Pituitary · 2026
Does persistent hyperprolactinemia contribute to bone loss independently of estrogen deficiency in postmenopausal women?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tunc Ali, Muradov Ilkin, Capar Mehmet Umut, Kocaman Banu Betul, Farajli Mayis, Yogurtcu Sebnem, Baykal Oguz Alp, Taze Sabriye Sibel, Durcan Emre, Sahin Serdar, Ozkaya Hande Mefkure, Kadioglu Pinar
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with prolactinoma diagnosed during the premenopausal period and to compare skeletal outcomes according to prolactin status during drug-free follow-up.
METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional single-center study included 42 postmenopausal women with prolactinoma. Patients were classified as hyperprolactinemic or normoprolactinemic based on serum prolactin levels at the last follow-up visit. BMD was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine and femoral neck. Clinical variables were compared between groups. Correlation analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and multivariable logistic regression were performed.
RESULTS: Lumbar spine BMD was significantly lower in hyperprolactinemic patients than in normoprolactinemic patients (0.861 ± 0.124 vs. 0.960 ± 0.129 g/cm², p = 0.022), whereas femoral neck BMD did not differ. Patients with hyperprolactinemia had longer cumulative exposure to hyperprolactinemia and required longer and higher-dose cabergoline treatment. Baseline prolactin levels were higher in patients with osteoporosis and showed potential discriminatory value for identifying osteoporosis (AUC = 0.861). Lumbar spine BMD and T-scores were inversely correlated with prolactin levels. In multivariable analysis, baseline prolactin level remained independently associated with low BMD.
CONCLUSION: Persistent hyperprolactinemia is associated with lower lumbar spine BMD in postmenopausal women with prolactinoma. Baseline prolactin level and cumulative exposure to prolactin excess appear to be important contributors to skeletal deterioration, supporting the need for routine bone health assessment during long-term follow-up.
METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional single-center study included 42 postmenopausal women with prolactinoma. Patients were classified as hyperprolactinemic or normoprolactinemic based on serum prolactin levels at the last follow-up visit. BMD was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine and femoral neck. Clinical variables were compared between groups. Correlation analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and multivariable logistic regression were performed.
RESULTS: Lumbar spine BMD was significantly lower in hyperprolactinemic patients than in normoprolactinemic patients (0.861 ± 0.124 vs. 0.960 ± 0.129 g/cm², p = 0.022), whereas femoral neck BMD did not differ. Patients with hyperprolactinemia had longer cumulative exposure to hyperprolactinemia and required longer and higher-dose cabergoline treatment. Baseline prolactin levels were higher in patients with osteoporosis and showed potential discriminatory value for identifying osteoporosis (AUC = 0.861). Lumbar spine BMD and T-scores were inversely correlated with prolactin levels. In multivariable analysis, baseline prolactin level remained independently associated with low BMD.
CONCLUSION: Persistent hyperprolactinemia is associated with lower lumbar spine BMD in postmenopausal women with prolactinoma. Baseline prolactin level and cumulative exposure to prolactin excess appear to be important contributors to skeletal deterioration, supporting the need for routine bone health assessment during long-term follow-up.