., Callahan, D. M., Tourville, T. W., Miller, M. S., Fiske, B., Voigt, T., et al. (2018). Skeletal muscle atrophy and dysfunction in breast cancer patients: Role for chemotherapy-derived oxidant stress. American Journal of Physiology, Cell Physiology, 315 (5), C744–C756. 10.1152/ajpcell.00002.2018 30207784 10.1152/ajpcell.00002.2018 PMC6293050
49. Fuentes-Abolafio IJ Roldán-Jiménez C Campos MI Pajares-Hachero BI Alba-Conejo E Cuesta-Vargas A Forearm muscle activity during the handgrip test in breast cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study Clinical Breast Cancer 2023 23 4 e175 e181 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.01.008 36803839 Fuentes-Abolafio, I. J., Roldán-Jiménez, C., Campos, M. I., Pajares-Hachero, B. I., Alba-Conejo, E., & Cuesta-Vargas, A. (2023). Forearm muscle activity during the handgrip test in breast cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study. Clinical Breast Cancer, 23 (4), e175–e181. 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.01.008 36803839 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.01.008
50. Bohlen J McLaughlin SL Hazard‐Jenkins H Infante AM Montgomery C Davis M Dysregulation of metabolic‐associated pathways in muscle of breast cancer patients: Preclinical evaluation of interleukin‐15 targeting fatigue Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 2018 9 4 701 714 10.1002/jcsm.12294 29582584 PMC6104109 Bohlen, J., McLaughlin, S. L., Hazard‐Jenkins, H., Infante, A. M., Montgomery, C., Davis, M., et al. (2018). Dysregulation of metabolic‐associated pathways in muscle of breast cancer patients: Preclinical evaluation of interleukin‐15 targeting fatigue. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 9 (4), 701–714. 10.1002/jcsm.12294 29582584 10.1002/jcsm.12294 PMC6104109
51. Rentz LE Dierkes MK Vettiyil B Holásková I Pistilli EE Characterization of body composition dynamics throughout treatment in patients with early-stage breast cancer NPJ Breast Cancer 2026 10.1038/s41523-026-00933-0 41904154 PMC13230885 Rentz, L. E., Dierkes, M. K., Vettiyil, B., Holásková, I., & Pistilli, E. E. (2026). Characterization of body composition dynamics throughout treatment in patients with early-stage breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer . 10.1038/s41523-026-00933-0 41904154 10.1038/s41523-026-00933-0 PMC13230885
52. Mijwel S Cardinale DA Norrbom J Chapman M Ivarsson N Wengstrom Y Exercise training during chemotherapy preserves skeletal muscle fiber area, capillarization, and mitochondrial content in patients with breast cancer The FASEB Journal 2018 32 10 5495 5505 10.1096/fj.201700968R 29750574 Mijwel, S., Cardinale, D. A., Norrbom, J., Chapman, M., Ivarsson, N., Wengstrom, Y., et al. (2018). Exercise training during chemotherapy preserves skeletal muscle fiber area, capillarization, and mitochondrial content in patients with breast cancer. The FASEB Journal, 32 (10), 5495–5505. 10.1096/fj.201700968R 29750574 10.1096/fj.201700968R
53. Wilson HE Rhodes KK Rodriguez D Chahal I Stanton DA Bohlen J Human breast cancer xenograft model implicates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor signaling as driver of cancer-induced muscle fatigue Clinical Cancer Research 2019 25 7 2336 2347 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1565 30559167 PMC6445680 Wilson, H. E., Rhodes, K. K., Rodriguez, D., Chahal, I., Stanton, D. A., Bohlen, J., et al. (2019). Human breast cancer xenograft model implicates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor signaling as driver of cancer-induced muscle fatigue. Clinical Cancer Research, 25 (7), 2336–2347. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1565 30559167 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1565 PMC6445680
54. Wang R Khatpe AS Kumar B Mang HE Batic K Adebayo AK Mutant RAS-driven secretome causes skeletal muscle defects in breast cancer Cancer Research Communications 2024 4 5 1282 1295 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-24-0045 38651826 PMC11094532 Wang, R., Khatpe, A. S., Kumar, B., Mang, H. E., Batic, K., Adebayo, A. K., et al. (2024). Mutant RAS-driven secretome causes skeletal muscle defects in breast cancer. Cancer Research Communications, 4 (5), 1282–1295. 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-24-0045 38651826 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-24-0045 PMC11094532
55. Kumar S Kishimoto H Chua HL Badve S Miller KD Bigsby RM Interleukin-1α promotes tumor growth and cachexia in MCF-7 xenograft model of breast cancer American Journal of Pathology 2003 163 6 2531 2541 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63608-5 14633625 PMC1892398 Kumar, S., Kishimoto, H., Chua, H. L., Badve, S., Miller, K. D., Bigsby, R. M., et al. (2003). Interleukin-1α promotes tumor growth and cachexia in MCF-7 xenograft model of breast cancer. American Journal of Pathology, 163 (6), 2531–2541. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63608-5 14633625 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63608-5 PMC1892398
56. Baracos, V., Rodemann, H. P., Dinarello, C. A., & Goldberg, A. L. (1983). Stimulation of muscle protein degradation and prostaglandin E2 release by leukocytic pyrogen (interleukin-1). A mechanism for the increased degradation of muscle proteins during fever. New England Journal of Medicine, 308 (10), 553–558, 10.1056/NEJM198303103081002. 10.1056/NEJM198303103081002 6402699
57. Fong Y Moldawer LL Marano M He W Barber A Manogue K Cachectin/TNF or IL-1-alpha induces cachexia with redistribution of body proteins American Journal of Physiology 1989 256 3 R659 R665 10.1152/ajpregu.1989.256.3.R659 2784290 Fong, Y., Moldawer, L. L., Marano, M., He, W., Barber, A., Manogue, K., et al. (1989). Cachectin/TNF or IL-1-alpha induces cachexia with redistribution of body proteins. American Journal of Physiology, 256 (3), R659–R665. 10.1152/ajpregu.1989.256.3.R659 2784290 10.1152/ajpregu.1989.256.3.R659
58. Freire PP Fernandez GJ de Moraes D Cury SS Dal Pai-Silva M Dos Reis PP The expression landscape of cachexia-inducing factors in human cancers Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 2020 11 4 947 961 10.1002/jcsm.12565 32125790 PMC7432594 Freire, P. P., Fernandez, G. J., de Moraes, D., Cury, S. S., Dal Pai-Silva, M., Dos Reis, P. P., et al. (2020). The expression landscape of cachexia-inducing factors in human cancers. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 11 (4), 947–961. 10.1002/jcsm.12565 32125790 10.1002/jcsm.12565 PMC7432594
59. Laird BJ McMillan D Skipworth RJE Fallon MT Paval DR McNeish I The emerging role of interleukin 1beta (IL-1beta) in cancer cachexia Inflammation 2021 44 4 1223 1228 10.1007/s10753-021-01429-8 33907915 PMC8285330 Laird, B. J., McMillan, D., Skipworth, R. J. E., Fallon, M. T., Paval, D. R., McNeish, I., et al. (2021). The emerging role of interleukin 1beta (IL-1beta) in cancer cachexia. Inflammation, 44 (4), 1223–1228. 10.1007/s10753-021-01429-8 33907915 10.1007/s10753-021-01429-8 PMC8285330
