Transplantation proceedings · 2022
Renoportal Anastomosis and Its Complications: A Complex Case Report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Perfecto Arkaitz, Gastaca Mikel, Prieto Mikel, Palomares Ibone, Ventoso Alberto, Ruiz Patricia, Mambrilla Sara, Muga Eunate, Senosiain María, Salvador Patricia, Testillano Milagros, Fernández José R, Bustamante F Javier, Valdivieso Andrés
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Renoportal anastomosis (RPA) is an effective technique in cases of complex portal vein thrombosis with the presence of a splenorenal shunt. The objective of this report is to describe the possible complications related to RPA.
CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old man with alcohol-related and hepatitis C-related cirrhosis and 2 hepatocellular carcinomas underwent liver transplant. He presented a portal vein thrombosis Yerdel IV, a splenorenal shunt, and another shunt between the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) and the perirectal plexus. During surgery, the flow of the left renal vein was 891 mL/min, and this rose to 1050 mL/min after IMV clamping. RPA was made through iliac vein graft interposition, and the IMV was ligated. Portal flow was 832 mL/min but drastically decreased because of mesenteric root compression. After finishing the liver transplant, a renoiliac graft percutaneous transhepatic stent was put in place. The patient presented graft dysfunction and acute kidney injury. On postoperative day +18, a second stent was put in place because of a thrombosis in the splenomesenteric confluence. The patient subsequently presented partial distal rethrombosis and a pancreaticoduodenal arteriovenous fistula, which required several embolizations. The patient developed ascites, recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding, and persistent bacterial peritonitis. Finally, a modified Sugiura procedure (without splenectomy) was performed, achieving a portal flow of 1800 mL/min. However, the patient developed sepsis and multiorgan failure, and died on postoperative day +70.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite long-term patient and graft survival within accepted limits after LT, RPA is a challenging technique not exempt from complications.
CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old man with alcohol-related and hepatitis C-related cirrhosis and 2 hepatocellular carcinomas underwent liver transplant. He presented a portal vein thrombosis Yerdel IV, a splenorenal shunt, and another shunt between the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) and the perirectal plexus. During surgery, the flow of the left renal vein was 891 mL/min, and this rose to 1050 mL/min after IMV clamping. RPA was made through iliac vein graft interposition, and the IMV was ligated. Portal flow was 832 mL/min but drastically decreased because of mesenteric root compression. After finishing the liver transplant, a renoiliac graft percutaneous transhepatic stent was put in place. The patient presented graft dysfunction and acute kidney injury. On postoperative day +18, a second stent was put in place because of a thrombosis in the splenomesenteric confluence. The patient subsequently presented partial distal rethrombosis and a pancreaticoduodenal arteriovenous fistula, which required several embolizations. The patient developed ascites, recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding, and persistent bacterial peritonitis. Finally, a modified Sugiura procedure (without splenectomy) was performed, achieving a portal flow of 1800 mL/min. However, the patient developed sepsis and multiorgan failure, and died on postoperative day +70.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite long-term patient and graft survival within accepted limits after LT, RPA is a challenging technique not exempt from complications.