European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
The Importance of Considering Personal Recovery for Eating Disorders.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Allen Andrew, Tunstall Maddison, Houlihan Catherine, Pozzebon Kay, Fassnacht Daniel B, Ali Kathina
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Definitions of recovery from eating disorders (EDs) have traditionally emphasised symptom reduction and functional restoration. However, growing research highlights the importance of integrating personal recovery, defined by self-acceptance, autonomy, and psychological wellbeing. This study explored the relationship between partial clinical remission and personal recovery in individuals with lived experience of an ED.
METHOD: A total of 234 participants (N = 234; Mage = 28.10; 89.3% female; 49.6% non-heterosexual) were recruited online and completed measures assessing ED symptom severity, quality of life, and personal recovery. Criteria for partial clinical remission were based on established cut-offs for measures of ED symptomology. Personal recovery was defined by self-endorsement of a validated recovery framework.
RESULTS: Chi-square tests revealed that rates of personal recovery (52.1%) were significantly higher than rates of partial clinical remission (22.6%). While clinical remission increased the likelihood of personal recovery (OR = 6.46), many participants endorsed personal recovery despite not meeting clinical criteria. No significant differences in personal recovery were found between ED types or between heterosexual and non-heterosexual participants as an exploratory analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the importance of incorporating personal recovery constructs into ED assessment, treatment, and outcome monitoring.
METHOD: A total of 234 participants (N = 234; Mage = 28.10; 89.3% female; 49.6% non-heterosexual) were recruited online and completed measures assessing ED symptom severity, quality of life, and personal recovery. Criteria for partial clinical remission were based on established cut-offs for measures of ED symptomology. Personal recovery was defined by self-endorsement of a validated recovery framework.
RESULTS: Chi-square tests revealed that rates of personal recovery (52.1%) were significantly higher than rates of partial clinical remission (22.6%). While clinical remission increased the likelihood of personal recovery (OR = 6.46), many participants endorsed personal recovery despite not meeting clinical criteria. No significant differences in personal recovery were found between ED types or between heterosexual and non-heterosexual participants as an exploratory analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the importance of incorporating personal recovery constructs into ED assessment, treatment, and outcome monitoring.