60 Dinarello CA An expanding role for interleukin-1 blockade from gout to cancer Molecular Medicine 2014 20 Suppl 1 S43 58 10.2119/molmed.2014.00232 25549233 PMC4374514 Dinarello, C. A. (2014). An expanding role for interleukin-1 blockade from gout to cancer. Molecular Medicine, 20 (Suppl 1), S43-58. 10.2119/molmed.2014.00232 25549233 10.2119/molmed.2014.00232 PMC4374514
61. Rupert, J. E., Narasimhan, A., Jengelley, D. H. A., Jiang, Y., Liu, J., Au, E., et al. (2021). Tumor-derived IL-6 and trans-signaling among tumor, fat, and muscle mediate pancreatic cancer cachexia. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 218 (6), 10.1084/jem.20190450. 10.1084/jem.20190450 PMC8185651 33851955
62. Strassmann G Fong M Kenney JS Jacob CO Evidence for the involvement of interleukin 6 in experimental cancer cachexia Journal of Clinical Investigation 1992 89 5 1681 1684 10.1172/JCI115767 1569207 PMC443047 Strassmann, G., Fong, M., Kenney, J. S., & Jacob, C. O. (1992). Evidence for the involvement of interleukin 6 in experimental cancer cachexia. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 89 (5), 1681–1684. 10.1172/JCI115767 1569207 10.1172/JCI115767 PMC443047
63. Braun TP Zhu X Szumowski M Scott GD Grossberg AJ Levasseur PR Central nervous system inflammation induces muscle atrophy via activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis Journal of Experimental Medicine 2011 208 12 2449 2463 10.1084/jem.20111020 22084407 PMC3256966 Braun, T. P., Zhu, X., Szumowski, M., Scott, G. D., Grossberg, A. J., Levasseur, P. R., et al. (2011). Central nervous system inflammation induces muscle atrophy via activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 208 (12), 2449–2463. 10.1084/jem.20111020 22084407 10.1084/jem.20111020 PMC3256966
64. Cury, S. S., Freire, P. P., & Carvalho, R. F. (2025). Data-driven identification of core tumor-secreted factors associated with cachexia prevalence. Genes & Diseases , 101883, 10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101883 10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101883 PMC12828398 41584854
65. Chen JL Walton KL Winbanks CE Murphy KT Thomson RE Makanji Y Elevated expression of activins promotes muscle wasting and cachexia The FASEB Journal 2014 28 4 1711 1723 10.1096/fj.13-245894 24378873 Chen, J. L., Walton, K. L., Winbanks, C. E., Murphy, K. T., Thomson, R. E., Makanji, Y., et al. (2014). Elevated expression of activins promotes muscle wasting and cachexia. The FASEB Journal, 28 (4), 1711–1723. 10.1096/fj.13-245894 24378873 10.1096/fj.13-245894
66. Chen JL Walton KL Qian H Colgan TD Hagg A Watt MJ Differential effects of IL6 and activin A in the development of cancer-associated cachexia Cancer Research 2016 76 18 5372 5382 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-3152 27328730 Chen, J. L., Walton, K. L., Qian, H., Colgan, T. D., Hagg, A., Watt, M. J., et al. (2016). Differential effects of IL6 and activin A in the development of cancer-associated cachexia. Cancer Research, 76 (18), 5372–5382. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-3152 27328730 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-3152
67. Hu Y Liu L Chen Y Zhang X Zhou H Hu S Cancer-cell-secreted miR-204-5p induces leptin signalling pathway in white adipose tissue to promote cancer-associated cachexia Nature Communications 2023 14 1 5179 10.1038/s41467-023-40571-9 37620316 PMC10449837 Hu, Y., Liu, L., Chen, Y., Zhang, X., Zhou, H., Hu, S., et al. (2023). Cancer-cell-secreted miR-204-5p induces leptin signalling pathway in white adipose tissue to promote cancer-associated cachexia. Nature Communications, 14 (1), 5179. 10.1038/s41467-023-40571-9 37620316 10.1038/s41467-023-40571-9 PMC10449837
68. Biswas AK Acharyya S Understanding cachexia in the context of metastatic progression Nature Reviews Cancer 2020 20 5 274 284 10.1038/s41568-020-0251-4 32235902 Biswas, A. K., & Acharyya, S. (2020). Understanding cachexia in the context of metastatic progression. Nature Reviews Cancer, 20 (5), 274–284. 10.1038/s41568-020-0251-4 32235902 10.1038/s41568-020-0251-4
69. James LS Saunders AAE Karagiannis C Qian H Anderson RL Thomson RE GDF10 exacerbates metastatic burden and cachexia in murine models of cancer Frontiers in Physiology 2026 17 1773275 10.3389/fphys.2026.1773275 42111348 PMC13154152 James, L. S., Saunders, A. A. E., Karagiannis, C., Qian, H., Anderson, R. L., Thomson, R. E., et al. (2026). GDF10 exacerbates metastatic burden and cachexia in murine models of cancer. Frontiers in Physiology, 17 , 1773275. 10.3389/fphys.2026.1773275 42111348 10.3389/fphys.2026.1773275 PMC13154152
70. Soria G Ofri-Shahak M Haas I Yaal-Hahoshen N Leider-Trejo L Leibovich-Rivkin T Inflammatory mediators in breast cancer: Coordinated expression of TNFalpha & IL-1beta with CCL2 & CCL5 and effects on epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition BMC Cancer 2011 11 130 10.1186/1471-2407-11-130 21486440 PMC3095565 Soria, G., Ofri-Shahak, M., Haas, I., Yaal-Hahoshen, N., Leider-Trejo, L., Leibovich-Rivkin, T., et al. (2011). Inflammatory mediators in breast cancer: Coordinated expression of TNFalpha & IL-1beta with CCL2 & CCL5 and effects on epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. BMC Cancer, 11 , 130. 10.1186/1471-2407-11-130 21486440 10.1186/1471-2407-11-130 PMC3095565
71. Oliff A Defeo-Jones D Boyer M Martinez D Kiefer D Vuocolo G Tumors secreting human TNF/cachectin induce cachexia in mice Cell 1987 50 4 555 563 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90028-6 3607879 Oliff, A., Defeo-Jones, D., Boyer, M., Martinez, D., Kiefer, D., Vuocolo, G., et al. (1987). Tumors secreting human TNF/cachectin induce cachexia in mice. Cell, 50 (4), 555–563. 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90028-6 3607879 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90028-6
72. Fearon KC Glass DJ Guttridge DC Cancer cachexia: Mediators, signaling, and metabolic pathways Cell Metabolism 2012 16 2 153 166 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.06.011 22795476 Fearon, K. C., Glass, D. J., & Guttridge, D. C. (2012). Cancer cachexia: Mediators, signaling, and metabolic pathways. Cell Metabolism, 16 (2), 153–166. 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.06.011 22795476 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.06.011
73. Chang CJ Huang PH Chen SY Su PC Ding LY Hou YC Macrophage activation determines muscle wasting in pancreatic cancer Oncogene 2025 44 32 2797 2813 10.1038/s41388-025-03434-9 40442475 PMC12318775 Chang, C. J., Huang, P. H., Chen, S. Y., Su, P. C., Ding, L. Y., Hou, Y. C., et al. (2025). Macrophage activation determines muscle wasting in pancreatic cancer. Oncogene, 44 (32), 2797–2813. 10.1038/s41388-025-03434-9 40442475 10.1038/s41388-025-03434-9 PMC12318775
