Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi · 2026
[Comparison of Procedural Parameters and Efficiency between Angio FFR and Wire-based FFR for Functional Severity Assessment].
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Itai Hirotaka, Ideguchi Daichi, Kawasaki Toshihisa
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Angio FFR has attracted attention as a method for assessing the functional severity of intermediate coronary artery stenosis. However, detailed comparisons with wire-based FFR in terms of radiation dose and procedural efficiency remain limited. This study aimed to compare examination-related parameters and procedural efficiency between the two methods and to evaluate the clinical utility of angio FFR.
METHODS: This retrospective clinical study included patients who underwent functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis using either angio FFR or wire-based FFR during cardiac catheterization. The evaluated parameters were reference-point air kerma at the patient entrance reference point (Ka,r), air kerma-area product (PKA), fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, number of images, and angiography room stay time. Continuous variables were compared using median values and interquartile ranges.
RESULTS: Compared with the wire-based FFR group, the angio FFR group showed significantly lower Ka,r, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, and angiography room stay time (p<0.05). No significant differences were observed in PKA (p=0.95) or the number of images (p=0.27).
CONCLUSION: Angio FFR was associated with lower Ka,r and improved procedural efficiency compared with wire-based FFR, suggesting its potential utility in functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis.
METHODS: This retrospective clinical study included patients who underwent functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis using either angio FFR or wire-based FFR during cardiac catheterization. The evaluated parameters were reference-point air kerma at the patient entrance reference point (Ka,r), air kerma-area product (PKA), fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, number of images, and angiography room stay time. Continuous variables were compared using median values and interquartile ranges.
RESULTS: Compared with the wire-based FFR group, the angio FFR group showed significantly lower Ka,r, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, and angiography room stay time (p<0.05). No significant differences were observed in PKA (p=0.95) or the number of images (p=0.27).
CONCLUSION: Angio FFR was associated with lower Ka,r and improved procedural efficiency compared with wire-based FFR, suggesting its potential utility in functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis.