MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.5887

Медицинская библиотека · JAMA ophthalmology · 2025

Femtosecond Laser Arcuate Keratotomy vs Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation in Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Zhong Yueyang, Chen Shuying, Wang Hanle, Li Su, Lu Zhouyu, Xu Jingjie, Yu Yibo, Yao Ke

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

IMPORTANCE

After cataract surgery, postoperative residual astigmatism can influence a patient's visual quality and satisfaction. Finding ways to minimize this astigmatism is important.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes of femtosecond laser arcuate keratotomy (FSAK) and toric intraocular lens (TIOL) implantation for astigmatism correction in patients undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS

This randomized clinical trial was conducted between October 2021 and September 2023 at the Eye Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China. Patients with mild to moderate regular corneal astigmatism ranging from 0.75 diopters (D) to 3.00 D were recruited.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive FSAK or TIOL implantation.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the subjective manifest refraction assessed at 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 196 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.4 [13.7] years; 124 female [63%]) were randomized to the FSAK group (98 [50%]) or TIOL group (98 [50%]), and 92 patients (94%) and 95 patients (97%), respectively, finished the 3-month follow-up. At 3 months postoperatively, there was no difference in the refractive astigmatism between the 2 groups (mean [SD], 0.64 [0.64] D vs 0.54 [0.55] D; difference, 0.11 D; 95% CI, -0.06 to 0.27 D; P = .21). The mean (SD) uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.15 (0.20) logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/28) for the FSAK group and 0.14 (0.19) logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/28) for the TIOL group (difference, 0.01 D; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.06 D; P = .71). Subgroup analyses showed that TIOL implantation achieved lower residual astigmatism compared with FSAK when treating astigmatism exceeding 1.5 D or against-the-rule astigmatism.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Results of this randomized clinical trial demonstrate that in study participants with mild to moderate astigmatism undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, FSAK was not superior to TIOL implantation for astigmatism correction. However, for astigmatism exceeding 1.5 D or against-the-rule astigmatism, TIOL implantation demonstrated greater efficacy over FSAK. Future trials are needed to determine if there is greater efficacy of TIOL implantation over FSAK as suggested by subgroup analyses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR.org.cn Identifier: ChiCTR2100051066.

Для цитирования: Zhong Yueyang, Chen Shuying, Wang Hanle, Li Su, Lu Zhouyu, Xu Jingjie, Yu Yibo, Yao Ke. Femtosecond Laser Arcuate Keratotomy vs Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation in Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.. JAMA ophthalmology. 2025. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.5887.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.