74. Manore SG Doheny DL Wong GL Lo HW IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling in breast cancer metastasis: Biology and treatment Frontiers in Oncology 2022 12 866014 10.3389/fonc.2022.866014 35371975 PMC8964978 Manore, S. G., Doheny, D. L., Wong, G. L., & Lo, H. W. (2022). IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling in breast cancer metastasis: Biology and treatment. Frontiers in Oncology, 12 , Article 866014. 10.3389/fonc.2022.866014 35371975 10.3389/fonc.2022.866014 PMC8964978
75. Bonetto A Aydogdu T Kunzevitzky N Guttridge DC Khuri S Koniaris LG STAT3 activation in skeletal muscle links muscle wasting and the acute phase response in cancer cachexia PLoS ONE 2011 6 7 e22538 10.1371/journal.pone.0022538 21799891 PMC3140523 Bonetto, A., Aydogdu, T., Kunzevitzky, N., Guttridge, D. C., Khuri, S., Koniaris, L. G., et al. (2011). STAT3 activation in skeletal muscle links muscle wasting and the acute phase response in cancer cachexia. PLoS ONE, 6 (7), Article e22538. 10.1371/journal.pone.0022538 21799891 10.1371/journal.pone.0022538 PMC3140523
76. Bonetto A Aydogdu T Jin X Zhang Z Zhan R Puzis L JAK/STAT3 pathway inhibition blocks skeletal muscle wasting downstream of IL-6 and in experimental cancer cachexia American Journal of Physiology, Endocrinology and Metabolism 2012 303 3 E410 421 10.1152/ajpendo.00039.2012 22669242 PMC3423125 Bonetto, A., Aydogdu, T., Jin, X., Zhang, Z., Zhan, R., Puzis, L., et al. (2012). JAK/STAT3 pathway inhibition blocks skeletal muscle wasting downstream of IL-6 and in experimental cancer cachexia. American Journal of Physiology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, 303 (3), E410-421. 10.1152/ajpendo.00039.2012 22669242 10.1152/ajpendo.00039.2012 PMC3423125
77. Huot, J. R., Novinger, L. J., Pin, F., & Bonetto, A. (2020). HCT116 colorectal liver metastases exacerbate muscle wasting in a mouse model for the study of colorectal cancer cachexia. Disease Models & Mechanisms, 13 (1), 10.1242/dmm.043166. 10.1242/dmm.043166 PMC6994937 31915140
78. Wang G Biswas AK Ma W Kandpal M Coker C Grandgenett PM Metastatic cancers promote cachexia through ZIP14 upregulation in skeletal muscle Nature Medicine 2018 24 6 770 781 10.1038/s41591-018-0054-2 29875463 PMC6015555 Wang, G., Biswas, A. K., Ma, W., Kandpal, M., Coker, C., Grandgenett, P. M., et al. (2018). Metastatic cancers promote cachexia through ZIP14 upregulation in skeletal muscle. Nature Medicine, 24 (6), 770–781. 10.1038/s41591-018-0054-2 29875463 10.1038/s41591-018-0054-2 PMC6015555
79. Saunders AAE Karagiannis C Du WX James LS Thomson RE Anderson RL Cachexia progression differs among mouse models of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer American Journal of Physiology, Cell Physiology 2025 10.1152/ajpcell.00230.2025 41042733 Saunders, A. A. E., Karagiannis, C., Du, W. X., James, L. S., Thomson, R. E., Anderson, R. L., et al. (2025). Cachexia progression differs among mouse models of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. American Journal of Physiology, Cell Physiology . 10.1152/ajpcell.00230.2025 41042733 10.1152/ajpcell.00230.2025
80. Murphy KT Struk A Malcontenti-Wilson C Christophi C Lynch GS Physiological characterization of a mouse model of cachexia in colorectal liver metastases American Journal of Physiology, Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 2013 304 10 R854 864 10.1152/ajpregu.00057.2013 23485871 Murphy, K. T., Struk, A., Malcontenti-Wilson, C., Christophi, C., & Lynch, G. S. (2013). Physiological characterization of a mouse model of cachexia in colorectal liver metastases. American Journal of Physiology, Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 304 (10), R854-864. 10.1152/ajpregu.00057.2013 23485871 10.1152/ajpregu.00057.2013
81 Zhang J Cai DF Hong S Prevalence and prognosis of bone metastases in common solid cancers at initial diagnosis: A population-based study Bmj Open 2023 13 10 e069908 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069908 37865405 PMC10603455 Zhang, J., Cai, D. F., & Hong, S. (2023). Prevalence and prognosis of bone metastases in common solid cancers at initial diagnosis: A population-based study. Bmj Open, 13 (10), e069908. 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069908 37865405 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069908 PMC10603455
82. Waning DL Guise TA Molecular mechanisms of bone metastasis and associated muscle weakness Clinical Cancer Research 2014 20 12 3071 3077 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1590 24677373 PMC4058425 Waning, D. L., & Guise, T. A. (2014). Molecular mechanisms of bone metastasis and associated muscle weakness. Clinical Cancer Research, 20 (12), 3071–3077. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1590 24677373 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1590 PMC4058425
83. Waning DL Guise TA Cancer-associated muscle weakness: What's bone got to do with it? BoneKEy Reports 2015 4 691 10.1038/bonekey.2015.59 25992285 PMC4432780 Waning, D. L., & Guise, T. A. (2015). Cancer-associated muscle weakness: What’s bone got to do with it? BoneKEy Reports, 4 , 691. 10.1038/bonekey.2015.59 25992285 10.1038/bonekey.2015.59 PMC4432780
84. Waning DL Mohammad KS Reiken S Xie W Andersson DC John S Excess TGF-β mediates muscle weakness associated with bone metastases in mice Nature Medicine 2015 21 11 1262 1271 10.1038/nm.3961 26457758 PMC4636436 Waning, D. L., Mohammad, K. S., Reiken, S., Xie, W., Andersson, D. C., John, S., et al. (2015). Excess TGF-β mediates muscle weakness associated with bone metastases in mice. Nature Medicine, 21 (11), 1262–1271. 10.1038/nm.3961 26457758 10.1038/nm.3961 PMC4636436
85. Haynes NM Chadwick TB Parker BS The complexity of immune evasion mechanisms throughout the metastatic cascade Nature Immunology 2024 25 10 1793 1808 10.1038/s41590-024-01960-4 39285252 Haynes, N. M., Chadwick, T. B., & Parker, B. S. (2024). The complexity of immune evasion mechanisms throughout the metastatic cascade. Nature Immunology, 25 (10), 1793–1808. 10.1038/s41590-024-01960-4 39285252 10.1038/s41590-024-01960-4
86. Tidball JG Regulation of muscle growth and regeneration by the immune system Nature Reviews Immunology 2017 17 3 165 178 10.1038/nri.2016.150 28163303 PMC5452982 Tidball, J. G. (2017). Regulation of muscle growth and regeneration by the immune system. Nature Reviews Immunology, 17 (3), 165–178. 10.1038/nri.2016.150 28163303 10.1038/nri.2016.150 PMC5452982
