Journal of tissue viability · 2019
Survey of registered nurses' selection of compression systems for the treatment of venous leg ulcers in the UK.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Oates Angela, Adderley Una
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Venous leg ulceration is common in older adults in the United Kingdom. The gold-standard treatment is compression therapy. There are several compression bandage and hosiery systems that can be prescribed or purchased, but it was unclear what types of compression systems are currently being used to treat venous leg ulceration within the UK. This online scoping survey of registered nurses sought to (1) to identify what compression systems are available across the UK, (2) how frequently these are in use and (3) if there are any restrictions on their use.
RESULTS: The results showed that registered nurses who treat patients with venous leg ulceration use a wide range of compression systems. The most frequently used systems are the 'less bulky' two-layer elastic and inelastic compression bandaging systems whilst two-layer hosiery was used less frequently and four-layer bandaging used infrequently. Nurses report that certain compression systems are less accessible through the usual procurement routes but this appears to be related to concerns about competency in application techniques.
CONCLUSIONS: The data in this survey provides some important insights into the issues around the use of compression therapy for venous leg ulceration in the UK. Limiting access to certain types of compression may promote patient safety but limit patient choice. There may be underuse of the types of compression that promote patient independence, such as hosiery, and over-use of potentially sub-therapeutic therapy such as 'reduced compression'. Overall, this study suggests that further consideration is needed about the provision of compression therapy to UK patients with venous leg ulceration to optimise care and patient choice.
RESULTS: The results showed that registered nurses who treat patients with venous leg ulceration use a wide range of compression systems. The most frequently used systems are the 'less bulky' two-layer elastic and inelastic compression bandaging systems whilst two-layer hosiery was used less frequently and four-layer bandaging used infrequently. Nurses report that certain compression systems are less accessible through the usual procurement routes but this appears to be related to concerns about competency in application techniques.
CONCLUSIONS: The data in this survey provides some important insights into the issues around the use of compression therapy for venous leg ulceration in the UK. Limiting access to certain types of compression may promote patient safety but limit patient choice. There may be underuse of the types of compression that promote patient independence, such as hosiery, and over-use of potentially sub-therapeutic therapy such as 'reduced compression'. Overall, this study suggests that further consideration is needed about the provision of compression therapy to UK patients with venous leg ulceration to optimise care and patient choice.