MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00156-1

Медицинская библиотека · Ophthalmology · 2000

Screening relatives of patients with familial chronic open angle glaucoma.

Nguyen R L, Raja S C, Traboulsi E I

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To describe the value and the results of screening of family members of individuals with familial chronic open-angle glaucoma (COAG) for the disease.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study of families with COAG.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-six individuals from 15 families with COAG.

TESTING: Complete ophthalmologic examinations, automated perimetry, and optic nerve photography.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disease status as glaucoma patient (at least two of three parameters abnormal: intraocular pressure, visual field, or disc appearance), glaucoma suspect (one of three parameters abnormal), or normal.

RESULTS

Twenty-six relatives were diagnosed with COAG. The diagnosis was most frequently made on the basis of intraocular pressure readings and automated perimetry. Twenty-three relatives were classified as glaucoma suspects; automated perimetry was the most useful modality for the detection of abnormalities in these individuals. Siblings of COAG patients had the highest risk of COAG developing (64.7%) compared with children (13.2%) or other blood relatives (22.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

When COAG is present in more than one family member, immediate and other relatives should be evaluated for glaucoma by means of clinical examination and automated perimetry.

Для цитирования: Nguyen R L, Raja S C, Traboulsi E I. Screening relatives of patients with familial chronic open angle glaucoma.. Ophthalmology. 2000. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00156-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.