87. Regan JN Mikesell C Reiken S Xu H Marks AR Mohammad KS Osteolytic breast cancer causes skeletal muscle weakness in an immunocompetent syngeneic mouse model Frontiers in Endocrinology (Lausanne) 2017 8 358 10.3389/fendo.2017.00358 PMC5742151 29312148 Regan, J. N., Mikesell, C., Reiken, S., Xu, H., Marks, A. R., Mohammad, K. S., et al. (2017). Osteolytic breast cancer causes skeletal muscle weakness in an immunocompetent syngeneic mouse model. Frontiers in Endocrinology (Lausanne), 8 , 358. 10.3389/fendo.2017.00358 10.3389/fendo.2017.00358 PMC5742151 29312148
88. Soni S Torvund M Mandal CC Molecular insights into the interplay between adiposity, breast cancer and bone metastasis Clinical & Experimental Metastasis 2021 38 2 119 138 10.1007/s10585-021-10076-0 33591548 Soni, S., Torvund, M., & Mandal, C. C. (2021). Molecular insights into the interplay between adiposity, breast cancer and bone metastasis. Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, 38 (2), 119–138. 10.1007/s10585-021-10076-0 33591548 10.1007/s10585-021-10076-0
89. Imoto A Mitsunaga S Inagaki M Aoyagi K Sasaki H Ikeda M Neural invasion induces cachexia via astrocytic activation of neural route in pancreatic cancer International Journal of Cancer 2012 131 12 2795 2807 10.1002/ijc.27594 22511317 Imoto, A., Mitsunaga, S., Inagaki, M., Aoyagi, K., Sasaki, H., Ikeda, M., et al. (2012). Neural invasion induces cachexia via astrocytic activation of neural route in pancreatic cancer. International Journal of Cancer, 131 (12), 2795–2807. 10.1002/ijc.27594 22511317 10.1002/ijc.27594
90. Gutierrez-Leal I Caballero-Hernandez D Orozco-Flores AA Gomez-Flores R Quistian-Martinez D Tamez-Guerra P Role of the sympathetic nervous system in cancer-associated cachexia and tumor progression in tumor-bearing BALB/c mice BMC Neuroscience 2024 25 1 37 10.1186/s12868-024-00887-8 39174899 PMC11342617 Gutierrez-Leal, I., Caballero-Hernandez, D., Orozco-Flores, A. A., Gomez-Flores, R., Quistian-Martinez, D., Tamez-Guerra, P., et al. (2024). Role of the sympathetic nervous system in cancer-associated cachexia and tumor progression in tumor-bearing BALB/c mice. BMC Neuroscience, 25 (1), Article 37. 10.1186/s12868-024-00887-8 39174899 10.1186/s12868-024-00887-8 PMC11342617
91. Zahalka AH Frenette PS Nerves in cancer Nature Reviews Cancer 2020 20 3 143 157 10.1038/s41568-019-0237-2 31974491 PMC7709871 Zahalka, A. H., & Frenette, P. S. (2020). Nerves in cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer, 20 (3), 143–157. 10.1038/s41568-019-0237-2 31974491 10.1038/s41568-019-0237-2 PMC7709871
92. Huang D Su S Cui X Shen X Zeng Y Wu W Nerve fibers in breast cancer tissues indicate aggressive tumor progression Medicine (Baltimore) 2014 93 27 e172 10.1097/MD.0000000000000172 25501061 PMC4602796 Huang, D., Su, S., Cui, X., Shen, X., Zeng, Y., Wu, W., et al. (2014). Nerve fibers in breast cancer tissues indicate aggressive tumor progression. Medicine (Baltimore), 93 (27), Article e172. 10.1097/MD.0000000000000172 25501061 10.1097/MD.0000000000000172 PMC4602796
93. Sloan EK Priceman SJ Cox BF Yu S Pimentel MA Tangkanangnukul V The sympathetic nervous system induces a metastatic switch in primary breast cancer Cancer Research 2010 70 18 7042 7052 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0522 20823155 PMC2940980 Sloan, E. K., Priceman, S. J., Cox, B. F., Yu, S., Pimentel, M. A., Tangkanangnukul, V., et al. (2010). The sympathetic nervous system induces a metastatic switch in primary breast cancer. Cancer Research, 70 (18), 7042–7052. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0522 20823155 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0522 PMC2940980
94. Chang A Botteri E Gillis RD Lofling L Le CP Ziegler AI Beta-blockade enhances anthracycline control of metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer Science Translational Medicine 2023 15 693 eadf1147 10.1126/scitranslmed.adf1147 37099632 Chang, A., Botteri, E., Gillis, R. D., Lofling, L., Le, C. P., Ziegler, A. I., et al. (2023). Beta-blockade enhances anthracycline control of metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer. Science Translational Medicine, 15 (693), Article eadf1147. 10.1126/scitranslmed.adf1147 37099632 10.1126/scitranslmed.adf1147
95. Sloan EK Chang A Wired to spread: Neural regulation of metastasis Neuron 2025 113 17 2726 2728 10.1016/j.neuron.2025.07.009 40907469 Sloan, E. K., & Chang, A. (2025). Wired to spread: Neural regulation of metastasis. Neuron, 113 (17), 2726–2728. 10.1016/j.neuron.2025.07.009 40907469 10.1016/j.neuron.2025.07.009
96. Smith KL Tisdale MJ Increased protein degradation and decreased protein synthesis in skeletal muscle during cancer cachexia British Journal of Cancer 1993 67 4 680 685 10.1038/bjc.1993.126 8471425 PMC1968351 Smith, K. L., & Tisdale, M. J. (1993). Increased protein degradation and decreased protein synthesis in skeletal muscle during cancer cachexia. British Journal of Cancer, 67 (4), 680–685. 10.1038/bjc.1993.126 8471425 10.1038/bjc.1993.126 PMC1968351
97. Geremia A Sartori R Baraldo M Nogara L Balmaceda V Dumitras GA Activation of Akt-mTORC1 signalling reverts cancer-dependent muscle wasting Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 2022 13 1 648 661 10.1002/jcsm.12854 34741441 PMC8818597 Geremia, A., Sartori, R., Baraldo, M., Nogara, L., Balmaceda, V., Dumitras, G. A., et al. (2022). Activation of Akt-mTORC1 signalling reverts cancer-dependent muscle wasting. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 13 (1), 648–661. 10.1002/jcsm.12854 34741441 10.1002/jcsm.12854 PMC8818597
98. Yamada T Ashida Y Tatebayashi D Abe M Himori K Cancer cachexia induces preferential skeletal muscle myosin loss when combined with denervation Frontiers in Physiology 2020 11 445 10.3389/fphys.2020.00445 32425814 PMC7212425 Yamada, T., Ashida, Y., Tatebayashi, D., Abe, M., & Himori, K. (2020). Cancer cachexia induces preferential skeletal muscle myosin loss when combined with denervation. Frontiers in Physiology, 11 , 445. 10.3389/fphys.2020.00445 32425814 10.3389/fphys.2020.00445 PMC7212425
99. White JP Puppa MJ Gao S Sato S Welle SL Carson JA Muscle mTORC1 suppression by IL-6 during cancer cachexia: A role for AMPK American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism 2013 304 10 E1042 1052 10.1152/ajpendo.00410.2012 23531613 PMC3651620 White, J. P., Puppa, M. J., Gao, S., Sato, S., Welle, S. L., & Carson, J. A. (2013). Muscle mTORC1 suppression by IL-6 during cancer cachexia: A role for AMPK. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism, 304 (10), E1042-1052. 10.1152/ajpendo.00410.2012 23531613 10.1152/ajpendo.00410.2012 PMC3651620
100. Acharyya S Ladner KJ Nelsen LL Damrauer J Reiser PJ Swoap S Cancer cachexia is regulated by selective targeting of skeletal muscle gene products Journal of Clinical Investigation 2004 114 3 370 378 10.1172/jci200420174 15286803 PMC484974 Acharyya, S., Ladner, K. J., Nelsen, L. L., Damrauer, J., Reiser, P. J., Swoap, S., et al. (2004). Cancer cachexia is regulated by selective targeting of skeletal muscle gene products. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 114 (3), 370–378. 10.1172/jci200420174 15286803 10.1172/JCI20174 PMC484974
