The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2005
Individual subject laryngeal dimensions of multiple mammalian species for biomechanical models.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hunter Eric J, Titze Ingo R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This report provides a detailed knowledge base of individual subject laryngeal cartilage dimensions across multiple species to assist researchers in creating subject-specific biomechanical laryngeal models.
METHODS: The raw data from previous laryngeal cartilage studies were grouped by species (for human, canine, and ovine) and by cartilage (arytenoid, thyroid, and cricoid) by means of a previously reported labeling scheme. No animals were sacrificed specifically for the present study.
RESULTS: More than 1,500 measurements from 37 subjects are presented in 15 tables. No comparisons of the average measures were attempted, as they were done in previous studies.
CONCLUSIONS: By means of a database of individual subject dimensions, a laryngeal model could be designed and tested to morph from one subject to the next, predicting subject-specific results of laryngeal function. Eventually, this would lead to modeling patient-specific laryngeal disorders and the prediction of therapeutic outcomes. An electronic downloadable version of the database is made available to assist in this effort.
METHODS: The raw data from previous laryngeal cartilage studies were grouped by species (for human, canine, and ovine) and by cartilage (arytenoid, thyroid, and cricoid) by means of a previously reported labeling scheme. No animals were sacrificed specifically for the present study.
RESULTS: More than 1,500 measurements from 37 subjects are presented in 15 tables. No comparisons of the average measures were attempted, as they were done in previous studies.
CONCLUSIONS: By means of a database of individual subject dimensions, a laryngeal model could be designed and tested to morph from one subject to the next, predicting subject-specific results of laryngeal function. Eventually, this would lead to modeling patient-specific laryngeal disorders and the prediction of therapeutic outcomes. An electronic downloadable version of the database is made available to assist in this effort.