MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00152192-200403000-00005

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society · 2004

Wound-healing outcomes using standardized assessment and care in clinical practice.

Bolton Laura, McNees Patrick, van Rijswijk Lia, de Leon Jean, Lyder Courtney, Kobza Laura, Edman Kelly, Scheurich Anne, Shannon Ron, Toth Michelle, Wound Outcomes Study Group

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Wound-healing outcomes applying standardized protocols have typically been measured within controlled clinical trials, not natural settings. Standardized protocols of wound care have been validated for clinical use, creating an opportunity to measure the resulting outcomes.

PURPOSE: Wound-healing outcomes were explored during clinical use of standardized validated protocols of care based on patient and wound assessments.

DESIGN

This was a prospective multicenter study of wound-healing outcomes management in real-world clinical practice.

METHOD: Healing outcomes from March 26 to October 31, 2001, were recorded on patients in 3 long-term care facilities, 1 long-term acute care hospital, and 12 home care agencies for wounds selected by staff to receive care based on computer-generated validated wound care algorithms. After diagnosis, wound dimensions and status were assessed using a tool adapted from the Pressure Sore Status Toolfor use on all wounds. Wound, ostomy, and continence nursing professionals accessed consistent protocols of care, via telemedicine in home care or paper forms in long-term care. A physician entered assessments into a desktop computer in the wound clinic. Based on evidence that healing proceeds faster with fewer infections in environments without gauze, the protocols generally avoided gauze dressings.

RESULTS

Most of the 767 wounds selected to receive the standardized-protocols of care were stage III-IV pressure ulcers (n = 373; mean healing time 62 days) or full-thickness venous ulcers (n = 124; mean healing time 57 days). Partial-thickness wounds healed faster than same-etiology full-thickness wounds.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide benchmarks for natural-setting healing outcomes and help to define and address wound care challenges. Outcomes primarily using nongauze protocols of care matched or surpassed best previously published results on similar wounds using gauze-based protocols of care, including protocols applying gauze impregnated with growth factors or other agents.

Для цитирования: Bolton Laura, McNees Patrick, van Rijswijk Lia, de Leon Jean, Lyder Courtney, Kobza Laura, Edman Kelly, Scheurich Anne, Shannon Ron, Toth Michelle, Wound Outcomes Study Group. Wound-healing outcomes using standardized assessment and care in clinical practice.. Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. 2004. DOI: 10.1097/00152192-200403000-00005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.