101. Hughes DC Goodman CA Baehr LM Gregorevic P Bodine SC A critical discussion on the relationship between E3 ubiquitin ligases, protein degradation, and skeletal muscle wasting: It's not that simple American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology 2023 325 6 C1567 C1582 10.1152/ajpcell.00457.2023 37955121 PMC10861180 Hughes, D. C., Goodman, C. A., Baehr, L. M., Gregorevic, P., & Bodine, S. C. (2023). A critical discussion on the relationship between E3 ubiquitin ligases, protein degradation, and skeletal muscle wasting: It’s not that simple. American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology, 325 (6), C1567–C1582. 10.1152/ajpcell.00457.2023 37955121 10.1152/ajpcell.00457.2023 PMC10861180
102. Alissa N Fang WB Medrano M Bergeron N Kozai Y Hu Q CCL2 signaling promotes skeletal muscle wasting in non-tumor and breast tumor models Disease Models & Mechanisms 2024 10.1242/dmm.050398 PMC11413935 38973385 Alissa, N., Fang, W. B., Medrano, M., Bergeron, N., Kozai, Y., Hu, Q., et al. (2024). CCL2 signaling promotes skeletal muscle wasting in non-tumor and breast tumor models. Disease Models & Mechanisms . 10.1242/dmm.050398 10.1242/dmm.050398 PMC11413935 38973385
103. Shakri AR James Zhong T Ma W Coker C Hegde R Scholze H Aberrant Zip14 expression in muscle is associated with cachexia in a Bard1-deficient mouse model of breast cancer metastasis Cancer Medicine 2020 9 18 6766 6775 10.1002/cam4.3242 32730698 PMC7520359 Shakri, A. R., James Zhong, T., Ma, W., Coker, C., Hegde, R., Scholze, H., et al. (2020). Aberrant Zip14 expression in muscle is associated with cachexia in a Bard1-deficient mouse model of breast cancer metastasis. Cancer Medicine, 9 (18), 6766–6775. 10.1002/cam4.3242 32730698 10.1002/cam4.3242 PMC7520359
104. Wilcox-Hagerty J Xu H Hain BA Arnold AC Waning DL Bone metastases induce metabolic changes and mitophagy in mice Experimental Physiology 2021 106 2 506 518 10.1113/EP089130 33369797 PMC7855482 Wilcox-Hagerty, J., Xu, H., Hain, B. A., Arnold, A. C., & Waning, D. L. (2021). Bone metastases induce metabolic changes and mitophagy in mice. Experimental Physiology, 106 (2), 506–518. 10.1113/EP089130 33369797 10.1113/EP089130 PMC7855482
105. Zhang Y Wang J Wang X Gao T Tian H Zhou D The autophagic-lysosomal and ubiquitin proteasome systems are simultaneously activated in the skeletal muscle of gastric cancer patients with cachexia American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2020 111 3 570 579 10.1093/ajcn/nqz347 31968072 Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Wang, X., Gao, T., Tian, H., Zhou, D., et al. (2020). The autophagic-lysosomal and ubiquitin proteasome systems are simultaneously activated in the skeletal muscle of gastric cancer patients with cachexia. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 111 (3), 570–579. 10.1093/ajcn/nqz347 31968072 10.1093/ajcn/nqz347
106. Ali MS Bitsch-Olsen S Frank E Themsen SSB Battey E Perla M Breast cancer cell-conditioned media inhibit growth and reduce basal and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake by inhibiting Rac1 activation in rat myotubes Journal of Physiology-London 2025 10.1113/Jp288099 41042902 Ali, M. S., Bitsch-Olsen, S., Frank, E., Themsen, S. S. B., Battey, E., Perla, M., et al. (2025). Breast cancer cell-conditioned media inhibit growth and reduce basal and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake by inhibiting Rac1 activation in rat myotubes. Journal of Physiology-London . 10.1113/Jp288099 10.1113/JP288099 41042902
107. Ru Q Li Y Zhang X Chen L Wu Y Min J Iron homeostasis and ferroptosis in muscle diseases and disorders: Mechanisms and therapeutic prospects Bone Res 2025 13 1 27 10.1038/s41413-024-00398-6 40000618 PMC11861620 Ru, Q., Li, Y., Zhang, X., Chen, L., Wu, Y., Min, J., et al. (2025). Iron homeostasis and ferroptosis in muscle diseases and disorders: Mechanisms and therapeutic prospects. Bone Res, 13 (1), 27. 10.1038/s41413-024-00398-6 40000618 10.1038/s41413-024-00398-6 PMC11861620
108. Neyroud D D'Lugos AC Trevino EJ Callaway CS Lamm J Laitano O Local inflammation precedes diaphragm wasting and fibrotic remodelling in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 2025 16 1 e13668 10.1002/jcsm.13668 39810606 PMC11733308 Neyroud, D., D’Lugos, A. C., Trevino, E. J., Callaway, C. S., Lamm, J., Laitano, O., et al. (2025). Local inflammation precedes diaphragm wasting and fibrotic remodelling in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 16 (1), Article e13668. 10.1002/jcsm.13668 39810606 10.1002/jcsm.13668 PMC11733308
109. Cardaci TD Bastian AV Roark K Bullard BM NeSmith MM Unger CA Profibrotic immune cells and fibro-adipogenic progenitors contribute to skeletal muscle extracellular matrix remodeling and fibrosis in cancer cachexia American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology 2025 329 4 C1283 C1299 10.1152/ajpcell.00448.2025 40929182 PMC12516515 Cardaci, T. D., Bastian, A. V., Roark, K., Bullard, B. M., NeSmith, M. M., Unger, C. A., et al. (2025). Profibrotic immune cells and fibro-adipogenic progenitors contribute to skeletal muscle extracellular matrix remodeling and fibrosis in cancer cachexia. American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology, 329 (4), C1283–C1299. 10.1152/ajpcell.00448.2025 40929182 10.1152/ajpcell.00448.2025 PMC12516515
110. Pryce BR Oles A Talbert EE Romeo MJ Vaena S Sharma S Muscle inflammation is regulated by NF-κB from multiple cells to control distinct states of wasting in cancer cachexia Cell Reports 2024 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114925 39475511 PMC11774514 Pryce, B. R., Oles, A., Talbert, E. E., Romeo, M. J., Vaena, S., Sharma, S., et al. (2024). Muscle inflammation is regulated by NF-κB from multiple cells to control distinct states of wasting in cancer cachexia. Cell Reports . 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114925 39475511 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114925 PMC11774514
111. Petruzzelli M Ferrer M Schuijs MJ Kleeman SO Mourikis N Hall Z Early neutrophilia marked by aerobic glycolysis sustains host metabolism and delays cancer cachexia Cancers 2022 14 4 963 10.3390/cancers14040963 35205709 PMC8870098 Petruzzelli, M., Ferrer, M., Schuijs, M. J., Kleeman, S. O., Mourikis, N., Hall, Z., et al. (2022). Early neutrophilia marked by aerobic glycolysis sustains host metabolism and delays cancer cachexia. Cancers, 14 (4), 963. 10.3390/cancers14040963 35205709 10.3390/cancers14040963 PMC8870098
