Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2026
Myeloid dendritic cell subsets characterise muscle in patients with inclusion body myositis and correlate with the IFN-γ pathway and effector T cell markers.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kirou Raphael A, Pinal-Fernandez Iago, Casal-Dominguez Maria, Pak Katherine, Ikenaga Chiseko, Nelke Christopher, Wischnewski Sven, Preusse Corinna, Del Orso Stefania, Naz Faiza, Islam Shamima, Gutierrez-Cruz Gustavo, Lloyd Thomas E, Schirmer Lucas, Ruck Tobias, Stenzel Werner, Selva-O'Callaghan Albert, Milisenda Jose C, Mammen Andrew L
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Inclusion body myositis (IBM) is an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy characterised by type 1 inflammation, driven by muscle-infiltrating KLRG1+ and TBX21+ cytotoxic T cells. However, the cellular sources of the stimuli that trigger this effector response in the muscle of patients with IBM remain unclear. Given their role as antigen-presenting cells, we hypothesised that these may be myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs), which have previously been reported in skeletal muscle of patients with IBM. We used immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, single-nucleus RNA-sequencing (snRNA-seq) and bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data from skeletal muscle of patients with IBM, other myositis, and controls to identify mDCs and characterise their contribution to IBM inflammation.
METHODS: We first analysed snRNA-seq data from 3 datasets to identify, quantify, and characterise 3 mDC subsets: type 1 conventional dendritic (cDC1) cells, type 2 conventional dendritic (cDC2) cells, and mature immunoregulatory dendritic (mregDC) cells. We then analysed RNA-seq data from 2 datasets to correlate specific markers of these subsets with markers of IBM disease activity. We used immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence to confirm mDC presence.
RESULTS: All 3 mDC subsets, and especially cDC1 cells, are relatively increased in the muscle of patients with IBM and correlate strongly with IBM-specific inflammatory markers, including KLRG1 and TBX21. In particular, cDC1 cells specifically express the KLRG1 ligands, CDH1 and CDH2, and, along with mregDC cells, IL12B, representing possible juxtacrine and paracrine signals for effector T cells in IBM.
CONCLUSIONS: Skeletal muscle of patients with IBM is specifically characterised by mDC subsets that correlate with markers of cytotoxic T cells and type 1 inflammation.
METHODS: We first analysed snRNA-seq data from 3 datasets to identify, quantify, and characterise 3 mDC subsets: type 1 conventional dendritic (cDC1) cells, type 2 conventional dendritic (cDC2) cells, and mature immunoregulatory dendritic (mregDC) cells. We then analysed RNA-seq data from 2 datasets to correlate specific markers of these subsets with markers of IBM disease activity. We used immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence to confirm mDC presence.
RESULTS: All 3 mDC subsets, and especially cDC1 cells, are relatively increased in the muscle of patients with IBM and correlate strongly with IBM-specific inflammatory markers, including KLRG1 and TBX21. In particular, cDC1 cells specifically express the KLRG1 ligands, CDH1 and CDH2, and, along with mregDC cells, IL12B, representing possible juxtacrine and paracrine signals for effector T cells in IBM.
CONCLUSIONS: Skeletal muscle of patients with IBM is specifically characterised by mDC subsets that correlate with markers of cytotoxic T cells and type 1 inflammation.