The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
Smac mimetic combined with eCD4-Ig reverses latency without reducing SHIV reservoirs in rhesus macaques.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pache Lars, Bui John K, Klouser Lindsay M, Fennessey Christine M, Noyola Alexander C, Einhaus Teresa, Zhu Haiying, Stensland Laurence, Leguizamo Isai, Koroma Abubakarr A, Teriete Peter, Chang W L William, Hyrien Ollivier, Duggan Natasha N, Heimann Dominik, Pérez-Osorio Ailyn C, Bar Katharine J, Cosford Nicholas Dp, Keele Brandon F, Hartigan-O'Connor Dennis J, Farzan Michael, Gardner Matthew R, Jerome Keith R, Chanda Sumit K, Kiem Hans-Peter, Peterson Christopher W
Аннотация
Despite the success of antiretroviral therapy in controlling HIV replication, latent viral reservoirs persist, presenting a major barrier to a cure. Current treatment approaches that aim to reactivate latent virus and eliminate infected cells, termed "shock and kill," hold promise but have yet to demonstrate meaningful reservoir reduction in vivo. In this study, we explored combining ciapavir, a Smac mimetic latency-reversing agent, with adeno-associated virus-delivered (AAV-delivered) eCD4-Ig to treat antiretroviral therapy-suppressed, SHIV-infected rhesus macaques. We could demonstrate that a Smac mimetic can induce modest reactivation of the latent SHIV reservoir, as evidenced by transient increases in plasma viremia. However, while AAV-expressed eCD4-Ig conferred partial protection against intrarectal SHIV challenge in uninfected animals, neither eCD4-Ig nor ciapavir reduced the viral reservoir in SHIV-infected rhesus macaques, as determined by total SHIV DNA and a 5-target intact provirus detection assay. Animals treated with the combination showed no significant differences in viral rebound kinetics post-analytical treatment interruption compared with controls. Additionally, repeated ciapavir dosing resulted in adverse effects in some animals, suggesting potential toxicity with repeat administration. These findings highlight the challenges in reducing viral reservoirs using this shock-and-kill approach, particularly in SHIV-infected models, and suggest that further optimization of both latency-reversing agent and immune-mediated clearance strategies is required.