112. Hayashi Y Kamimura-Aoyagi Y Nishikawa S Noka R Iwata R Iwabuchi A IL36G-producing neutrophil-like monocytes promote cachexia in cancer Nature Communications 2024 15 1 7662 10.1038/s41467-024-51873-x 39266531 PMC11393454 Hayashi, Y., Kamimura-Aoyagi, Y., Nishikawa, S., Noka, R., Iwata, R., Iwabuchi, A., et al. (2024). IL36G-producing neutrophil-like monocytes promote cachexia in cancer. Nature Communications, 15 (1), 7662. 10.1038/s41467-024-51873-x 39266531 10.1038/s41467-024-51873-x PMC11393454
113. Swierczak, A., Cook, A. D., Lenzo, J. C., Restall, C. M., Doherty, J. P., Anderson, R. L., et al. (2014). The promotion of breast cancer metastasis caused by inhibition of CSF-1R/CSF-1 signaling is blocked by targeting the G-CSF receptor. Cancer Immunology Research, 2 (8), 765–776. 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0190 25005824
114. Barker T Fulde G Moulton B Nadauld LD Rhodes T An elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio associates with weight loss and cachexia in cancer Scientific Reports 2020 10 1 7535 10.1038/s41598-020-64282-z 32371869 PMC7200806 Barker, T., Fulde, G., Moulton, B., Nadauld, L. D., & Rhodes, T. (2020). An elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio associates with weight loss and cachexia in cancer. Scientific Reports, 10 (1), Article 7535. 10.1038/s41598-020-64282-z 32371869 10.1038/s41598-020-64282-z PMC7200806
115. Zhang KL Zhou MM Wang KH Weng M Zhou FX Cui JW Integrated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and handgrip strength better predict survival in patients with cancer cachexia Nutrition 2024 122 112399 10.1016/j.nut.2024.112399 38493542 Zhang, K. L., Zhou, M. M., Wang, K. H., Weng, M., Zhou, F. X., Cui, J. W., et al. (2024). Integrated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and handgrip strength better predict survival in patients with cancer cachexia. Nutrition, 122 , Article 112399. 10.1016/j.nut.2024.112399 38493542 10.1016/j.nut.2024.112399
116. Deyhle MR Callaway CS Neyroud D D’Lugos AC Judge SM Judge AR Depleting Ly6G positive myeloid cells reduces pancreatic cancer-induced skeletal muscle atrophy Cells 2022 11 12 1893 10.3390/cells11121893 35741022 PMC9221479 Deyhle, M. R., Callaway, C. S., Neyroud, D., D’Lugos, A. C., Judge, S. M., & Judge, A. R. (2022). Depleting Ly6G positive myeloid cells reduces pancreatic cancer-induced skeletal muscle atrophy. Cells, 11 (12), Article 1893. 10.3390/cells11121893 35741022 10.3390/cells11121893 PMC9221479
117. Shukla SK Markov SD Attri KS Vernucci E King RJ Dasgupta A Macrophages potentiate STAT3 signaling in skeletal muscles and regulate pancreatic cancer cachexia Cancer Letters 2020 484 29 39 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.04.017 32344015 PMC7286478 Shukla, S. K., Markov, S. D., Attri, K. S., Vernucci, E., King, R. J., Dasgupta, A., et al. (2020). Macrophages potentiate STAT3 signaling in skeletal muscles and regulate pancreatic cancer cachexia. Cancer Letters, 484 , 29–39. 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.04.017 32344015 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.04.017 PMC7286478
118. Sartori, R., Hagg, A., Zampieri, S., Armani, A., Winbanks, C. E., Viana, L. R., et al. (2021). Perturbed BMP signaling and denervation promote muscle wasting in cancer cachexia. Science Translational Medicine, 13 (605), 10.1126/scitranslmed.aay9592 10.1126/scitranslmed.aay9592 34349036
119. Zhang, Y., Dos Santos, M., Huang, H., Chen, K., Iyengar, P., Infante, R., et al. (2024). A molecular pathway for cancer cachexia-induced muscle atrophy revealed at single-nucleus resolution. Cell Reports, 43 (8), 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114587 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114587 PMC11472345 39116208
120. Huot JR Pin F Bonetto A Muscle weakness caused by cancer and chemotherapy is associated with loss of motor unit connectivity (vol 11, pg 2990, 2021) American Journal of Cancer Research 2022 12 3 1339 1339 PMC8263661 34249440 Huot, J. R., Pin, F., & Bonetto, A. (2022). Muscle weakness caused by cancer and chemotherapy is associated with loss of motor unit connectivity (vol 11, pg 2990, 2021). American Journal of Cancer Research, 12 (3), 1339–1339. PMC8263661 34249440
121. Campelj, D. G., Goodman, C. A., & Rybalka, E. (2021). Chemotherapy-induced myopathy: the dark side of the cachexia sphere. Cancers (Basel), 13 (14), 10.3390/cancers13143615 10.3390/cancers13143615 PMC8304349 34298829
122. Coletti D Chemotherapy-induced muscle wasting: An update European Journal of Translational Myology 2018 28 2 7587 10.4081/ejtm.2018.7587 29991991 PMC6036312 Coletti, D. (2018). Chemotherapy-induced muscle wasting: An update. European Journal of Translational Myology, 28 (2), 7587. 10.4081/ejtm.2018.7587 29991991 10.4081/ejtm.2018.7587 PMC6036312
123. Gilliam LA Moylan JS Patterson EW Smith JD Wilson AS Rabbani Z Doxorubicin acts via mitochondrial ROS to stimulate catabolism in C2C12 myotubes American Journal of Physiology, Cell Physiology 2012 302 1 C195 202 10.1152/ajpcell.00217.2011 21940668 PMC3328915 Gilliam, L. A., Moylan, J. S., Patterson, E. W., Smith, J. D., Wilson, A. S., Rabbani, Z., et al. (2012). Doxorubicin acts via mitochondrial ROS to stimulate catabolism in C2C12 myotubes. American Journal of Physiology, Cell Physiology, 302 (1), C195-202. 10.1152/ajpcell.00217.2011 21940668 10.1152/ajpcell.00217.2011 PMC3328915
124. Morton AB Mor Huertas A Hinkley JM Ichinoseki-Sekine N Christou DD Smuder AJ Mitochondrial accumulation of doxorubicin in cardiac and diaphragm muscle following exercise preconditioning Mitochondrion 2019 45 52 62 10.1016/j.mito.2018.02.005 29474837 PMC6103903 Morton, A. B., Mor Huertas, A., Hinkley, J. M., Ichinoseki-Sekine, N., Christou, D. D., & Smuder, A. J. (2019). Mitochondrial accumulation of doxorubicin in cardiac and diaphragm muscle following exercise preconditioning. Mitochondrion, 45 , 52–62. 10.1016/j.mito.2018.02.005 29474837 10.1016/j.mito.2018.02.005 PMC6103903
125. Hulmi JJ Nissinen TA Räsänen M Degerman J Lautaoja JH Hemanthakumar KA Prevention of chemotherapy-induced cachexia by ACVR2B ligand blocking has different effects on heart and skeletal muscle Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 2018 9 2 417 432 10.1002/jcsm.12265 29230965 PMC5879968 Hulmi, J. J., Nissinen, T. A., Räsänen, M., Degerman, J., Lautaoja, J. H., Hemanthakumar, K. A., et al. (2018). Prevention of chemotherapy-induced cachexia by ACVR2B ligand blocking has different effects on heart and skeletal muscle. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 9 (2), 417–432. 10.1002/jcsm.12265 29230965 10.1002/jcsm.12265 PMC5879968
126. Murphy, K. T., Swiderski, K., Ryall, J. G., Davey, J. R., Qian, H., Lamon, S., et al. (2022). Mechanisms of chemotherapy‐induced muscle wasting in mice with cancer cachexia. JCSM Rapid Communications, 5 (1), 102–116.
