Drug and alcohol review · 2026
Factors Associated With Preferences for Opioid Agonist Therapies Among People Dependent on Opioids.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stowe M J, Conway Anna, Altice Frederick L, Colledge-Frisby Samantha, Read Phillip, Montebello Mark, Whitton Gilbert, Hayllar Jeremy, Daglish Mark, Cock Victoria, Christmass Michael, Crawford Sione, Henderson Charles, Dore Gregory J, Gough Chris, Farrell Michael, Degenhardt Louisa, Grebely Jason
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Opioid agonist therapies (OAT) reduce adverse outcomes of illicit opioid use, with individual preferences potentially improving treatment outcomes. We explored preferences for OAT and associated factors in a national sample of people with opioid dependence.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited 400 participants (October 2020-April 2021) across Australia (excluding Tasmania) through snowball sampling. Participants completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire on sociodemographic and drug use characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression assessed factors associated with methadone preference (vs. buprenorphine).
RESULTS: Among all participants (median age 45, 41% female, 87% ever received OAT), 92% (n = 366) indicated a preference for receiving OAT (vs. not receiving OAT) and 96% of those (n = 352) preferred a particular type of OAT. Among 366 with a stated preference, 61% (n = 216) preferred methadone and 39% (n = 136) preferred buprenorphine. Among those preferring buprenorphine (n = 136), 50% (n = 68) preferred buprenorphine ± naloxone and 50% (n = 68) preferred long-acting injectable buprenorphine. Independent correlates of preferring methadone included past month heroin use (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.06-3.00) and non-prescribed pharmaceutical opioid use (aOR 2.23, 95% CI 1.07, 4.95), and any prior receipt of methadone treatment (aOR 6.54, 95% CI 2.66, 17.91). Among those receiving OAT, a higher proportion of people currently receiving buprenorphine preferred their medication (61/66, 92%) compared to methadone recipients (180/235, 77%).
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all participants preferred OAT, mostly reflecting prior experiences, underscoring the need for expanded access to OAT in Australia. Given the multiple stated preferences, OAT options should include a variety of treatment options aligned with patient preferences, including expanded take-home options.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited 400 participants (October 2020-April 2021) across Australia (excluding Tasmania) through snowball sampling. Participants completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire on sociodemographic and drug use characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression assessed factors associated with methadone preference (vs. buprenorphine).
RESULTS: Among all participants (median age 45, 41% female, 87% ever received OAT), 92% (n = 366) indicated a preference for receiving OAT (vs. not receiving OAT) and 96% of those (n = 352) preferred a particular type of OAT. Among 366 with a stated preference, 61% (n = 216) preferred methadone and 39% (n = 136) preferred buprenorphine. Among those preferring buprenorphine (n = 136), 50% (n = 68) preferred buprenorphine ± naloxone and 50% (n = 68) preferred long-acting injectable buprenorphine. Independent correlates of preferring methadone included past month heroin use (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.06-3.00) and non-prescribed pharmaceutical opioid use (aOR 2.23, 95% CI 1.07, 4.95), and any prior receipt of methadone treatment (aOR 6.54, 95% CI 2.66, 17.91). Among those receiving OAT, a higher proportion of people currently receiving buprenorphine preferred their medication (61/66, 92%) compared to methadone recipients (180/235, 77%).
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all participants preferred OAT, mostly reflecting prior experiences, underscoring the need for expanded access to OAT in Australia. Given the multiple stated preferences, OAT options should include a variety of treatment options aligned with patient preferences, including expanded take-home options.