Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2026
Evaluating the usefulness of ChatGPT and Gemini in generating educational content for patients with vitiligo: a comparative cross-sectional study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tamer Funda, Polat Muhterem
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of ChatGPT and Gemini in generating information suitable for developing educational materials for patients with vitiligo.
METHODS: Information was obtained from ChatGPT and Gemini in response to questions regarding vitiligo derived from the American Academy of Dermatology website. Differences between the groups were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: Author 1 assigned a completeness score of 2 to 6 out of 15 responses generated by ChatGPT. All texts received full scores for accuracy, comprehensibility, and usefulness. Six responses from Gemini were scored 2 for completeness, and 1 response received a score of 2 for comprehensibility; all other evaluations were assigned full scores. Author 2 assigned a completeness score of 2 to 3 responses from each model, and 1 Gemini response was rated 2 for comprehensibility. All other assessments received full scores. The mean Flesch Reading Ease scores for ChatGPT and Gemini were 34.92 ± 12.28 and 31.40 ± 13.33, respectively (P = 0.41).
CONCLUSION: ChatGPT and Gemini provided largely accurate and useful information on vitiligo; however, most responses were difficult to read. The content should be reviewed and refined by dermatologists to ensure adequate readability before being disseminated to patients.
METHODS: Information was obtained from ChatGPT and Gemini in response to questions regarding vitiligo derived from the American Academy of Dermatology website. Differences between the groups were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: Author 1 assigned a completeness score of 2 to 6 out of 15 responses generated by ChatGPT. All texts received full scores for accuracy, comprehensibility, and usefulness. Six responses from Gemini were scored 2 for completeness, and 1 response received a score of 2 for comprehensibility; all other evaluations were assigned full scores. Author 2 assigned a completeness score of 2 to 3 responses from each model, and 1 Gemini response was rated 2 for comprehensibility. All other assessments received full scores. The mean Flesch Reading Ease scores for ChatGPT and Gemini were 34.92 ± 12.28 and 31.40 ± 13.33, respectively (P = 0.41).
CONCLUSION: ChatGPT and Gemini provided largely accurate and useful information on vitiligo; however, most responses were difficult to read. The content should be reviewed and refined by dermatologists to ensure adequate readability before being disseminated to patients.