127. Boyer JG Prasad V Song T Lee D Fu X Grimes KM ERK1/2 signaling induces skeletal muscle slow fiber-type switching and reduces muscular dystrophy disease severity JCI Insight 2019 10.1172/jci.insight.127356 30964448 PMC6542606 Boyer, J. G., Prasad, V., Song, T., Lee, D., Fu, X., Grimes, K. M., et al. (2019). ERK1/2 signaling induces skeletal muscle slow fiber-type switching and reduces muscular dystrophy disease severity. JCI Insight . 10.1172/jci.insight.127356 30964448 10.1172/jci.insight.127356 PMC6542606
128. Hardee JP Martins KJB Miotto PM Ryall JG Gehrig SM Reljic B Metabolic remodeling of dystrophic skeletal muscle reveals biological roles for dystrophin and utrophin in adaptation and plasticity Molecular Metabolism 2021 45 101157 10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101157 33359740 PMC7811171 Hardee, J. P., Martins, K. J. B., Miotto, P. M., Ryall, J. G., Gehrig, S. M., Reljic, B., et al. (2021). Metabolic remodeling of dystrophic skeletal muscle reveals biological roles for dystrophin and utrophin in adaptation and plasticity. Molecular Metabolism, 45 , Article 101157. 10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101157 33359740 10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101157 PMC7811171
129. Pin F Barreto R Couch ME Bonetto A O'Connell TM Cachexia induced by cancer and chemotherapy yield distinct perturbations to energy metabolism Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 2019 10 1 140 154 10.1002/jcsm.12360 30680954 PMC6438345 Pin, F., Barreto, R., Couch, M. E., Bonetto, A., & O’Connell, T. M. (2019). Cachexia induced by cancer and chemotherapy yield distinct perturbations to energy metabolism. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 10 (1), 140–154. 10.1002/jcsm.12360 30680954 10.1002/jcsm.12360 PMC6438345
130. Braun, T. P., Szumowski, M., Levasseur, P. R., Grossberg, A. J., Zhu, X. X., Agarwal, A., et al. (2014). Muscle atrophy in response to cytotoxic chemotherapy is dependent on intact glucocorticoid signaling in skeletal muscle. PLoS One, 9 (9), 10.1371/journal.pone.0106489 10.1371/journal.pone.0106489 PMC4177815 25254959
131. Hain BA Xu H Wilcox JR Mutua D Waning DL Chemotherapy-induced loss of bone and muscle mass in a mouse model of breast cancer bone metastases and cachexia JCSM Rapid Communications 2019 2 1 1 12 10.1113/EP089130 PMC6481302 31032492 Hain, B. A., Xu, H., Wilcox, J. R., Mutua, D., & Waning, D. L. (2019). Chemotherapy-induced loss of bone and muscle mass in a mouse model of breast cancer bone metastases and cachexia. JCSM Rapid Communications, 2 (1), 1–12. 10.1113/EP089130 PMC6481302 31032492
132. Wright LE Harhash AA Kozlow WM Waning DL Regan JN She Y Aromatase inhibitor-induced bone loss increases the progression of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer in bone and exacerbates muscle weakness in vivo Oncotarget 2016 8 5 8406 10.18632/oncotarget.14139 PMC5352410 28039445 Wright, L. E., Harhash, A. A., Kozlow, W. M., Waning, D. L., Regan, J. N., She, Y., et al. (2016). Aromatase inhibitor-induced bone loss increases the progression of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer in bone and exacerbates muscle weakness in vivo. Oncotarget, 8 (5), 8406. 10.18632/oncotarget.14139 10.18632/oncotarget.14139 PMC5352410 28039445
133. Sun X Zhang J Gupta R Macgibbon AK Kuhn-Sherlock B Krissansen GW Dairy milk fat augments paclitaxel therapy to suppress tumour metastasis in mice, and protects against the side-effects of chemotherapy Clinical & Experimental Metastasis 2011 28 7 675 688 10.1007/s10585-011-9400-1 21739249 Sun, X., Zhang, J., Gupta, R., Macgibbon, A. K., Kuhn-Sherlock, B., & Krissansen, G. W. (2011). Dairy milk fat augments paclitaxel therapy to suppress tumour metastasis in mice, and protects against the side-effects of chemotherapy. Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, 28 (7), 675–688. 10.1007/s10585-011-9400-1 21739249 10.1007/s10585-011-9400-1
134. Coa KI Epstein JB Ettinger D Jatoi A McManus K Platek ME The impact of cancer treatment on the diets and food preferences of patients receiving outpatient treatment Nutrition and Cancer 2015 67 2 339 353 10.1080/01635581.2015.990577 25664980 PMC4353259 Coa, K. I., Epstein, J. B., Ettinger, D., Jatoi, A., McManus, K., Platek, M. E., et al. (2015). The impact of cancer treatment on the diets and food preferences of patients receiving outpatient treatment. Nutrition and Cancer, 67 (2), 339–353. 10.1080/01635581.2015.990577 25664980 10.1080/01635581.2015.990577 PMC4353259
135. Schaeffers, A. W., Scholten, H. A., Kok, A., Reinders, F. C., Stellato, R. K., Smid, E. J., et al. (2025). Change of skeletal muscle mass and associated factors during radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncology Reports, 14 , Article 100737.
136. Li G Jiang XY Qiu B Shen LJ Chen C Xia YF Vicious circle of acute radiation toxicities and weight loss predicts poor prognosis for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients receiving intensity modulated radiotherapy Journal of Cancer 2017 8 5 832 838 10.7150/jca.17458 28382146 PMC5381172 Li, G., Jiang, X. Y., Qiu, B., Shen, L. J., Chen, C., & Xia, Y. F. (2017). Vicious circle of acute radiation toxicities and weight loss predicts poor prognosis for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients receiving intensity modulated radiotherapy. Journal of Cancer, 8 (5), 832–838. 10.7150/jca.17458 28382146 10.7150/jca.17458 PMC5381172
137. Powrozek, T., Dziwota, J., & Malecka-Massalska, T. (2021). Nutritional deficiencies in radiotherapy-treated head and neck cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10 (4), 10.3390/jcm10040574 10.3390/jcm10040574 PMC7913750 33546506
138. Lamport, A. E., Takayesu, J. S. K., Lipps, D. B., & Wolfram, S. (2025). A case-control study of pectoralis major muscle quality in breast cancer survivors after radiation therapy without prior axillary lymph node dissection. Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism, 50 , 10.1139/apnm-2025-0058 10.1139/apnm-2025-0058 40953482
139. Wallner C Drysch M Hahn SA Becerikli M Puscz F Wagner JM Alterations in pectoralis muscle cell characteristics after radiation of the human breast in situ Journal of Radiation Research 2019 60 6 825 830 10.1093/jrr/rrz067 31665379 PMC7357228 Wallner, C., Drysch, M., Hahn, S. A., Becerikli, M., Puscz, F., Wagner, J. M., et al. (2019). Alterations in pectoralis muscle cell characteristics after radiation of the human breast in situ . Journal of Radiation Research, 60 (6), 825–830. 10.1093/jrr/rrz067 31665379 10.1093/jrr/rrz067 PMC7357228
140. Seki M Uruha A Ohnuki Y Kamada S Noda T Onda A Inflammatory myopathy associated with PD-1 inhibitors Journal of Autoimmunity 2019 100 105 113 10.1016/j.jaut.2019.03.005 30862448 Seki, M., Uruha, A., Ohnuki, Y., Kamada, S., Noda, T., Onda, A., et al. (2019). Inflammatory myopathy associated with PD-1 inhibitors. Journal of Autoimmunity, 100 , 105–113. 10.1016/j.jaut.2019.03.005 30862448 10.1016/j.jaut.2019.03.005
141. O'Hare M Guidon AC Peripheral nervous system immune-related adverse events due to checkpoint inhibition Nature Reviews Neurology 2024 20 9 509 525 10.1038/s41582-024-01001-6 39122934 O’Hare, M., & Guidon, A. C. (2024). Peripheral nervous system immune-related adverse events due to checkpoint inhibition. Nature Reviews Neurology, 20 (9), 509–525. 10.1038/s41582-024-01001-6 39122934 10.1038/s41582-024-01001-6
142. Kao JC Brickshawana A Liewluck T Neuromuscular complications of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 2018 18 10 63 10.1007/s11910-018-0878-7 30078154 Kao, J. C., Brickshawana, A., & Liewluck, T. (2018). Neuromuscular complications of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 18 (10), 63. 10.1007/s11910-018-0878-7 30078154 10.1007/s11910-018-0878-7
