MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.anorl.2023.11.011

Медицинская библиотека · European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases · 2023

Surgery of sublingual and minor salivary gland cancer: REFCOR recommendations by the formal consensus method.

Pham Dang N, Jegoux F, Barry B, Verillaud B, Baujat B, Fakhry N, Chabrillac E, Vergez S

СтатьяConsensus StatementПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine the indications and modalities for resection in the management of primary sublingual and minor salivary gland cancer, and the specific features of each primary location.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

The French Network of Rare Head and Neck Tumors (REFCOR) formed a steering group who drafted a narrative review of the literature published on Medline and proposed recommendations. The level of adherence to the recommendations was then assessed by a rating group, according to the formal consensus method.

RESULTS

Histological evidence (submucosal biopsy) is recommended before surgical treatment of minor salivary gland carcinoma. Surgical treatment is recommended, with optimal oncologic margins, adapted to anatomical factors, histologic type and grade and functional consequences, with reconstruction if necessary.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of primary minor salivary and sublingual gland cancer is surgical, with wide resection margins. The modalities of resection and reconstruction are highly dependent on tumor location, extension and histologic type.

Для цитирования: Pham Dang N, Jegoux F, Barry B, Verillaud B, Baujat B, Fakhry N, Chabrillac E, Vergez S. Surgery of sublingual and minor salivary gland cancer: REFCOR recommendations by the formal consensus method.. European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2023.11.011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.