143. Vitale E Rizzo A Maistrello L Cauli O Mollica V Marques Monteiro FS Decreased appetite in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs): The MOUSEION-012 systematic review and meta-analysis Clinical Nutrition ESPEN 2025 70 591 603 10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.10.031 41197773 Vitale, E., Rizzo, A., Maistrello, L., Cauli, O., Mollica, V., Marques Monteiro, F. S., et al. (2025). Decreased appetite in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs): The MOUSEION-012 systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 70 , 591–603. 10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.10.031 41197773 10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.10.031
144. Tomasin R Martin A Cominetti MR Metastasis and cachexia: Alongside in clinics, but not so in animal models Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 2019 10 6 1183 1194 10.1002/jcsm.12475 31436396 PMC6903449 Tomasin, R., Martin, A., & Cominetti, M. R. (2019). Metastasis and cachexia: Alongside in clinics, but not so in animal models. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 10 (6), 1183–1194. 10.1002/jcsm.12475 31436396 10.1002/jcsm.12475 PMC6903449
145. Lim, P., Woo, S. W., Han, J., Lee, Y. L., Lim, J. J., Kang, Y. H., et al. (2025). Alpha-ketoisocaproate attenuates muscle atrophy in cancer cachexia models. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 16 (4), 10.1002/jcsm.70044 10.1002/jcsm.70044 PMC12351804 40810552
146. Shamsi MM Chekachak S Soudi S Quinn L Ranjbar K Chenari J Combined effect of aerobic interval training and selenium nanoparticles on expression of IL-15 and IL-10/TNF-α ratio in skeletal muscle of 4T1 breast cancer mice with cachexia Cytokine 2017 90 100 108 10.1016/j.cyto.2016.11.005 27863332 Shamsi, M. M., Chekachak, S., Soudi, S., Quinn, L., Ranjbar, K., Chenari, J., et al. (2017). Combined effect of aerobic interval training and selenium nanoparticles on expression of IL-15 and IL-10/TNF-α ratio in skeletal muscle of 4T1 breast cancer mice with cachexia. Cytokine, 90 , 100–108. 10.1016/j.cyto.2016.11.005 27863332 10.1016/j.cyto.2016.11.005
147. Zhang J Zheng J Chen H Li X Ye C Zhang F Curcumin targeting NF-κB/ubiquitin-proteasome-system axis ameliorates muscle atrophy in triple-negative breast cancer cachexia mice Mediators of Inflammation 2022 2022 1 2567150 10.1155/2022/2567150 35132306 PMC8817892 Zhang, J., Zheng, J., Chen, H., Li, X., Ye, C., Zhang, F., et al. (2022). Curcumin targeting NF-κB/ubiquitin-proteasome-system axis ameliorates muscle atrophy in triple-negative breast cancer cachexia mice. Mediators of Inflammation, 2022 (1), 2567150. 10.1155/2022/2567150 35132306 10.1155/2022/2567150 PMC8817892
148. Martinelli G Olivari D Re Cecconi A Talamini L Ottoboni L Lecker S Activation of the SDF1/CXCR4 pathway retards muscle atrophy during cancer cachexia Oncogene 2016 35 48 6212 6222 10.1038/onc.2016.153 27212031 Martinelli, G., Olivari, D., Re Cecconi, A., Talamini, L., Ottoboni, L., Lecker, S., et al. (2016). Activation of the SDF1/CXCR4 pathway retards muscle atrophy during cancer cachexia. Oncogene, 35 (48), 6212–6222. 10.1038/onc.2016.153 27212031 10.1038/onc.2016.153
149. Wang R Bhat-Nakshatri P Padua MB Prasad MS Anjanappa M Jacobson M Pharmacological dual inhibition of tumor and tumor-induced functional limitations in a transgenic model of breast cancer Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 2017 16 12 2747 2758 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0717 28978719 PMC5716864 Wang, R., Bhat-Nakshatri, P., Padua, M. B., Prasad, M. S., Anjanappa, M., Jacobson, M., et al. (2017). Pharmacological dual inhibition of tumor and tumor-induced functional limitations in a transgenic model of breast cancer. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, 16 (12), 2747–2758. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0717 28978719 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0717 PMC5716864
150. Wang R Kumar B Bhat-Nakshatri P Prasad MS Jacobsen MH Ovalle G Aging-associated skeletal muscle defects in HER2/Neu transgenic mammary tumor model JCSM Rapid Communications 2021 4 1 24 39 10.1002/rco2.23 33842876 PMC8028024 Wang, R., Kumar, B., Bhat-Nakshatri, P., Prasad, M. S., Jacobsen, M. H., Ovalle, G., et al. (2021). Aging-associated skeletal muscle defects in HER2/Neu transgenic mammary tumor model. JCSM Rapid Communications, 4 (1), 24–39. 10.1002/rco2.23 33842876 10.1002/rco2.23 PMC8028024
151. Morena F Cabrera AR Greene NP Exploring heterogeneity: A dive into preclinical models of cancer cachexia American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology 2024 327 2 C310 C328 10.1152/ajpcell.00317.2024 38853648 PMC11427020 Morena, F., Cabrera, A. R., & Greene, N. P. (2024). Exploring heterogeneity: A dive into preclinical models of cancer cachexia. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, 327 (2), C310–C328. 10.1152/ajpcell.00317.2024 38853648 10.1152/ajpcell.00317.2024 PMC11427020
152. Saunders AAE Thomson RE Goodman CA Anderson RL Gregorevic P Striated muscle: An inadequate soil for cancers Cancer and Metastasis Reviews 2024 43 4 1511 1527 10.1007/s10555-024-10199-2 38995522 PMC11554797 Saunders, A. A. E., Thomson, R. E., Goodman, C. A., Anderson, R. L., & Gregorevic, P. (2024). Striated muscle: An inadequate soil for cancers. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, 43 (4), 1511–1527. 10.1007/s10555-024-10199-2 38995522 10.1007/s10555-024-10199-2 PMC11554797
153. Giacobbe A Abate-Shen C Modeling metastasis in mice: A closer look Trends in Cancer 2021 7 10 916 929 10.1016/j.trecan.2021.06.010 34303648 PMC8906831 Giacobbe, A., & Abate-Shen, C. (2021). Modeling metastasis in mice: A closer look. Trends in Cancer, 7 (10), 916–929. 10.1016/j.trecan.2021.06.010 34303648 10.1016/j.trecan.2021.06.010 PMC8906831
154. Riccardi F Dal Bo M Macor P Toffoli G A comprehensive overview on antibody-drug conjugates: From the conceptualization to cancer therapy Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023 14 1274088 10.3389/fphar.2023.1274088 37790810 PMC10544916 Riccardi, F., Dal Bo, M., Macor, P., & Toffoli, G. (2023). A comprehensive overview on antibody-drug conjugates: From the conceptualization to cancer therapy. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 14 , Article 1274088. 10.3389/fphar.2023.1274088 37790810 10.3389/fphar.2023.1274088 PMC10544916
155. Nguyen TD Bordeau BM Balthasar JP Mechanisms of ADC toxicity and strategies to increase ADC tolerability Cancers 2023 10.3390/cancers15030713 36765668 PMC9913659 Nguyen, T. D., Bordeau, B. M., & Balthasar, J. P. (2023). Mechanisms of ADC toxicity and strategies to increase ADC tolerability. Cancers . 10.3390/cancers15030713 36765668 10.3390/cancers15030713 PMC9913659
156. Zhang J Yang H Lu Y Management of neurotoxic reactions induced by antibody-drug conjugates Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing 2024 11 11 100595 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100595 39582554 PMC11582371 Zhang, J., Yang, H., & Lu, Y. (2024). Management of neurotoxic reactions induced by antibody-drug conjugates. Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing, 11 (11), Article 100595. 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100595 39582554 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100595 PMC11582371
157. Pryce BR Wang DJ Zimmers TA Ostrowski MC Guttridge DC Cancer cachexia: Involvement of an expanding macroenvironment Cancer Cell 2023 41 3 581 584 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.02.007 36868225 PMC11221352 Pryce, B. R., Wang, D. J., Zimmers, T. A., Ostrowski, M. C., & Guttridge, D. C. (2023). Cancer cachexia: Involvement of an expanding macroenvironment. Cancer Cell, 41 (3), 581–584. 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.02.007 36868225 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.02.007 PMC11221352